Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is beautiful.
1 posted on 01/05/2002 4:44:01 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Timesink
"I will never come back here," she said outside the store. "There are plenty of places in this town where I can buy coffee with my kids -- and they're smoke-free, too."

So why the $%^%& did you need to pass some Nazi law to enable that in the first place you dimwit???

2 posted on 01/05/2002 4:46:18 PM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
..."Those businesses that are putting smokers ahead of youth are shortsighted and grossly irresponsible," he said. "They are putting profits ahead of employees and customers. This issue has always been about health."...

Yeah, right, uh-huh.......January 1, 2003 will se government imposing a ban because donuts are fattening and someone has a study somewhere that children are overweight and obese and don't get enough exercise.

3 posted on 01/05/2002 4:49:32 PM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Children are a ... minority... you can't discriminate against them simply because you want to make money."

Children are a minority? Well then, technically, so are the owners of doughnut shops. And the customers. Which minority gets its rights protected?

4 posted on 01/05/2002 4:50:12 PM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
One of these days we'll have to have a climactic battle...

Normal, decent people on one side, and stinking liberal pukes on the other.

Like that scene in 'Braveheart'...

Two enormous crowds just running toward each other swinging whatever is handy and screaming at the top of their lungs.

5 posted on 01/05/2002 4:50:13 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Ugh - I've seen it all. Some Canucks understand Capitalism more than we do.
6 posted on 01/05/2002 4:51:40 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Love it.

These businesses are just that: BUSINESSES. They're not daycares charged with watching after children. Besides, who's more likely to give you business, the guy with the job (who just happens to smoke), or the kid with no job.

9 posted on 01/05/2002 4:55:36 PM PST by sirshackleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
For Ms. Jonasson, the idea that a place dedicated to jelly-filled confections would allow parents with children to use only the drive-through window is insulting.

For pity's sake, get a grip.........

Children having everything their little black hearts desire is not the be all, end all of the world!

10 posted on 01/05/2002 4:56:48 PM PST by SeaDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Already posted under it's actual title HERE
11 posted on 01/05/2002 4:56:49 PM PST by BansheeBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Another case where the village refuses to raise the child...I bet Hillary's butt is puckered so tight that her panties will look tie-died if ever she gets them removed....Heh, heh...
13 posted on 01/05/2002 4:58:31 PM PST by Tarzantheape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
ROFL. Stupid laws. They shouldn't bring kids to a donut shop anyway -- too fattening! There augtta be a law!

Here in CA, they just made a law that all smokes must be behind a counter, for full service sale, to prevent children from stealing smokes. A friend of mine who owns a smoke shop was ticked off.. he couldn't possibly move all tobacco items in the shop behind the counter, so he built a small counter, stuck a cash register on it, put it in front of the enclave where all cartons of smokes are stored, and put up a sign that said "full service only". Of course, it is not full service. He doesn't use that register, it is just subterfuge for the cops.

18 posted on 01/05/2002 5:01:18 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
I just want to know what it is with Canadians and donuts? It's like there are at least 2 or 3 donut shops on every block.
22 posted on 01/05/2002 5:03:49 PM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
I don't smoke but this is really great! Let the looneylibs pick up the pieces from their idiot laws.
23 posted on 01/05/2002 5:05:13 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
"The irony is that the bylaw was meant to protect children, not harm them. The way it is being applied has the exact opposite result," said David Matas, a Winnipeg immigration lawyer who works on human-rights issues. "Children are a vulnerable minority. But you can't discriminate against them simply because you want to make money."

Something tells me this lawyer does not see the true irony here. I guess a lawyer can make a case for anything these days.

Lawyers really are the scourge of society, driving up the cost of everything, and in this case making the absurd claim that a child has a right to force everyone else to refrain from smoking.

The women had it exactly right when she huffed that there were plenty of other places to get a cup of coffee and donuts for her wee tots.

26 posted on 01/05/2002 5:07:45 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Those businesses that are putting smokers ahead of youth are shortsighted and grossly irresponsible
This issue has always been about health."
the bylaw was meant to protect children, not harm them.
Children are a vulnerable minority. But you can't discriminate against them simply because you want to make money."

What a collection of busy-body imbecilic whiners. These people make me ill. They will never, ever mind their own business. They interefered, and since it backfired, how much you wanna bet they are going to interfere again. The store owners should just ban minors, period... smoke or not.

28 posted on 01/05/2002 5:08:32 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
"Those businesses that are putting smokers ahead of youth are shortsighted and grossly irresponsible," he said. "They are putting profits ahead of employees and customers. This issue has always been about health."

Wellllllllll, those donuts shops are in business to make "profits", dunce, and it sounds like they are putting their customers first or else the customers would have stayed away.

I love this! I hope they keep it up! It's a strike for freedom! These people had a choice, smokers or kids and they chose smoking customers so that they could stay in business and for freedom against the liberal nazis.

Most nazi anti-smokers usually don't eat donuts, cheesecake, drink caffinated drinks, or anything else that they "think" (have been told by their commie gurus that it's very unhealthy so as to control them) might harm them.

I could have throttled like idiots a couple of years ago when my dentist's son got a cancerous brain tumor, at the time nuts like these were trying to convince everyone that too done/burned hot dogs would cause such. My dentist was agonizing over it to me and it was heartbreaking.

30 posted on 01/05/2002 5:09:32 PM PST by chantal7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Someone needs to ask the people who passed the no smoking law just when did doughnuts become a good health food for kids? I'll bet if the truth was known, sugar over the long run is more harmful than tobbacco. I keep thinking the people will wake up to the stupid laws that are being passed. Maybe not.
35 posted on 01/05/2002 5:13:27 PM PST by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
"We tried to obey the bylaw for one day and we lost half our business," she said.

Hmmmmm. That's strange. US resturant owners claimed that would happen to them, but the opposite happened. Turns out folks still eat EVEN if they can't smoke. Who knew?

38 posted on 01/05/2002 5:13:46 PM PST by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan
Like WE'D ever see this happening around here!!!! Fehhhhhh
44 posted on 01/05/2002 5:29:17 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan
Like WE'D ever see this happening around here!!!! Fehhhhhh
45 posted on 01/05/2002 5:29:26 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
"The irony is that the bylaw was meant to protect children, not harm them. The way it is being applied has the exact opposite result," said David Matas, a Winnipeg immigration lawyer who works on human-rights issues. "Children are a vulnerable minority. But you can't discriminate against them simply because you want to make money."

Well, of course not, you socialist bastard. It makes much more sense to discriminate against the smokers who contribute over $7 billion to the Canadian economy and the business owners who are (right now) free to keep kids safe while safeguarding their businesses. Yup. Sounds reasonable to me.

Why do socialists and liberals in general always flash the "CHILDREN" card when they want to bellyache about something?

But you can't discriminate against them simply because you want to make money.

Mr. Matas is correct here. Seeing how kids really don't have that much in the way of discretionary funds, we should absolutely not discriminate against them, and allow them to enter strip clubs, porno shops, nightclubs, and doughnut shops where people smoke. Seems some people can't make fascist beaurocrats happy.

46 posted on 01/05/2002 5:29:58 PM PST by cincinnati_Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson