Replies

You're refering to Iceberg's post in 451. In it he defends the "idea" that his race should survive. You evidently feel that this "idea" is too controversial to be aired. In fact you try to shame me into refuting that post or even admitting that I could possibly agree with him. I find nothing objectional in his premise.

I believe you stated that you were of Mexicen ancestry. If asked if I thought it were a good thing to see your race extinguished, I'd answer with an emphatic no! In fact I find it distrubing every time an isolated tribe or language ceases to exist. Those should be sustained, even by artifical means if necessary. Should they become the dominant cultures outside their normal rhelm? Of course not.

Let me ask you something. Do you think we should allow Klydsdale (sp?) horses to become extinct? Why not, there are many different horses aren't there? So what if one subset disappears? What about subsets of birds, fish, cats or any other species? I would hope that you would agree that to lose a one of them would be a shame. Yet when it comes to humans, you're right up front with your appearant glee that the caucasian race as a percentage of the world's populace is in decline. And when confronted with the fact that there may be no nations with a majority white populace within fifty years, you ask, "So what?"

And you think we're racists?