Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Painter for Nicole Brown Had Serial Murder Background
'Cross Country Killer' -The Glen Rodgers Story ^ | December 5, 2001 | Joyce Spizer and Claude Rodgers Jr.

Posted on 12/05/2001 7:22:24 AM PST by codebreaker

The Cross Country Killer, the Glen Rodgers story provides an insighful look into the mind and making of an American predator.

Glen Rodgers, twice on America's most 10 Wanted List, is currently on Death Row in Florida.

He brags about having killed 70 people, one of which may have been Nicole Brown Simpson.

Could it be a coincedence she was murdered just after meeting Glen?

There are witnesses who saw them partying together and there's even a photo of them together.

A sad but fascinating story that will keep you mesmorized till the end.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-355 next last
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
There is enough evidence in that case between testimony, and tampered evidence to lock up 75% of the prosecutory witnesses.
141 posted on 12/05/2001 10:07:49 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: commish
The possibility---always a 1,000% for anything!!

The probability you have a sane mind is below zero---NUTS!

142 posted on 12/05/2001 10:09:11 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
It was OJ and this glen guy. OJ loaned glen the Bruno's. In the ruckus of the murders glen sliced OJ. Hence glen walking with OJ's shoes leaving foot prints. case solved. Move along.
143 posted on 12/05/2001 10:09:27 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
My bet is the same as many - that as SOP, the cops were "sure" he did it, and made sure there was enough evidence to have a solid case

Exactly. Considering that Nicoles next of kin, was her MOTHER, why did they go to his home and breach the wall? (lots of perjury regarding that in the trial.)

144 posted on 12/05/2001 10:09:56 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Mossy Thunder
>>Wow! Will white people have coronaries across America over this? It no longer matters whether or not he's guilty because you've all made up your minds.<<

You forgot: NO RACIST POSTS. (Please).

145 posted on 12/05/2001 10:10:20 AM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Most arguments with people who believe that O.J. is innocent go something like this:

Did not!
Did too!
Did not!
Did too!
Did not!
Did too!
Your mother wears army boots!
Your sister is ugly!

etc., etc. ad nauseum

146 posted on 12/05/2001 10:10:35 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
If this turns out to be true, will OJ get his money back from the Brown's?
147 posted on 12/05/2001 10:10:40 AM PST by orfisher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TheCPA
The standard of proof for civil liability is by a preponderance of the evidence. That standard means that the trier of fact believes that the evidence in favor of liability at least slightly exceeds the evidence in favor of the defendant.

Websters: Preponderance
1. a superiority in weight or in power, importance, or strength
2a. a superiority or excess in number or quantity
2b. Majority

I conclude the Webster's definition implies more strength, than your suggestion.

148 posted on 12/05/2001 10:10:48 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
The probability you have a sane mind is below zero---NUTS!

And the possibility that you might procreate is frightening.

149 posted on 12/05/2001 10:11:05 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
No, it doesn't ....the standard is ..More likely or less likely....51% to 49% = guilty.
150 posted on 12/05/2001 10:12:14 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
As I understand it, Goldman was about 6 feet tall, went to the gym 4 days a week and was by all accounts in good shape.

He is facing an attacker who is almost the same size (if it was OJ) and is in a fight for his life.In fact the crime report says that there was a teriffic struggle with his killer.

Under those circumstances, dont you think that he might have gotten at least ONE punch in? If so, it would certainly have bruised. I used to box and I assure you, getting hit by a strong man, even with boxing gloves on, will leave a bruise.

OJ was minutely examined and was found to have NO bruises on his body, in fact the only injury( the cut on his hand ) was confirmed to have happend AFTER he arrived in Chicago or wherever it was.

I know I will be flamed for this but screw em, I would also have aquitted him, there were a great many reasons why I still believe there is reasonable doubt about his guilt.

knews hound

151 posted on 12/05/2001 10:13:19 AM PST by knews_hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: knews_hound
You are correct, The Coroners report says basically the same thing.
152 posted on 12/05/2001 10:14:22 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
I totally agree with you. To believe he did it, you have to believe many far fetched ideas. The questions you raised can not be honestly answered and come to the conclusion that OJ did it. All the "He had to do it" crowed want to hear is "there was blood on his clothes" and "He left a footprint".

The glove simply did not fit, and to say it "shrank" is insulting to my intelligence. Indeed, why would he leave certain bloody garments, and get rid of others? How was there so little blood on him when there was so much at the crime scene? And he surely did not have time to do it, clean up, and get to the limo.

I assume he "ran in the Bronco" because he KNEW it would be blamed on him. He probably already assuemd the cops had planted evidence. And no one here even wants to consider the facts of Nicole's past(and present) as possible reasons for someone to kill her. Hell, someone may have done it to get back at OJ, knowing it would easily be blamed on him.

153 posted on 12/05/2001 10:16:35 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
And the possibility that you might procreate is frightening.

Gee...how many freaks--bodies do you have in your head--closet?

Little deranged are you?

154 posted on 12/05/2001 10:18:10 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Can you tell, me, perhaps, which parts of the evidence Convinced you of the mans guilt?
155 posted on 12/05/2001 10:19:48 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Can you tell, me, perhaps, which parts of the evidence Convinced you of the mans guilt?

Thats easy, hobbes; I have listened to way too many "lynch OJ" types. Let me see if I get it straight:

1) Prior spousal abuse charges

2) He is black, she was white

3) The cops dont plant evidence or lie in court

Did I miss anything?

156 posted on 12/05/2001 10:22:40 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Benrand; BRL
i hear he also ate a bicep from dahmer's freezer

LOL!!! -- did you know that cloning can help solve world hunger?

157 posted on 12/05/2001 10:23:07 AM PST by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
No, that would be about correct.....
158 posted on 12/05/2001 10:23:57 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
He "never wore those ugly ass shoes"...published pictures wearing them before the murders---also a man polished those shoes with his feet--face in them!

At the summation by Marcia Clark---she said more than anything not the footprints from the bodies but on the carpet of the Bronco was the negative print---the herring-bone marks from between the flat surfaces that was imprinted there---grow a brain---detox!

159 posted on 12/05/2001 10:26:46 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove

The O.J. civil jury was UNANIMOUS, having heard all the evidence presented in the courtroom, of O.J. being the one responsible for the murders. As am I.

P.S. why did he lie about not owning the "ugly @ss shoes?"

CLICK HERE FOR ORDERING INFO

160 posted on 12/05/2001 10:27:09 AM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson