Posted on 01/01/2002 12:30:30 AM PST by colette_g
Tuesday, 1 January, 2002, 09:10 GMT US targets NI dissidents ![]() The UK has always urged action against the groups
The US has frozen the assets of four loyalist groups and one republican paramilitary group as part of its war on terror. Officials designated the groups as suspected terrorist organisations but said it was too early to tell if any of them have financial assets in the US. The loyalist groups targeted were the Loyalist Volunteer Force, Orange Volunteers, Red Hand Defenders, and the Ulster Defence Association, also thought to cover sister organisation, the Ulster Freedom Fighters. The republican Continuity IRA has also been singled out. Paramilitary gangs The EU imposed financial sanctions against the same groups, as well as other organisations last week. Ulster Unionist leader David Trimble called in October for the US to crack down on the profits of paramilitary gangs in Northern Ireland. He was spurred on by the murder of investigative journalist Martin O'Hagan who had uncovered paramilitary gangs responsible for organised crime. And Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith has also expressed his belief that the US war on terror in the wake of 11 September should include Northern Ireland. The five paramilitary groups were posted on the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control Web site on Monday. International co-operation Secretary of State Colin Powell decided on the list in consultation with Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Attorney General John Ashcroft. State Department spokesman Philip Reeker applauded the EU's decision to sanction the groups. "We have consistently said that the fight against terrorism requires international co-operation in the fullest measure," he said. At the same time, a sixth organisation, Spain's First of October Anti-fascist Resistance Group, has also been targeted.
|
Our stated objective was never to get rid of terrorists who were Muslim ... but rather "terrorists" and "terrorism". The IRA qualifies. (Didn't you love the picture of Gerry Adams hugging Fidel Castro last week).
A terrorist or criminal of any stripe - should be hammered, regardless of ethnicity, race or religion....
I believe in Equal Opportunty bastard stomping or killing, when needed..
Semper Fi
"For the purposes of this Common Position, "terrorist act" shall mean one of the following intentional acts, which, given its nature or its context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation, as defined as an offence under national law, where committed with the aim of:
(i) seriously intimidating a population, or
(ii) unduly compelling a Government or an international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or
(iii) seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation:(a) attacks upon a person's life which may cause death;(b) attacks upon the physical integrity of a person
The sect of the IRA known as the 'Real IRA' are known to get along with Baltic and Balkan terror groups and also are linked to ETA, a Basque separatist group. Through ETA they have ties to al-Qeada. These various groups tend to carry water for one another, sharing resources and offering other assistance.
As for the IRA (in all its assorted sects), they are native tyrants, like John Walker and Timothy McVeigh. It's not like the IRA doesn't have a history of car-bombing or mail-bombing people, is it? They might be a bit pickier about their targets than al-Qeada but not much pickier. The ETA and the IRA have sent personnel for training in Libya. (Now that's not where good guys go to train- you aren't getting trained in how to avoid killing 'too many' people there, I guarantee it.) Moammar and his ilk the sort of folks I'd want to hang around with. The IRA wasn't learning to be 'freedom fighters' while they were there; if anything their politics have little to do with 'freedom,' since their goals are to have an Ireland to the left of even England.
However legitimate the original cause, once it has been swallowed up in a communist agenda it ceases to be legitimate. The original freedom movement had already petered out when the more recent IRA in all its red glory picked it up in the 60s. If the Irish want to be rid of the British, fine. But don't replace foreign 'tyrants' with native tyrants, much less worse native tyrants.
Don't confuse a quest for 'group rights' or 'ethnic rights' or even so-called 'liberation movements' with 'individual rights,' for they are not neccessarily the same thing. If anything, the pursuit of separatism is pointless if the result is a form of communism, if the result impairs individual liberty, most notably in the area of property rights. Fans of Stalin and Marx or Fidel and Quadaffi aren't going to provide more individual liberty even if they do oust perceived invaders from their soil, because such people's beliefs, being communist, run contrary to permitting people to have much in the way of individual property rights. The track record for Stalin-fans hasn't been too good for other individual liberties, either. Why would the IRA be any different?
I see nothing in the IRA to indicate its ideology would would make individual Irish citizens any more free than they are now. Quite the opposite.
If we keep this line up with the IRA and their friends, we might even impact Kennedy's wallet. ; )
exactly im irish american and it hurts to see what goes on in ireland...I dont approve of the IRA but in any case all i would like to see is peace in ireland without british control
It is my impression that the focus of this article are the Unionist organizations that have been cut off. No doubt a number of other IRA groups have been affected earlier. You can go to the Treasury Department website to take a look.
So, what is your question?
I hope and believe that most people there just want to live in peace; it is only a small group of radicals on each side which are trying to prevent that.
perhaps i didnt word it right
what i meant was i want to see peace without british control without any bloodshed if possible
This war was never specifically against on;y Muslim terrorists. It is against all terrorists. That means eliminating all terrorist groups, whether Muslim or other.
"The New World Order is just trying to eliminate everyone opposed to them."
Tin foil hat alert...those groups can use the court of international opinion in order to achieve their goals, rather than blowing people up.
Right back at you! BUMP
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.