Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Bush Grants Permanent Trade Status to China
ABCnews ^

Posted on 12/27/2001 1:08:54 PM PST by hawaiian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-278 next last
To: grania
"Isn't anyone in charge concerned that the US is losing, or has lost its ability to be self sufficient if everyone who didn't like us got together and declared a war?"

That's one of the many aspects that bothers me. All the hotshot economists declare what a good thing it is for the American consumer to have access to all these goods at attractive prices, but they don't have an answer for what happens when a war or someting cuts off that supply.

We had a sample of that when we had a shortage of things like sugar and copper and rubber during WW2. It wasn't a lot of fun. What with the US importing 65% of its crude oil these days, an embargo of our supply would be catastrophic.

61 posted on 12/27/2001 2:01:33 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: deport
Here is the full text of George W. Bush's proclamation.
62 posted on 12/27/2001 2:01:37 PM PST by hawaiian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian
This will DESTROY al-Qaeda forever.
India to make great gains.
World-wide reaction to follow.
This is Big News!
IMHO
63 posted on 12/27/2001 2:08:43 PM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian

President Grants Permanent Normal Trade Relations to China

By Scott Lindlaw
Associated Press Writer
Published: Dec 27, 2001

CRAWFORD, Texas (AP) - President Bush on Thursday extended permanent normal trade status to China, calling it "a final step in normalizing U.S.-China trade relations."

In a proclamation, Bush also formally declared that the 1974 Jackson-Vanik law no longer applies to China. The law denies normal trade relations with communist states that restrict emigration.

Since 1980, China has enjoyed temporary normal trade relations with the United States under annual presidential waivers of the law. But each waiver has triggered debates in Congress over China's record on human rights and weapons proliferation abuses.

The last occurred in July, when the House voted 259-169 to approve Bush's waiver this year, the last that will be necessary because of China's recent entry into the World Trade Organization. Congress last year granted permanent trade status to China contingent upon its entry into the WTO.

The new trade status will take effect Jan. 1, Bush said in an announcement released in Crawford, Texas, where he is vacationing.

"This is the final step in normalizing U.S.-China trade relations and welcoming China into a global, rules-based trading system," he said.

China joined the World Trade Organization last month, a move Bush said would be "an important underpinning" for democratic reforms in the communist nation.

China and the United States have reached an agreement, as part of China's WTO entry, under which China will lower tariffs on U.S. goods and open up its service sector to American companies.

China's tariffs on U.S.-made goods are to fall from an overall average of 25 percent to 9 percent by 2005. Duties on America's primary farm products are to drop from 31 percent to 14 percent.

China currently enjoys an $80 billion trade surplus with the United States.

AP-ES-12-27-01 1746EST


64 posted on 12/27/2001 2:09:47 PM PST by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59

Chinese missile delivery system

Much too sophisticated for the Western mind to master.

65 posted on 12/27/2001 2:10:40 PM PST by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
I manage a company that ships telecom gear to Lucent China-- thus far they are pretty fair folks to work with. They like a clean deal with not too much red tape. It has been very good for us so far.

We Americans should purchase products based on quality rather than price and where it was manufactured. If we do that, then free trade will be a very good thing. The only problem is I think Americans are really focused on the price tag rather than the quality and that is bad for America.

I don't buy cheap Chinese made product if I can help it. I'd rather buy from an American company and spend a little more if I have to.

66 posted on 12/27/2001 2:11:44 PM PST by Noswad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian
Bush is a complete idiot on the same level as Gore was. That's why he drew the same number of votes during the election.
67 posted on 12/27/2001 2:15:41 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
That's one of the many aspects that bothers me. All the hotshot economists declare what a good thing it is for the American consumer to have access to all these goods at attractive prices, but they don't have an answer for what happens when a war or someting cuts off that supply.

We had a sample of that when we had a shortage of things like sugar and copper and rubber during WW2. It wasn't a lot of fun. What with the US importing 65% of its crude oil these days, an embargo of our supply would be catastrophic.

This nation is drunken in a self delusion that we will not suffer war. So much to that fact that congress sits in denial of the very one we are in refusing to declare it such. People better start looking beyond their stock portfolios and start looking realistically at what is probabilities. Then their beloved shares in joint China ventures will be useless. Personally I think this nation is being used as useful idiots to build China's factories and technology and when that is accomplished China will turn on us like a Doberman just fed it's last piece of meat by a thief.

This nations leaders are deep in corporate pockets and could care less about the sovereignty of this nation. They sold us out. Both parties sold us out. I forgive neither for it. This is going to be what Panama was to Carter but then again I think Bush would have turned it over it as well. The very thin line between Gore vs Bush just got thinner. Both it seems agreed more than they disagreed this even by Bush's own words.

68 posted on 12/27/2001 2:17:48 PM PST by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Things Clinton would have been roasted for now get a FR shrug!!

That's sadly true. I've pointed out that fact many, many times on here. If we're to be any different from liberals we must stand on the principles that we say we believe in, not just blindly HOORAY or ignore everything that happens just because "our guy" in in the White House now.

Bush is certainly better than Gore, but the list of things I don't like continues to grow. That's just a fact.

MM

69 posted on 12/27/2001 2:20:27 PM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian
Why don't you post it.........

WIRE: 12/27/2001 5:14 pm ET


The Associated Press


CRAWFORD, Texas (AP) Text of President Bush's proclamation Thursday on China's permanent trade status.

1. The United States and the People's Republic of China (China) opened trade relations in 1980. Since that time, the products of China have received nondiscriminatory treatment pursuant to annual waivers of the requirements of section 402 of the Trade Act of 1974 (the "Trade Act") (19 U.S.C. 2432). Trade between the United States and China has expanded significantly even though China has maintained restrictions on market access for U.S. exports and investment.

2. On Nov. 15, 1999, the United States and China agreed on certain terms and conditions for China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) that when implemented will eliminate or greatly reduce the principal barriers to trade and investment in China.

3. On Nov. 9, 2001, pursuant to section 101(b) of Public Law 106-286, 114 Stat. 881, I transmitted a report to the Congress certifying that the terms and conditions for the accession of China to the WTO are at least equivalent to those agreed between the United States and China on Nov. 15, 1999. On Nov. 10, 2001, the Ministerial Conference of the WTO approved the terms and conditions for China's accession and invited China to become a member of the WTO. China has accepted these terms and conditions and became a WTO member on Dec. 11, 2001.

4. Pursuant to section 101(a)(1) of Public Law 106-286, 114 Stat. 881, I hereby determine that chapter 1 of title IV of the Trade Act should no longer apply to China.

Now, therefore, I, George W. Bush, president of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including but not limited to sections 101(a)(2) and 102(a) of Public Law 106-286, 114 Stat. 881, do hereby proclaim that:

(1) Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) shall be extended to the products of China; and

(2) The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of China shall be effective as of Jan. 1, 2002.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of December, in the year of our Lord 2001, and of the independence of the United States of America the 226th.

George W. Bush

Copyright 2001 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


70 posted on 12/27/2001 2:23:52 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian
What the HELL is going on here? Is the President surrounded by too many "offshore Businessmen"?

Unless this is a "cunning plan", this WILL bite them as more info from Gertz comes out.

71 posted on 12/27/2001 2:25:38 PM PST by Itzlzha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
But don't tell that to the corporate Republicans who only see profits and dollars and cents at the expense oftheir citizenry

I guess I'll just have to add ANOTHER one to my list. Let's see...

Bush Record 2001:

Pluses:

One measley Tax Return

Minuses:

Eminent Domain - Vastly expanded property siezure

HHS - Medical Privacy - Government siezure of Americans Medical Records

Drug War - $43 million "given" to the Taliban government to eradicate poppies, instead they erradicate 3000 Americans

Drug War - $7 billion+ tax dollars to Andes Intitiative - South America poised for war

Faith Based Initiative - $250 Billion tax dollars to churches

K-12 Education Plan - Take over of all public school education

PATRIOTACT - Dismantling of the US Constitution and Bill of Rights

Bail out - Airline industry

Bail Out - Insurance Industry

400 Billion dollars to Lockheed Martin..bombs,bombs, more bombs..

Seals presidential records..indefinitely

Seals USAG court records..indefinitely

PERMANENT TRADE STATUS WITH COMMUNIST CHINA

To come:

Escalates WOD at home

Escalatees WOT at home and across the globe. BTW - Torrorist = Anyone who disagrees with the Kings orders, WHICH, from the above list, would include anyone that has a problem with him taking our money to distribute it for federal welfare. Don't want your hard earned property taken? Your're a terrorist, don't like the feds taking ownership of your medical records, you're a terrorist, and etc.

All hail King George, or you vil be extearminated!!

72 posted on 12/27/2001 2:27:01 PM PST by Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #73 Removed by Moderator

To: MississippiMan
Bush is certainly better than Gore, but the list of things I don't like continues to grow. That's just a fact.

Agreed. See my list. Post #72

74 posted on 12/27/2001 2:29:23 PM PST by Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Sequitur
I get a little pissed at him also from time to time..

But, to be fair about it he does deserve a + for pulling Federal Abortion funding

(Oh my.. Oh how they howled about that one!)

76 posted on 12/27/2001 2:37:02 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: BLACK STEEL
Don't forget coddling of Pakistani terrorists at expense of Democratic Constitutional Republic India.

But those are "the good terrorists". You see, they are "with us" and not against us. They are helping us to move our military even CLOSER to the Chinese border (Kazmeir Sp?)

77 posted on 12/27/2001 2:37:03 PM PST by Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
But, to be fair about it he does deserve a + for pulling Federal Abortion funding

Didn't know about that one. Will DEFINITELY add that to the plus side. ;)

78 posted on 12/27/2001 2:39:58 PM PST by Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Sequitur
And you missed a Minus on our Navy base (and the ballot initiave) in PR.
79 posted on 12/27/2001 2:39:59 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: hawaiian
Argh...
80 posted on 12/27/2001 2:41:58 PM PST by k2blader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson