Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grampa Dave
While browsing, I found MADD on the list. Being curious, I checked. I have never been a supporter of MADD for instinctive reasons. Those reasons are now validated.

Motivation MADD has managed to artificially enlarge the societal problem of drunk driving, by continuously redefining the threshold for “drunk.” In late 1996 MADD’s Karolyn Nunnallee, then the organization’s president-elect, told the audience of NBC’s Today show: “While a lot of attention is paid to the serious problems of repeat offenders, we don’t want to overlook the casual drinker.” Even though the real drunk driving problem has been reduced to a relatively small group of incorrigible, “hard-core” offenders, MADD’s coffers will continue to grow as long as the problem is perceived to be worsening.

In 1994, Money magazine reported that telemarketers raised over $38 million for MADD, keeping nearly half of it in fees. In that same year, the group spent more than $2 million just on travel and conventions. Compare that to MADD’s paltry lobbying budget (a four-year total of only $636,000 from 1991 to 1994), and it’s not hard to see why the American Institute of Philanthropy (AIP) downgraded the group’s letter-grade ranking to a “D.” Indeed, MADD had been funneling nearly 63 cents of every dollar back to its fund-raising contractors, which is twice the rate that AIP considers acceptable.


19 posted on 12/13/2001 8:54:43 AM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: WIMom
"we don’t want to overlook the casual drinker"

To which my response would be: "I don't really care what you "want", as you're obviously a cynical, scheming moron bent on annoying honest citizens who have time for a real job!"

20 posted on 12/13/2001 9:01:06 AM PST by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: WIMom
Thanks for your reply! I believe that when more Americans find out re the funding and where most of the money of these phoney non profits go. They will start lessening the effect of these organizations! Most of these organizations do not want to see the problem they are against get resolved (if legitimate). If there is no problem, they will not exist anymore!
21 posted on 12/13/2001 9:07:29 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: WIMom
I share your distrust of MADD....

For the record, my ( late ) first wife was put in a wheelchair at age sixteen by a couple of drunk sailors in a Cadillac- I'm no friend of impaired drivers- but!

I don't like their lack of honesty- IMHO, they cloak themselves behind "motherhood & protecting our children" while actually being about vengance, and controling others. I just wish they'd be more forthright- I understand vengance quite well.

60 posted on 12/13/2001 10:34:28 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson