Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
OK... your attitude is showing. Now, IIRC, you asked this:

If, as you say, you want to be known as a Restorationist, shall we then assume that you want to eliminate the Ammendments[sic] , or not ? That was one of my questions. Another iportant[sic] query was, if today's Constitutionally LEGAL laws ( Roe V. Wade, for example ) is NOT recognized, because of the liberties, then taken by the Supreme Court, reading " privacey[sic] rights " supposedly taken from the Constitution, into that, just how will you elimiate[sic] THAT ?

and I replied:

On the presumption that you are sincere in what you ask, there are only TWO amendments I would certainly want to see gone, the 16th and 17th, for the obvious reasons.
For, a BROKE government, one that has to BEG for money, is our SERVANT; a rich one that can put its hands in our pockets as and when IT decides to, is our MASTER. And a Senator beholden to the governor and legislature of his STATE will not seek to empower FedGov too much.
WRT Roe V Wade, let that go back to the STATES where such decisions SHOULD be made. You would have a far easier time getting abortion outlawed at the state level, in any case.

So kindly reign it in. I ANSWERED your specific questions, OK? And perhaps a valium or two would calm you down enough to mind your typing! Just a suggestion. ;-)

255 posted on 12/29/2001 12:15:13 AM PST by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc
bump
256 posted on 12/29/2001 7:15:37 PM PST by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson