Restorationists vs Conservatives and Libertarians

Self | 12/23/01 | David Wright

[davidosborne]

Sounds like you are a "centrist" or a "moderate" is that an accurate description?

[davidosborne]

I think there are FAR too many people in this world who trust their "gut" when the Lord has already spoken LOUD AND CLEAR..

David

[davidosborne]

I think the problem is that we have not done a good enough job preaching the DIFFERENCES between conservatives and liberals and seek ALL TOO OFTEN to cave into compromise..

Jesus, never compromised... NOR SHALL I !!

David

[Snow Bunny]

Thank you Blackie.

[nopardons]

The use of the word " I ", is clearly NOT " argumentative at all !

I have NOT asked " rhetorical questions. I have asked question, to which I wish to receive an answer. You have TOTALLY refused to even deal. let alone answer my questions, TWICE , in one thread, by claimig that I ask " rhetorical questions. You can't answer them. Instead of weasling around them, just say that you don't know.

If men only followed WHICH GOD , and WHICH version of the Bible ? Are you suggesting that women should ONLY do what men tell them to ? ROTFLMAOPIMP !

Rather, men and women should NOT marry people, with whom they disagree about major positions; politics being one of them.

I am and ALWAYS have been a staunch advocate of the Electoral College. You haven't a clue, about what is in the Constitution, nor about elections, if you want an Electoral College, county by county. You are one of the people, whom the FFs, held in contempt. They were ELITISTS, and all of the repiticious " WE THE PEOPLE " , which you keep typing, is absurd, patently purile, irrational, and means NOTHING at all in this context.

I, a Conservative Republican. What ... you couldn't tell ? Well, I can't tell what exactly " RESTORAAYIONISTS " want , and have been impugne. smeared, and vilified for saying so. At least I answer questions. { - )

[blackie]

It's my pleasure, Pretty Lady !!

[MistyCA]

Thanks :)

[MistyCA]

Thanks Neil! ;)

[dcwusmc]

WRT your venom, having been a recipient of it more than once, I can attest that it's there. Not that I CARE what you spew, as I can shrug it off and, if needed, return fire and win the day with logic and rationality.

On the presumption that you are sincere in what you ask, there are only TWO amendments I would certainly want to see gone, the 16th and 17th, for the obvious reasons.

For, a BROKE government, one that has to BEG for money, is our SERVANT; a rich one that can put its hands in our pockets as and when IT decides to, is our MASTER. And a Senator beholden to the governor and legislature of his STATE will not seek to empower FedGov too much.

WRT Roe V Wade, let that go back to the STATES where such decisions SHOULD be made. You would have a far easier time getting abortion outlawed at the state level, in any case.

[davidosborne]

You seem to be quite bitter.. I will pray for you..

FReegards,

David

[nopardons]

Yet again, YOU have managed to avoid 99 % of honestly asked questions. The ONLY " venom" , in my original post to you, is in your mind. It is DELUSIONAL of you, to imagine that you have EVER bested me; let alone with " logic ", dear, and that more or less is the sum total of your continual hallucinations.

Not only are you incapable of debate, with your attitude, you won't EVER get anything that you wish; not ever. You push away people who agree with you .. even if that is only " partly ". Intill you can manage to post a cogent thread, where you are willing and able to eluccidate your thoughts, WITHOUT emotions and biases, you are bound to fail.

[nopardons]

I am far from " bitter ". I just don't suffer fools lightly.

Oh my, the old " I'LL PRAY FOR YOU " rubric. Thanks, but ONLY if you include asking for your own pardon, as well.:-)

[brewcrew]

The sheeple that make up this country are for the most part ignorant of the meaning and wisdom contained in the Constitution, and are too socialistic to even consider going back to the original intent.

They've been sucking from the teat of the Mother-State for too long. If they are forced to forage for their own food, they might have to go hungry for awhile, and that might hurt. To the sheeple, hunger is a disease that is treatable by Mother's milk, instead of a motivational state of being.

[dcwusmc]

OK... your attitude is showing. Now, IIRC, you asked this:

If, as you say, you want to be known as a Restorationist, shall we then assume that you want to eliminate the Ammendments[sic] , or not ? That was one of my questions. Another iportant[sic] query was, if today's Constitutionally LEGAL laws ( Roe V. Wade, for example ) is NOT recognized, because of the liberties, then taken by the Supreme Court, reading " privacey[sic] rights " supposedly taken from the Constitution, into that, just how will you elimiate[sic] THAT ?

and I replied:

On the presumption that you are sincere in what you ask, there are only TWO amendments I would certainly want to see gone, the 16th and 17th, for the obvious reasons.
For, a BROKE government, one that has to BEG for money, is our SERVANT; a rich one that can put its hands in our pockets as and when IT decides to, is our MASTER. And a Senator beholden to the governor and legislature of his STATE will not seek to empower FedGov too much.
WRT Roe V Wade, let that go back to the STATES where such decisions SHOULD be made. You would have a far easier time getting abortion outlawed at the state level, in any case.

So kindly reign it in. I ANSWERED your specific questions, OK? And perhaps a valium or two would calm you down enough to mind your typing! Just a suggestion. ;-)

[dcwusmc]

bump

[dcwusmc]

Re-bump for the new Year.

[Virginia-American]

Vin Suprynowicz has suggested that every Federal statute and Constitutional amendment enacted after 1912 should be repealed, or at least reviewed very carefully. that would be a good start

[dcwusmc]

Vin is a most excellent writer and I have great respect for him. I would have little hesitation in agreeing to that suggestion!