Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waiting in the weeds: Bill O'Reilly warns media snipers preparing to denigrate Dubya's competence
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, November 22, 2001 Thanksgiving Day | Bill O'Reilly

Posted on 11/21/2001 11:09:34 PM PST by JohnHuang2

With the Afghan war going exceedingly well and his approval rating hovering around 80 percent, President Bush has to be one happy Thanksgiving guy. Thus far, he has risen to the occasion – directing what could turn out to be the most successful military operation of the 21st century. America's cause is just, and the bad guys keep falling without many U.S. casualties.

But hiding in the weeds, biding its time, is an enemy with its sights trained on Mr. Bush. This is the same foe that ambushed Bush's father in the early '90s and President Clinton throughout his tenure in office. This covert enemy lives to bring down the powerful and successful, and the attackers don't need bombs, anthrax or bullets. They use ink and innuendo.

It is a sad fact of life in America that the more successful one becomes, the more media snipers appear to blow your figurative brains out. I've already noticed the first ammunition being loaded against President Bush. The media assault will question his compassion as more Americans lose their jobs in the recession. The strategy will be to portray Mr. Bush's economic stimulus package as ignoring poor and working Americans, by backing corporate tax breaks. Never mind that in order for the economy to rebound, corporations must be persuaded to begin spending again. That will not be mentioned. As soon as the war on terror subsides, Bush's alleged heartlessness will be played up big. You can take this to the bank.

Choking the powerful has become a blood sport in America, take it from me. By some mysterious quirk of fate, your humble correspondent has become a media success much to the dismay of many. The more high profile I become – the more vicious and personal the attacks on me get. Recently, Matt Drudge actually accused me of wanting to do a radio program to exploit Rush Limbaugh's deafness – an erroneous charge so vitriolic it took my breath away.

For the first time, I now truly understand what people like the Bushes and the Clintons have to deal with. Once in power, you can insulate yourself to a degree, but the hateful arrows will still fly and there's nothing anyone can do to stop them.

Of course, the Clintons brought many of the attacks on themselves by behaving badly. But the assaults would have arrived anyway. Once some in the media get a taste of blood, sharks tremble.

So I hope George W. Bush is preparing himself. A grateful America honored his father after the Gulf War, but the party ended long before midnight. A once-invincible president was battered and pilloried as a man who didn't know the price of milk – a man who didn't care about the regular folks.

That perception accomplished, many in the media took glee in watching the fast talker from Arkansas verbally dance his way into the White House, while the low-key blueblood from Connecticut could never shake the "out of touch" tag.

George W. Bush witnessed that media sniper parade first-hand and saw it bring down his father's administration. Mr. Bush must know the same enemy is waiting in the weeds again. Patiently, his foes are polishing generalizations of insensitivity and domestic incompetence. Ready for when the time is right to fire those flaming arrows directly into the Bush courtyard.

As the philosopher Rod Serling once said, "There's a sign post up ahead." That sign post may well spell big trouble for President Bush.


Related offers:

Purchase a copy of Bill O'Reilly's new book, "No Spin Zone," autographed and personalized, and receive a free "No Spin Zone" bumper sticker and a free three-month trial offer to Whistleblower magazine.

Check out WorldNetDaily's full line of Bill O'Reilly products at ShopNetDaily.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccrm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: *CCRM; JohnHuang2
I'm afraid that Bill O'Reilly has really nailed it. It's time for all liberty-loving Americans to do all they can to keep in check the wounded but still powerful news media. I have no doubts that most are waiting for the opportunity to strike against Bush and to simultaneously start spinning for whoever appears to be the Democratic successor to X42.

Regarding Bush-41, the media was his worst enemy. I once saw a video presentation of the strategies used by the media day after day, making the economy look far worse than it was and downplaying the many signs that the economy was recovering. No candidate ever had it as easy as the slickmeister from Arkansas had it.

21 posted on 11/22/2001 6:28:37 AM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"For the first time, I now truly understand what people like the Bushes and the Clintons have to deal with."
Here we go again, with O'Reilly setting no distinction between Bush and Clinton. Yeah, I read the next paragraph when he tries to justify it, but it cannot be justified. A moral commander in chief is incommensurable with a world class CRIMINAL.
22 posted on 11/22/2001 6:33:57 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: semper_libertas; Cachelot
for providing military deployment info that could threaten military lives.

Thank you, semper_libertas. There's also the charges of giving aid and comfort to the enemy and sedition. I hadn't thought an explanation necessary when I posted. Obviously, the obvious escapes some folks.

24 posted on 11/22/2001 7:05:26 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
You might want to check on just how few Americans actually watch Jennings, or Rather, or Brokaw. Without looking myself, I would guesstimate no more than 10 million combined. And their viewership is probably mostly left wing activists, college professors, high school teachers and the like. I n a land of 280 million, thats peanuts.
25 posted on 11/22/2001 7:10:30 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
Bump.
26 posted on 11/22/2001 7:16:44 AM PST by JusPasenThru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Obviously, the obvious escapes some folks.

Obviously, you didn't really read what you were referring to in your haste to post. This is what you said:

asking if certain statements they are making against the Administration/Bush is treasonous, etc.

"Making statements against the Adimistration/Bush" is a very, very far cry from what is actually the issue here. If not, there is a considerable problem.

27 posted on 11/22/2001 7:27:50 AM PST by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All
The wife noticed how W cut a nice slice of turkey. Said ... "did you see that? his technique is perfect."

I guess women notice these things.

I would prefer a nice thin slice of liberal, but you can't have everything.

snooker

28 posted on 11/22/2001 7:28:42 AM PST by tarpon_bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
the more media snipers appear to blow your figurative brains out.

And what can we do about this? Turnabout is fair play. Whe are these media snipers? Do they always behave themselves? Are they faithfull to their spouses? Have they ever done anything wrong?

If they use these tactics on the President, they should be prepared to face the same on their personal lives. They are public, though un-elected figures.

I cannot help remembering the DUI charge that surfaced about W just a few days before the election - not time enough for a reasoned defence of the charges. So unfair!

No wonder many of us hold the "mainstream media" in utter contempt!

29 posted on 11/22/2001 7:29:50 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
how few Americans actually watch Jennings, or Rather, or Brokaw

Many, however, watch Katie Kuric, or Matt Liar. If that's not convenient (or entertaining enough), they go to Rosie "attack Selleck" O'Donnell, Oprah, etc., where their views are just as liberal. I haven't seen any recent studies on what news shows Americans watch, but I bet it's predominantly liberal. There's also print media, where most of the newspapers (not all, of course) are also liberal. I don't know, kind of hard to get around the socialist/commie propaganda unless you intentionally avoid it (as I generally do now since the attempted coup in November and felt disgusted by the liberal talking heads).

30 posted on 11/22/2001 7:29:53 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Never, ever, ever believe a lyin' Democrat! And never, ever, ever believe Trent Lott!
31 posted on 11/22/2001 7:36:45 AM PST by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"felt disgusted by the liberal talking heads"
No argument there. I do believe though, that the Texan who spoke up to Jennings was a much more representative slice of Americana than some might choose to believe. Only about 20% of America is solidly to the left. I know....thats too damned many. LOL
32 posted on 11/22/2001 7:39:03 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"Many, however, watch Katie Kuric, or Matt Liar. If that's not convenient (or entertaining enough), they go to Rosie "
Those who watch these imbiciles are "lost causes"
33 posted on 11/22/2001 7:42:29 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The difference, Bill, is that Clinton is a criminal.
34 posted on 11/22/2001 7:49:46 AM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Thank you, suh!!
35 posted on 11/22/2001 7:56:06 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I used to think O'Reilly was the cat's meow. The more I have watched him the more I realize he is much like other journalists. He has his own agenda too.

He's has a know-it-all big-mouthed attitude like some liberal journalists. And he seems to seldom touch issues regarding Bush that concern Americans.

36 posted on 11/22/2001 8:08:31 AM PST by Aerial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
We are praying daily for President Bush, and he shall not fail.

Clintoon had no prayers, because no one who believes in God believes in Clintoon.

37 posted on 11/22/2001 8:13:35 AM PST by angry elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: MistrX
Who is Trent Lott?
39 posted on 11/22/2001 9:28:46 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
I see you have a lot more in common with the emperor than Darth Vader:

"The emperor is not as forgiving than I am."

40 posted on 11/22/2001 9:34:10 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson