Posted on 12/29/2001 1:35:20 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
"FWIW...The Righteous Shall Triumph!!"
(To be sung to Buffalo Springfield's "For What It's Worth")
There's somethin' happenin' here...it ain't Right...Vile Left, they Rule by Fear!!
ATF men in a tank over there, slaughterin' kids whilst they knelt in prayer!!
It's high time we INDICT T-Mac...PUNK Dem's Clown!!
DNC Chairman...who killed Ron Brown?!!
There's bad men doin' Wrong...They'll win The Fight, unless the Right is Strong!!
Bold people must speak OUR minds...we're gettin' too much resistance from OUR side!!
It's time we ROUT Lib'rals, TRASH DemClowns!!
High time fer Justice to now Rebound!!
Clinton feels he can't be beat...Med'yuh Poltroons, they're Effete!!
Forgivin' wrongs, Press parrots Slick's LIES!! Most of them say, "Slick Willie's OUR GUY!!"
It's time we STOP DemRATS...Stop DemClowns!!
Big Guv'ment's shakin' OUR Country down!!
Rev-o-lutions start slow...but Limbaugh's Legions shall grow!!
Evil Wins when the Good are afraid!! Step outta line...the time's come fer Right to hold sway!!
We shall INDICT T-Mac...Stop Left's Clown!!
All ya good FReepers, come help us out!!
We gotta STOP Clinton...Crush Slick's Crown!!
Ev'rybody help what's goin' down!!
We're gonna STOP Lib'rals...STOP DemClowns!!
Destroy Lib'ralism...let's do it NOW!!
(12/29/2001...Happy Birthday, MamaMUD!!)
"Black I"
"Black II"
"Black III"
"Black IV"
"Black V"
It's High Time the Right INDICTED DNC Chairman Terry "Punk" McAuliffe, IMHO, of course!!
{G}
...yea yea; now isn't that a fact.
Why aren't the families of these folks demanding a Full Investigation of the MURDER of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown?!! Are the families getting paid off for their silence...or is it Fear that quiets their tongues?!
FReegards...MUD
Increasingly, neither do I and I think I'm becoming better-informed because of it.
BTW...FWIW, I read The Limbaugh Letter and National Review and Human Events.
FReegards...MUD
Alright...as I already explained in post #404...
goldilucky: "When he fired all the U.S. attorneys and replaced them with his Leftist rats, our judicial system has literally collapsed!"
MUD: "That's a bit strong..."
goldilucky: "Oh really? What's so "strong" about my statement..."
And then you quoted some other statement that I had never said was "a bit strong"...sure, the lightweight nitwit Debate Team PUNKS like Algore and Puff Daschle might try to get away with a similarly disingenuous prank, but it's no way fer you and me to have a fruitful discussion, IMHO. I simply do not believe the Judicial System in America has yet to "literally collapse."
Whatever...good morning.
MUD
Methinx you are most likely correct...MUD
I guess just folks who give a damn about Truth, Justice, and the American Way of Life, right?!
SHEEEESH, didn't they teach you that in Leatherneck School?!
Sic Semper Tyrannis...MUD
Even if his life was in danger, how could a son so callously join in the Coverup of his Father's Murder?! It really is a sick expose of how decrepit the souls of the Lib'ral Effete Elite really are!! Vince Foster's wife is a similarly-stricken sicko, IMHO.
BTW...Jessie Jackson's son graduated from UVA in the same class as my brother back in '92, I believe. We sat two rows in front of the Jackson family at Memorial Gym in Charlottesville...LOL!! Whatta warped family that is.
FReegards...MUD
LOL...dude, ya musta got yanked 'cuz what ya said in #470 was simply Ignorant, not dirty.
Oh well...these Leftist Trolls come and they go, right?
MUD
BTW...admit it, please, you are not really an ex-Marine, right?
Ok then? And in reponse to that above statement you made which I (pardon me) misquoted, my response remains unchanged.
"Skins to Replace Schottenheimer with Spurrier"
Hope it works out fer DannyBoy and my Skins, but I simply think Schottenheimer couldda done the job with ONE MORE YEAR...now, we'll never know.
Betcha Michael Westbrook resigns with us, though...he'll be a sleeper Fantasy Pick next season.
FReegards...MUD
BTW...heard it was 99% Certain that Troy Aikman will be playing in the NFL next year for a team with a chance to make it to the Super Bowl. As of this morning, scuttlebutt's that he's sweet on the Dolphins, but I stay with my PrescientOnePrediction that Aikman shall lead the Washington Redskins to the Super Bowl in January 2003!!
[Note: Kausfiles received the following from a gravelly-voiced outdoorsman in Arkansas who refused to give his name.]
"It was strictly an accident. The dog just darted out."
That is what the media wants us to believe about the death of Buddy, Bill Clinton's 4-year-old Labrador retriever. (See "Who Is Buddy?" Wall Street Journal, Dec. 1997.) But is the truth about this-the latest Clinton casualty-that conveniently simple?
What do we really know about Buddy's death? Who stood to benefit? Consider the following:
On Dec. 19, 2001 Clinton has a meeting in his Harlem office to discuss ways to repair his "battered" image. The meeting is described in the New York Times as having a "special urgency." An image-building speech on globalization at Yale has apparently not brought Clinton the expected public sympathy. Democratic leaders, Clinton is reported to have said, had not spoken up sufficiently on his behalf. They could not be relied on.
Present at the meeting was Bruce Lindsey, Clinton's secretive consigliere and the man entrusted with the Clintons' most distasteful tasks.
Exactly two weeks later, Buddy was dead. As could have been predicted, Clinton benefited from a wave of public sympathy-sympathy he hadn't felt since at least Sept. 11. Clinton's office almost instantly issued a press statement saying the Clintons were "deeply saddened by Buddy's death."
It's almost as if it had been planned all along.
A look at the actual circumstances of Buddy's demise does little to allay suspicions. As many as nine strange facts remain uninvestigated. Consider:
THE NINE SUSPICIOUS FACTS ABOUT BUDDY'S DEATH
1. With all the high-tech security available to an ex-president on the Chappaqua property, the Clintons had apparently somehow failed to install what a dog expert called "the one essential safety feature, an invisible fence." This system would have given Buddy a small shock as he neared the property line, warning him not to cross it. Unless, of course, it had been turned off.
2. We are told that on Jan. 2, the day of Buddy's mysterious, violent end, "neither Clinton nor his wife was at home." Is this really a coincidence? Would the former first couple pay $1.7 million for a suburban headquarters and then just happen to not be at home when their dog is killed? On the other hand, if you wanted to do away with your dog, you'd want no fingerprints. Wouldn't you arrange to be out of town that day?
3. Would the trained ex-presidential personnel entrusted with Buddy's care really unintentionally allow him to "bolt" through the "front door" chasing a "contractor"? Who were these handlers? Why haven't such key eyewitnesses been subpoenaed?
4. Who was the shadowy "contractor" and why did he leave in such a hurry? What was he installing at the Clintons' residence, which had been fully remodeled several years ago? Isn't it strange that he would leave the gate open, when any "contractor" worth his salt knows that an open gate plus a dog equals a lawsuit?
5. Buddy is said to have "scampered" fully "600 feet down the road," and then another 100 feet on heavily traveled Route 117 before he was hit. Have you ever "scampered" 600 feet, the length of two football fields?
6. The 17-year-old "high school senior" who allegedly ran over Buddy has been described in the press as a "pretty brunette"-the same description, practically, that was once applied to White House intern Monica Lewinsky. What, if any, was her connection with the ex-president?
7. It is illegal in Chappaqua to allow a dog to run outside your property without a leash unless the dog is "under the owner's voice or visual control." Was Buddy actually being controlled? If not, who decided, at what level, to break the law? Why did an employee of the town clerk's office in heavily Democratic Chappaqua tell the New York Post (Jan. 4) that the penalty for violating this regulation only applies if a dog is picked up by a dog catcher?
8. Celebrity dog trainer Bash Dibra has now come forward, in the Post (Jan. 4), to say that he strictly advised Clinton to always use a leash with Buddy outside the home. Why was this celebrity advice ignored?
9. Writing in the New York Times, a former Clinton aide, now a shadowy "communications consultant," discloses that when Clinton was in office-perhaps at the very height of the impeachment scandal-Buddy would "pad on down to the basement of the West Wing, poking his nose into the wastebaskets outside Sidney Blumenthal's office." Yes, that Sidney Blumenthal, the partisan conspiratorialist who is so often at the center of Clintonian machinations-the same Sidney Blumenthal who had seemingly eerily anticipated last week's deadly event by writing a play about a scandal involving the president's dog. Why Blumenthal's trash, and no one else's? What did the doomed Labrador find there? Had Buddy smelled too much?
Connect the dots. It doesn't add up. No other conclusion seems even possible.
Perhaps some subpoenas would help shake loose the real story. But who in Congress will step forward to do what is necessary?
Remember: When they say it's not about the leash, it's about the leash!
Oh, Prescient One. I noticed that the Hoos vaulted out of the ACC cellar this weekend with that big win at North Carolina.
Lunch tomorrow?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.