Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY CLINTON -U. S. SENATOR- IS A KEY DEFENDENT IN LORAL SHAREHOLERS CASE ie. CHINAGATE
Judicial Watch ^ | 11/1/01 | Larry Klayman

Posted on 12/01/2001 4:06:05 PM PST by ChaseR

As of 8/08/01, United States Senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton is a co-defendent in the Judicial Watch, Loral Shareholders case. This case was filed in federal court in Washington, D. C. This case formally accuses Senator Hillary Clinton, along with other defendents - of transfering technology to China. Co-defendents in this devastating case include, but are not limited to - William Jefferson Clinton, John Huang and Bernard Schwartz. This case is styled 01-CV-1715.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bernardschwartz; chinagate; clinton; fundraising; hillary; hillaryscandals; judicialwatch; loral; scandals; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 561-570 next last
To: Mudboy Slim
Tell me your NOT the Greybeard with the POW patch on his back!
461 posted on 12/25/2001 6:54:51 AM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Christmas BUMP!
462 posted on 12/25/2001 4:49:05 PM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Christmas BUMP!
463 posted on 12/25/2001 4:49:05 PM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Christmas BUMP!
464 posted on 12/25/2001 4:49:06 PM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Christmas BUMP!
465 posted on 12/25/2001 4:49:07 PM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Christmas BUMP!
466 posted on 12/25/2001 4:49:07 PM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade, ChaseR
"There was no shortage of overall missile defense contracts during the Clinton administration. There was and is a lot of competition for these, among various firms. Sometimes contracts are awarded based on political considerations, as opposed to merit."
Don't know if I could agree with you about the shortage of missle defense program during the Clinton era around '93 but do agree that contracts are awarded based on political consideration moreso than on the merits.
467 posted on 12/25/2001 8:17:37 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

Comment #468 Removed by Moderator

To: DAGO
"Hey MUD BOY SLIME"

Howdy!!

"Since you like to quote people so much and give answers Why is it there is NO ANSWER to the front line, legislation question?"

Please state said "front line, legislation question", would ya please?

"I bet you did buy the Oreilly book for yer self,judging from your posts I find it hard to believe anyone else would buy you anything.It is quite clear to me you use your personality as a means of birth control."

Better watch that razor-sharp wit of yers, DAGO-boy, ya might hurt somebody's feelings.

"I will no longer engage you in this thread..."

My oh my, I shall miss our time together...LOL!!

"ONE MORE THING SLIMEBOY, AS FAR AS GIVING UP IN A FIGHT.....YOU CAN FIND ME IN MINERAL BLUFF GA. ASK ANY BIKER WHERE THE CRAZY GINNIE FROM NY IS,THEY WILL POINT YOU IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION!!! "

Perhaps I'll look you up, CrazyGINNIEfromNY...MUD

469 posted on 12/27/2001 8:30:46 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade; clarity
"Clinton is live bait, but in a very limited context."

I'm no O'Reilly expert and don't claim to be...his show doesn't fit into the regular schedule these days, and I've probably only seen his show 12-15 times. That's why I'm gonna read his book before responding too rashly.

"O'Reilly snipes at Clinton here and there, but when it comes to evidence of serious criminal activity, he backs off."

If so, he is a spineless li'l poltroon, IMHO...but I'll read his book before rendering a Final Verdict...LOL!!

FReegards...MUD

BTW...who the heck's Matt Drudge?!!

470 posted on 12/27/2001 8:36:00 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

Comment #471 Removed by Moderator

To: Alamo-Girl
A belated thank you. (kids out of school the past 10 days -- has limited my usage of our computer/haven't visited this horrendous thread in days!
(A Very Happy New Year to you Alamo-Girl!)
BTTT
472 posted on 01/01/2002 7:18:10 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade; LarryLied; goldilucky; backhoe; poet; flamefront; BeAChooser; KLT
(from your post #418:

"Lim subsequently gave the accident analysis report to China before it was cleared by US security officials."

473 posted on 01/01/2002 7:22:22 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
Jade, in your #418, I tried this link. No Luck. Do you have time to check to see if it's correct. Thanks.

http://www.federal.com/jun23-97/COSCO
418 posted on 12/23/01 10:02 PM Pacific by Black Jade

474 posted on 01/01/2002 7:26:09 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: poet
Thanks for the tunes in your #423/BTTT
475 posted on 01/01/2002 7:27:03 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky; Mudboy Slim
Thanks for the bumps and Happy New Year to the both of ya...(and everyone) - Jeff.
476 posted on 01/01/2002 7:28:49 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
bump for your #440
477 posted on 01/01/2002 7:31:54 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
"I would encourage you to submit hard copies of your evidence - which I believe is 100% damning - and I'm sure they would air it."

Thanks for your continued interest in this grave matter. Yes, I have sent emails and made calls to Rush and to O'Reilly to not avail. (however, before 9/11 - O'Reilly, this past summer, O'Reilly would, once in a while mention the Loral company, but unfortunately, (and I don't know why???) O'Reilly would not elaborate on Loral -and never once did O'Reilly mention this devastating Loral Shareholders case which Judge Lamberth has now accepted into his federal courtroom (as of Aug. 8th)

bttt

478 posted on 01/01/2002 7:37:52 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: DAGO
"Like anything is going to happen."

Patience good friend..../BTTT

479 posted on 01/01/2002 7:39:40 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
May you have the best year ever, ChaseR!!! Hugs!
480 posted on 01/01/2002 7:47:32 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 561-570 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson