Posted on 11/26/2001 2:49:05 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
Rhetorical Questions to myself and other Catholic Apologists here:
After reading numerous threads of what I term the "Freeper Wars," I'm going to state an assumption (which might well be terribly wrong) then ask a few rhetorical questions.
If a "Freeper Wars" thread (you know the type, starts out as a thread of interest to Catholic freepers, then turns into the standard anti-Catholic posts with attempts to defend the faith by the regular Catholic Apologists here) is several days old and several hundred posts long, the "undecided" will be few.
Your apologetics are not intended to convert those whose hearts and minds are closed (although, by the Grace of God it does indeed happen). They are intended to illuminate the intellect and soul of those still open to Truth, and still willing to learn. I doubt that many of those make it to that point in threads here, i.e., when threads are 200 to 300 posts or longer, several days old, etc.
Therefore, your time is being spent only on those you are directly responding to, when they do their own self search.
Is that an effective use of your time and talent? Or would prayer, not words, be more effective at this point? Are we trying to win souls, or points of debate?
Just a few thoughts I ask myself constantly on these types of threads, i.e., where is my time better spent, reading to my kids and spending time with my spouse, or trying to convert those late on a thread whose minds and hearts are hardened? Are there enough lurkers late in a thread to make it worth the amount of time and intense effort to defend the faith that these threads usually entail late in their usual progression?
Actually, that's the only problem I had with Lewis. ;-)
Going by your definition, any denomination that allows women ministers, does not take a HARD stand on abortion, pussy-foots with homosexuals, etc, is a cult.
You are saying that Lutherans, Epsiscopalians, Presbyterians, Methodists, and Baptists are cults?
The only thing that is important is my relationship with Jesus Christ, everthing else is just people stuff.
I believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross for my sins, and believe that Jesus christ is my Lord anbd Saviour and is the ONLY way to salvation.
What else is there, really? Do you mean I am not doing it right?
Unless we all belong to whatever church you belong to, we are all going to hell?
Is it salvation through "packrat01" ? Oh, my, I had better start following you!
Hey, even the great C.S. couldn't please everyone. :)
[But, then, I think he was only trying to please One...]
I'll give you everything but this one. There are women who are decons and elders in the New Testament.
Shalom.
In fact, may I point out that Scott Hahn did nothing to keep me in the Catholic Church in the long run? Sure, it was great to see/hear him speak, along with Steve Wood, and others. I appreciate their pro-life work, along with HLI. We still have a lot of stuff by Hahn and Wood. Finally.......someone who could preach something other than the love-everybody pap we were getting in our local Catholic Church. :(
In the end, however, regardless of how charming the speakers were, regardless of how they seemed to know the subject matter, I still grew to disbelieve. I just cannot believe dogmas created from obscure passages of scripure.
We practically had a Catholic library, attended Mass daily ("Is he following the rubrics? Is this mass valid?" sigh), said the rosary, loved my Mary statues ("Isn't "she" beautiful?"), homeschooled with Seton one year.........
I just don't believe that the Catholic Church is the one true church. If the Catholic Church is the one true church that never changes, Vatican II certainly changed it. According to VII, people of goodwill who do not know the Lord "may" be saved, but anyone who knows the truth, but rejects it (me?), may not be saved. This is certainly a change from previous councils. At one time, no one outside the church could be saved. Then, we had the "lifeboat" theory. I know. I know....."understanding" grew. Well, the councils were not silent while "understanding" grew. They made some pretty clear declarations on "who" was anathema and who wasn't. Frankly, there have been other "changes" in the unchanging church as well.....but hints of universalism was a biggie, in my book. And if the church post Vatican II isn't the one true church, where is it?
And no, that's not the reason we left. The universalism thing is only a minor blip on the screen. I simply couldn't figure out why any Jew would have wanted to change one system for another. Where was the "gospel", the "good news?" Frankly, I would have found it easier simply to remain a Jew, than to commit to what the "true church" had become. If one really believes in pergatory, and really believes in indulgences, one can certainly become entrapped in a system of getting time off for kissing one's bible, saying the rosary, etc., etc. And if that stuff really "works", one would be a fool not to avail oneself of every indulgence available. Of course, I never believed to that point. I know many who did, however.
I write with no anomosity. I hope you are not reading sarcasm into my message. There is none.
BINGO!!!
I think focussing on the faults of institutions and individuals can blind people to the good they may have done, but the good may be more important. All institutions and individuals are faulty or sinful, but some have done a lot of good and that's not easy in this world.
Please do point out the women elders in the New Testament. As far as women deacons, yes I do believe there were women deacons. However, while deacons and elders both share a common service to their Lord, only elders have responsibility for leadership. That's a mighty big difference. And if your passage is just a might "questionable".......well, Jesus made it pretty clear that he chose only men to lead. Have a nice day. :) Shalom.
So you're Catholic then? ;)
So sorry, couldn't resist.
Shalom.
Ah, yes, but that is far different from a "minister, pastor, or priest"
A women is not supposed to be the one to lead a congregation.
(I'm at work and don't have my Bible Concordance with me, so I'm shy of scripture refs).
You are probably right Jim as a "former Catholic" I know the error first hand and I fear for the souls bound by Rome.
So many very good people..that I really like..are going to hell out of ignorance or pride..
I'm not sure this is relevant. In the end times, the only church that true believers will want to attend will be those that are dying. Popular churches will be those that tickle the ears of the attenders without teaching any of the true doctrine of the faith.
You've got to be kidding. You really believe the Evangelical churches tickle the listeners ears?? You get a much more "watered down, easy listening" gospel at any Catholic church than at any Evangelical church. 20 minute quickie masses versus 2-3 hour services twice on Sundays, etc. Much stricter list of dos and donts. Need I go on?
Your God and my God are very different. Your God will go out with a whimper.
My God will go out with a tremendous, final, last outpouring of His Spirit, to keep as many as possible from perishing. My God will live up to his promise given in the following: "But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound". As wickedness increases in these last days, (as we both agree) so will his grace.
Actually, the Catholic calendar is the only thing I miss about Catholicism. My church doesn't really have a clear Lent and Advent. I do miss the seasons of the church. That's about it, I'm afraid.
Women "deacons" were chosen to work with the women among the people in the matter of
baptisms and such as it was regarded as unseemly for men to to put their hands on the women.
Very early baptisms of adults were done by immersion which requires more hands-on
than does sprinkling or placing a hands on heads.
My pastor just did a two week indepth study on morality (fornication, adultery) becuase one of our members just left his wife. He has been expelled from the community of believers, with the admonition that we are to continue to love him and pray for his return.
There is nothing in my church that tickles the ears.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.