Replies

Thanks for the welcomes. I told Brad's Gramma the other day the Intelligence Quota here is intimidating. Everyone here is so smart.

I have wonderful Catholic friends in real life and also on another internet site. I've learned so much about the faith this past year. They have been educating me. I never realized I had so much in common with Catholics. I do have tremendous respect for their activisim when it comes to pro-life issues. Our crisis pregnancy center in our town is run by Catholics. Oh...and I can't sign off without mentioning how much I love Catholic Charities. I trust them. I'm not Catholic, but I wish more people would donate to them, rather than the Red Cross or the United Way.

And just one more little bitty thing. I don't like the term Crisis Pregnancy. In my thoughts, there is no such thing. Babies are from God and God is not a God of crisis. He wants that baby to be here, whether the mother is unwed or she has 10 kids she can't feed. In this line of thinking, Jesus Christ was a crisis pregnancy. Can you imagine being 14 or 15 years old, and a virgin and having to tell your parents and your husband to be, you are pregnant by the Holy Spirit? If it were me, I would definately consider that a crisis. There is no such thing as a crisis pregnancy. I dislike that term. (Actually there are several "crisis pregnancies" in the Bible).

Anyway, it's late and I talk too much when I'm tired. Good night!

Do you notice --I'm sure you did-- that in post #119, the woman kept referring to her preborn 'thing' as her baby? I wonder, does this compassionate woman realize that more than 40,000 partial birth abortions were registered in America in 1998 (there were doubtless more than twice that many, based on the fetal tissue harvesting business that relies on these healthy late-term fetuses) and that less than 1/2 of 1% were done because of gross fetal abnormality or to save the physical life of the woman?[The tissue harvesters guarantee their client/customers healthy tissue, healthy fetuses, up to the 40th week in gestational age!]

Does it make sense to sanction serial killing of a random sampling of perhaps Chicago, just because on rare occasions a bad guy will get offed and thus the crimes of that individual will be cancelled before they occur? What about the other thousands of serially killed individual human beings that were not criminals; why must they be serially killed just to get at that one baddy?

The leftists societal engineers need the blood rites, to subdue women's voices, that's why they argue for this heinous serial killing method using the most obvious exception as if it were the rule. Sick, very sick! serial killing of 99.99% of the preborn offed with partial birth infanticide, protected just so the exception can be done with full legality. [Here's a hint to those fools who want to argue this #119 case any further: the medical profession could have done the woman's procedure, even if the law passed by the Congress and vetoed by the bloody x42 were in effect against partial birth abortions! And the damn lying leftists know that full and well, but will exploit this woman's case with lies just to keep their serial killing rites of feminist passage protected. And it pisses me off no end that the American people don't appear to give a damn that the feminists and serial killer worshippers continue to lie to the public!] [/rant]