Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC lawyers recommend giving Dems break on soft-money rules to make up for slow fund raising after
AP | 11/28/01 | Sharon Theimer

Posted on 11/28/2001 1:17:36 PM PST by Native American Female Vet

FEC lawyers recommend giving Dems break on soft-money rules to make up for slow fund raising after attacks

By Sharon Theimer, Associated Press, 11/28/2001 17:03

WASHINGTON (AP) Democrats, arguing their finances have been hit hard by slow fund raising after the terrorist attacks, are getting a sympathetic ear from the Federal Election Commission's lawyers.

FEC attorneys are recommending that the commission grant the Democratic National Committee's request for a break on a ''soft money'' spending rule.

The DNC says it canceled or postponed at least eight fund-raisers in the three weeks after the attacks, depriving it of an anticipated $1.65 million.

Because of that, the DNC wants the commission to extend the amount of time it and other fund-raising committees have to cover operating expenses using soft-money campaign contributions.

The commission plans to consider the request and the FEC lawyers' recommendation Thursday.

Soft money contributions can be made in unlimited amounts, but there are limits on how party committees such as the DNC and its Republican counterpart can spend them.

The Republican National Committee has not commented to the FEC on the Democrats' request. Asked whether the GOP would take advantage of an extension, spokesman Trent Duffy said no decision had been made.

While both major parties are prolific soft-money raisers, the Democrats tend to rely more heavily on it, while the GOP typically has a ''hard-money'' advantage.

When it comes to operating expenses, party committees are allowed to first cover the cost using hard money, donations that are limited in size but can be spent by recipients in any way.

They can then reimburse themselves for 40 percent of those expenses using soft money.

Party committees now have 60 days to make the reimbursement. The DNC wants the FEC to extend the time limit to 120 days.

That would give it until March 1 to use soft money for expenses incurred through the end of this year. The DNC says most of the contributions it would have taken in at the fund-raisers would have been soft money.

The commission's lawyers say that rather than temporarily waiving the rule, the FEC should simply stop enforcing it for transfers until March 1. Campaign-finance watchdog groups including Common Cause, Democracy 21 and the Center for Responsive Politics oppose the DNC's request.

The groups feel soft money allows special interests to wield undue political influence and should be banned rather than given what they view as another loophole.

The FEC is ''talking about not enforcing a lawfully enacted rule they made, and publicly announcing that they will not enforce that rule, and that is wrong,'' said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics and former general counsel for the commission.

Noble said the DNC has failed to show it is facing a funding emergency due to the terrorist attacks.

DNC attorney Joseph Sandler said the commission has used discretion in enforcing its rules before. He said the DNC has proved hardship and is seeking relief through a request that deals only with the timing of transfers between party accounts, not the overall amount of soft money that a party can spend.

On the Net:

Federal Election Commission: http://www.fec.gov/

Democratic National Committee:

http://www.democrats.org/

Republican National Committee: http://www.rnc.org/


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 11/28/2001 1:17:37 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
FEC lawyers recommend giving Dems break on soft-money rules to make up for slow fund raising after attacks

No doubt they are VERY ANGRY at Republicans for having somewhat better luck raising funds.

Thank G-d for that nonpartisan FEC! We really should put them completely in control of all political speech, like Senator McCainiac wants.

2 posted on 11/28/2001 1:22:05 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
FEC attorneys are recommending that the commission grant the Democratic National Committee's request for a break on a ''soft money'' spending rule.

Were these FEC lawyers hired by the Clinton administration? Can they be fired or overruled by the Executive Branch? The Democrats made decisions not to fundraise; they must then be willing to suffer the consequences of their actions.
3 posted on 11/28/2001 1:22:44 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
The RNC is so out of touch. They should be making a big public issue of this.
4 posted on 11/28/2001 1:24:17 PM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
I read this three times and I'm still stunned.

I wonder what McCain and Feingold think of this.

5 posted on 11/28/2001 1:26:13 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
You have got to be kidding.
6 posted on 11/28/2001 1:27:44 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
The RNC is so out of touch.

I don't think they care at all about grass roots opinion. All they seem good at is sending me 100 donation requests each year.

7 posted on 11/28/2001 1:28:09 PM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Democrats, arguing their finances have been hit hard by slow fund raising after the terrorist attacks, are getting a sympathetic ear from the Federal Election Commission's lawyers

I see. Their point of view loses credibility and thus their party loses capital. Sounds like the free market at work to me.. Should be no suprise that they now don't want to live by the rules they imposed on everyone else. How Clintonian.

8 posted on 11/28/2001 1:30:20 PM PST by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
The DNC says it canceled or postponed at least eight fund-raisers in the three weeks after the attacks, depriving it of an anticipated $1.65 million.

The RNC cancelled fundraisers too. This is insane.

Who controls the FEC?

9 posted on 11/28/2001 1:32:13 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
From Political Money Line:

Surprise Nomination To FEC

(Does Darryl know yet?)
Michael E. Toner, Chief Counsel to the
Republican National Committee and
former General Counsel to the Transition
Team for President George W. Bush and
former General Counsel for the Bush for
President campaign, is about to be nominated
to replace Darryl Wold as one of six
commissioners at the FEC. Word has it that
Mr. Wold was enjoying his stay at the FEC.

10 posted on 11/28/2001 1:34:04 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Native American Female Vet
I am stunned... Republicans don;t have the advantage of the illegal giving by unions. Might we now expect some consideration be given to "sharing" the funds? After all, we all want to be fair. Is there NOTHING liberals haven't diseased?
14 posted on 11/28/2001 1:42:11 PM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet; CommiesOut
bump
15 posted on 11/28/2001 1:44:09 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
No, no, no. Stop the RAT fundraising altogether.
16 posted on 11/28/2001 1:44:13 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Here are the Members of the Federal Election Commission Danny L. McDonald, Chairman:
First appointed bt Reagan, kept by Clinon and Bush

David M. Mason, Vice Chairman
Since 1998, Appointed by Clinton

Karl J. Sandstrom
Since 98, appointed by Clinton

Bradley A. Smith
Since Feb 2000, appointed by Clinton

Scott E. Thomas
Since 1975

Darryl R. Wold
Since 98, appointed by Clinton

17 posted on 11/28/2001 1:46:28 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Yes they should.
18 posted on 11/28/2001 1:49:59 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I could not beleive I was reading what I was either.

McCain and Feingold..... who knows what or how they think :-)

19 posted on 11/28/2001 1:52:45 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
No kidding. Nothing on the FEC site about it.
20 posted on 11/28/2001 1:53:52 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson