Posted on 11/28/2001 1:17:36 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
FEC lawyers recommend giving Dems break on soft-money rules to make up for slow fund raising after attacks
By Sharon Theimer, Associated Press, 11/28/2001 17:03
WASHINGTON (AP) Democrats, arguing their finances have been hit hard by slow fund raising after the terrorist attacks, are getting a sympathetic ear from the Federal Election Commission's lawyers.
FEC attorneys are recommending that the commission grant the Democratic National Committee's request for a break on a ''soft money'' spending rule.
The DNC says it canceled or postponed at least eight fund-raisers in the three weeks after the attacks, depriving it of an anticipated $1.65 million.
Because of that, the DNC wants the commission to extend the amount of time it and other fund-raising committees have to cover operating expenses using soft-money campaign contributions.
The commission plans to consider the request and the FEC lawyers' recommendation Thursday.
Soft money contributions can be made in unlimited amounts, but there are limits on how party committees such as the DNC and its Republican counterpart can spend them.
The Republican National Committee has not commented to the FEC on the Democrats' request. Asked whether the GOP would take advantage of an extension, spokesman Trent Duffy said no decision had been made.
While both major parties are prolific soft-money raisers, the Democrats tend to rely more heavily on it, while the GOP typically has a ''hard-money'' advantage.
When it comes to operating expenses, party committees are allowed to first cover the cost using hard money, donations that are limited in size but can be spent by recipients in any way.
They can then reimburse themselves for 40 percent of those expenses using soft money.
Party committees now have 60 days to make the reimbursement. The DNC wants the FEC to extend the time limit to 120 days.
That would give it until March 1 to use soft money for expenses incurred through the end of this year. The DNC says most of the contributions it would have taken in at the fund-raisers would have been soft money.
The commission's lawyers say that rather than temporarily waiving the rule, the FEC should simply stop enforcing it for transfers until March 1. Campaign-finance watchdog groups including Common Cause, Democracy 21 and the Center for Responsive Politics oppose the DNC's request.
The groups feel soft money allows special interests to wield undue political influence and should be banned rather than given what they view as another loophole.
The FEC is ''talking about not enforcing a lawfully enacted rule they made, and publicly announcing that they will not enforce that rule, and that is wrong,'' said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics and former general counsel for the commission.
Noble said the DNC has failed to show it is facing a funding emergency due to the terrorist attacks.
DNC attorney Joseph Sandler said the commission has used discretion in enforcing its rules before. He said the DNC has proved hardship and is seeking relief through a request that deals only with the timing of transfers between party accounts, not the overall amount of soft money that a party can spend.
On the Net:
Federal Election Commission: http://www.fec.gov/
Democratic National Committee:
http://www.democrats.org/
Republican National Committee: http://www.rnc.org/
Pre-9/11 all the manure that they put out might have worked. I doubt that they could have taken back the House pre-9/11, but they would have done some damage. Post 9/11 all their slow methodic move to socialism have gone straight down the toilet. They know this! So, they want to start changing the rules, all the rules! This no different from what they attempted (and are still moaning about) in FLA in the 2K election. These people are very dangerous when they are wounded and beaten. Watch them even closer now than we ever have. Short of armed insurrection (remember, we conservatives have all the guns) they will try anything.
Sheesh !!!!!!! This is absolutely insane!!!!
Someone, Please, Just Say NO!!!!!
Reality check..
HEY GOP!!!!You are acting like puppies lined up waiting to suckle at the teats of your Mama (whose name is dasshole).
minor correction: 'who knows if they think'
minor correction: 'who knows if they think'
They didn't 'decide' not to raise funds! In the marketplace of ideas, they are just bankrupt, and their fundraising attempts reflect this!
There's not an ounce of integrity among the whole lot of them.
I have no idea. My comment in #10 was simply what Political Money Line posted today.
Care to share what you know about this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.