Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

And justice for none
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Bill O'Reilly's

Posted on 01/03/2002 4:40:57 PM PST by expose

And justice for none

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

There is something very wrong inside the Justice Department of the United States and there has been for some time.

Various newspapers are now reporting that under President Clinton, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was ordered to stand down on various terrorist investigations.

One of the most egregious examples is the failure of the bureau to investigate fundraising organizations like "The Holy Land Fund," based in Arizona, which allegedly funneled millions of dollars in donations to Middle Eastern terrorists.

Although the Bush administration has now frozen the assets of the fund, it was apparently allowed to operate for 8 years despite the FBI intelligence that was presented to Mr. Clinton and then-Attorney General Janet Reno. One bureau source told the press that Ms. Reno felt any investigation of "The Holy Land Fund" would lead to anti-Arab sentiment and therefore was opposed to such an investigation.

As always, Ms. Reno will not comment on any aspect of her tenure as attorney general that is at all controversial.

There is no question now that under Ms. Reno and then-FBI Director Louis Freeh, Americans were put at great risk. The Wen Ho Lee-Chinese espionage case still has not been explained, and the fact that the 19 Sept. 11 terrorists weren't even on the FBI's radar screen is about as frightening as Janet Reno's passion for political correctness.

The current attorney general, John Ashcroft, has made no attempt to examine Ms. Reno's bizarre behavior or update the public about the Marc Rich investigation or anything else. Mr. Ashcroft specializes in looking dour and stonewalling. While Congress is attempting to get documents about President Clinton's dubious foreign fundraising and FBI abuses in Boston, Ashcroft is refusing to cooperate at all.

And this isn't a political issue. Conservative Congressman Dan Burton and liberal Congressman Barney Frank have actually joined forces to try and pry this information from Ashcroft's hands. If that's not amazing, then nothing is.

The truth is that for nearly 8 years, the Justice Department has been corrupt and inefficient. Janet Reno botched nearly every important decision she had to make including Waco and Elian Gonzalez. Time after time, Ms. Reno refused to approve investigative initiatives sought by the FBI. And time after time, Mr. Freeh sat in his plush government office refusing to let the American people know what was happening.

Now Mr. Ashcroft is doing the same thing. There is no reason on this earth why the public should not know the status of the Rich pardon probe. Or the anthrax investigation. And what about Enron, Mr. Attorney General – are you going to look into that? Millions of Americans were hosed while some Enron executives made millions.

How about a comment on that, Mr. Ashcroft?

For far too long the attorney general and his band of political appointees have held themselves above public accountability. How many times have we heard the phrase: "We're not allowed to comment, the case is under investigation"?

That, of course, is one big lie. The attorney general can legally comment on anything but grand jury testimony.

Janet Reno hightailed it out of Washington without clearing up a single controversy. Now she rides around in her truck asking the people of Florida to elect her governor. Hey, good choice if you love fascism. Ms. Reno is the kind of public servant who makes decisions and feels no need to explain them. The Third Reich would have loved her.

The tragedy of the Justice Department is it is our fault. We Americans simply will not pay attention to the corruption of this very important part of our government even after 9-11. We allow the stonewalling, the political correctness and the incompetence.

And it's just a matter of time before we pay the price for our apathy again.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: SSN558; expose
There are a lot of plausible explanations for delay, but I'm with you on the value of timing; and not just for the next election cycle. I think there's enough to crush some and keep others at bay for years.

I'll give the benefit of the doubt and watch through the next election cycle. On the other hand, the decision by MJ Whitewash not to prosecute the Torch is very troubling.

21 posted on 01/03/2002 8:12:28 PM PST by kitchen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness; OWK; tex-oma
fyi
22 posted on 01/03/2002 8:22:36 PM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
It's obvious that our handlers have gotten to the point where they rely on the New York Times to spin their insanity.

The problem is that we've been educated by 8 years of Slick and as such don't swallow the gubment line as easily as before.

Some of us that is.

23 posted on 01/03/2002 8:27:03 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SSN558
Bush could have dumped the Clinton left overs and gone after Clinton when he came into Office. Waiting is only going to raise the question WHY didn't he prosecute while he had the chance.
24 posted on 01/03/2002 8:34:49 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: expose
BUMP !!!!! HI expose. thanks !
25 posted on 01/03/2002 8:50:12 PM PST by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
When will you people realize that THE CLINTONS AND THE BUSHES ARE JOINED AT THE HIP IN CORRUPTION DATING BACK TO IRAN CONTRA ???????
26 posted on 01/03/2002 9:09:54 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Bush could have dumped the Clinton left overs and gone after Clinton when he came into Office. Waiting is only going to raise the question WHY didn't he prosecute while he had the chance.

...Go figure...I'm a pessimist at heart...I can only figure that THERE AIN'T MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES WHEN IT COMES RIGHT DOWN TO IT...ok, I'll go to bed now...

FMCDH

27 posted on 01/03/2002 9:15:56 PM PST by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
I believe all Presidents are connected at the throat. That's why they are so careful about handling knives, (knives is another name for prosecutors/blackmailers.)
28 posted on 01/03/2002 9:55:45 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: expose
Sounds like an issue that can be used against Reno by Jeb Bush in Florida.
29 posted on 01/03/2002 10:47:39 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
I'm not saying anything, since I don't have to. Others, however, sure are saying something.
Seems like some others aren't saying anything!
I'm just flagging along here...
30 posted on 01/03/2002 11:54:10 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Henchman
I have finally figured out why Janet Reno is running for governor of FL, when (IMHO) she has little chance of winning. It's the best and maybe only protection she has from jail.

As long as she is running for some political office, she can, with the media lapdogs agreeing in unison, claim that any attempts to go after her by Ashcroft or the Bush Administration are designed to "interfere" with the election and "rig it" in favor of Jeb. She believes that Ashcroft and Bush won't pursue her, and she is probably right.

If she wins the Dem primary (not a cinch), no one at DOJ will want to go after her until 2003. By that time, the defenses of "old news," "won't you ever let it go" and the like can and will be used. In addition, some of the investigatory trails will have gone cold. And of course, we can't forget about the "poor, elderly, Parkinson's-ravaged woman" defense.

31 posted on 01/04/2002 4:39:54 AM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: verboten; expose
"Well we dont have Janet Reno to kick around anymore, but that doesn't stop the Republicans from insisting that Ashcroft is still held hostage to the past incompetance."

Same folks that insist that a switch was flipped when Clinton and Mob took office from Bushdaddy and corrupted the FBI, CIA, DEA, NSA, INS, etc. with the wave of the witches wand.

They're unwilling to face the facts. The Fact is that all of these agencies answer to a higher power than the President. The President is just a Useful Fool. Jr. is proof of that.

32 posted on 01/04/2002 5:26:52 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
(friendly tone) And who would that higher power than the President be (in 50 words or less)?
33 posted on 01/04/2002 6:35:12 AM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: expose; Snow Bunny; Alamo-Girl; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; onyx; RonDog; .30Carbine...
And justice for none
(Bill O'Reilly)

Excerpt:

Janet Reno hightailed it out of Washington without clearing up a single controversy. Now she rides around in her truck asking the people of Florida to elect her governor. Hey, good choice if you love fascism. Ms. Reno is the kind of public servant who makes decisions and feels no need to explain them. The Third Reich would have loved her.

The tragedy of the Justice Department is it is our fault. We Americans simply will not pay attention to the corruption of this very important part of our government even after 9-11. We allow the stonewalling, the political correctness and the incompetence.

And it's just a matter of time before we pay the price for our apathy again.


This doesn't address the subpoena issue that you link on post #7. President Bush used executive privilege to block release of the information that Dan Burton et al (Now Barney Frank joins him???). . .
(((PING))))))
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my ping list!. . .don't be shy.
34 posted on 01/04/2002 6:54:38 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"President Bush used executive privilege to block release of the information that Dan Burton et al (Now Barney Frank joins him???)." I confess, I do not get this. It seems so obviously wrong.
35 posted on 01/04/2002 7:05:31 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: expose
bump
36 posted on 01/04/2002 7:10:40 AM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
The Fact is that all of these agencies answer to a higher power than the President. The President is just a Useful Fool. Jr. is proof of that.

Nah. All this corruption stuff just 'happens by accident', don't you know.

37 posted on 01/04/2002 7:24:39 AM PST by Ridin' Shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks for the heads up! When he originally threatened to use executive privilege I wondered why on thread - because IMHO, it can be easily defeated if there is probable cause of criminal conduct. (Nixon tapes for instance.) So I still wonder if the administration actually wants the congress to force the information out of them in court - so that, when they discover all the misconduct, the press and public cannot finger this administration as being "out to get" the Clintons and crew?
38 posted on 01/04/2002 7:26:55 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sistergoldenhair
""Corruption is a Career Opportunity at just about any Federal Agency.""

Yeah, start out as a kid at the B A T F and work your way up the corrupion ladder from there.
39 posted on 01/04/2002 7:35:17 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks for the ping. Interesting thread and posts.
40 posted on 01/04/2002 8:13:30 AM PST by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson