hillary clinton to be on Meet the Press today / Will Tim Russert do an Alan Colmes?

Tom Daschle and this bitch need to be stopped and if you believe this bitch will never run for president I have some Enron Stock to sell you.

She is devoid of nuance.

You don't have to ask for the questions ahead of time when it's democrat on democrat. They NEVER surprise each other unless the person has dropped to the Democrat "B" list party invite list.

ALL QUESTIONS IN ADVANCE, Please...

It is very significant that this mutant couldn't deny clinton culpability for the terrorism. Of course, she tried the tired clinton tactic -- if you can't pass the entire buck, spread the blame around. It won't fly. I sincerely doubt that the Democratic establishment wants another congenitally inept and depraved clinton running the show...

"Back in Chi' in the old days, we count the votes, and we keep counting them again and again until we get what we want."--Key Largo: Johnny Rocco - Chicago mobster, explaining his rise to power, boasting about fixing elections back in Chicago

GORE-DALEY-DEM ELECTION-THEFT-BY-MANUAL-RECOUNT PLOY DOCUMENTED BY DEMOCRAT ATTORNEY

COROLLARY 1: Do Democrat Precincts Prefer Punch Card Over More Accurate Optical Scan Ballots PRECISELY to Enable This Type of Election Theft?
COROLLARY 2: Is hillary clinton's "win" (which required a massive election-day
conversion of intractable hillary-haters) a result of Democrat Fraud? "Our strength is not in the ballot but in the counting...As long as I count the votes, what are you going to do about it?" --Boss Tweed, November 1871

"Downs told me, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, 'You get me within 100 votes and I can steal any election,'" Haueter told WorldNetDaily.

Nolan subsequently hired Downs and "brought him out to train my staff in the techniques they [Democrats] were using" so they could protect themselves against future election-fraud victimization, Nolan said.

Nolan and Haueter said Downs described three basic tactics:

"The first rule is, you keep counting until you're ahead. And if that doesn't put you ahead, you recount, re-recount -- you keep counting until you're ahead. If you're behind, then you've got nothing to lose."
Second, Nolan said, "the more times those ballots are handled, the more chance there is that chads will break loose" and hence disqualify the ballot.
Third, he said, "the minute you're ahead, you stop and declare yourself the victor."

"After that, you don't want the ballots handled any more," Nolan said, "because some of the chads for your candidate might break loose. While you're behind it doesn't matter, but if you're ahead and more break off or become disqualified for your candidate, that's a bad thing."
A favorite tactic, said Nolan, is to ask election officials for ballots, "allegedly so they can look at it more closely." When operatives do, often they will bend or crinkle ballots covertly in an effort to break another chad loose and thus have the ballot thrown out.
"This whole process sounds like exactly what is going on in Florida," Nolan said. "And the more times those ballots are handled, the more chances are you'll break some of them [chads] loose."
Nolan referred to Fox News' Tony Snow's weekend interview with Bush campaign representative and former Secretary of State James Baker, in which he asked Baker why -- after each time election officials run ballots through mechanical vote-tally machines -- there have been more votes counted or taken away from both candidates.
"Baker didn't have an answer to that," Nolan said. "But the answer is, because they've handled those ballots more times, breaking loose more of those chads" -- those that perhaps weren't completely punched through.

'How Democrats steal elections'

Why the Manual Recount is Unconstitutional:
Due Process, Equal Protection and Carol Roberts

"Explicit statistical evidence of massive ballot tampering in Palm Beach, Fl"

Afghan women must get the message. When they learn the truth, they will not allow the b*tch in their country.

Excellent premonition, Doug.

From the columns: You defend your own rights first
Turkish Daily News; Dec 1, 2001 -¦- http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=011201005019

HURRIYET (Turkish Daily News)

Afghan women's response to Hillary:

Afghanistan's first -- and legendary -- female general, Suheyla Siddiqi, scolded U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton for saying on various occasions that the Afghan women's rights should be defended.

Referring to Mrs. Clinton, Siddiqi said, 'You cannot defend your rights towards your husband. How can you defend our rights?

Saying that the western feminists had a fixation on the traditional burka worn by the Afghan women, she said, 'The burka existed before the Taliban came to power'.

Looks like her support dwindled to Tim and couple of NYC Talibans.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., talks with reporters during the taping of "Meet The Press" at the NBC studios in Washington Sunday, Dec. 9, 2001

OH no! It's ole crusty with the organge blouse!!!! I hope Tim is wearing his face mask.

Check it out! No wedding band.

Why wear a wedding ring when you are about to throw hubby to the dogs?

hillary clinton blames hubby for terrorism (NB: SHE knew nuttin') (Meet the Press, 12-09-01): by Mia T, 12-10-01
Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

Bill Clinton may not be the worst president America has had, but surely he is the worst person to be president.

---GEORGE WILL, Sleaze, the sequel

Had George Will written Sleaze, the sequel (the "sequel" is, of course, hillary) after 9-11-01, I suspect that he would have had to forgo the above conceit, as the doubt expressed in the setup phrase was, from that day forward, no longer operational.

Indeed, assessing the clinton presidency an abject failure is not inconsistent with commentary coming from the left, most recently the LA Times: "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize."

When the clintons left office, I predicted that the country would eventually learn--sadly, the hard way--that this depraved, self-absorbed and inept pair had placed America (and the world) in mortal danger. But I was thinking years, not months.

It is very significant that hillary clinton didn't deny clinton culpability for the terrorism. (Meet the Press, 12-09-01), notwithstanding tired tactics (if you can't pass the buck, spread the blame) and chronic self-exclusion. ("I knew nuttin'.")

If leftist pandering keeps the disenfranchized down by design, clinton pandering,("it's the economy, stupid"), kept the middle and upper classes wilfully ignorant for eight years.

And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton assiduously avoided any action that would have negatively impacted the economy (which was the sole source of his continued power), actions like, say, going after the terrorists.

It is critically important that hillary clinton fail in her grasp for power; read Peggy Noonan's little book, 'The Case Against Hillary Clinton' and Barbara Olson's two books; it is critical that the West de-clintonize, but that will be automatic once it is understood that the clintons risked civilization itself in order to gain and retain power.

It shouldn't take books, however, to see that a leader is a dangerous, self-absorbed sicko. People should be able to figure that out for themselves. The electorate must be taught to think, to reason. It must be able to spot spin, especially in this age of the electronic demagogue.

I am not hopeful. As Bertrand Russell noted, "Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so. "

Mega-Mia T thread...how could I have missed it?

Glad I got this message Monday morning. Although watching Hillary on Sunday morning is not something I would do.

If leftist pandering keeps the disenfranchized down by design, clinton pandering,("it's the economy, stupid"), kept the middle and upper classes wilfully ignorant for eight years.
And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton assiduously avoided any action that would have negatively impacted the economy (which was the sole source of his continued power), actions like, say, going after the terrorists.

hillary clinton blames hubby for terrorism (NB: SHE knew nuttin')

(Meet the Press, 12-09-01)

Q ERTY6 bump

As many before me have said, it was Russert "kissing and making up" with Hillary. Russert never fails to disappoint me as far as his left wing bias. Hillary never fails to induce vomiting.

I was... bzzzzzzzzzz!

Q ERTY4 bump!

Perhaps, you'll find Salon.com more comfy?

Why? Are you resentful of honest criticism? One cartoon or 2, but so much that it takes forever to load in? Don't be so defensive, one who is comfortable with himself invites honest feedback, not lockstep ass-kissing agreement with everything.