Posted on 11/21/2001 8:13:35 AM PST by marshmallow
We parents still don't get it. We still don't understand that our children live in a reality steeped in violence, sex and the occult, and that they move and breathe and have their being in a culture we would not have recognized even fifteen years ago, one that has caused them untold harm.
We also don't get the fact that the series of Harry Potter books, lauded by educators and parents, and bemusedly encouraged by religious commentators (except fundamentalists), not only propagates occultism, but offers advanced indoctrination into it.
That said, if we step back from the controversy and look closely enough, the series can offer us deep insights into the collective psyches of our and our childrens' generations, both benumbed by addictions to fantasy, both psychologically stunted and ignorant of spiritual truths.
Before my audience is lost too, considering me a fear-mongering, fundamentalist, unimaginative critic of the series, may I introduce myself as a former New Age "healer" and advanced yoga practitioner. Many of the delightfully described magical arts in the Harry Potter series were pretty standard fare in training courses I mastered to some degree or another, including telepathy, divination, energy-work, necromancy, geomancy and time travel, to name but a few. I was quite close friends with wizards, warlocks and witches alike - all of us (psychologists, physicists, & other professionals) being in the business of the new science of the mind, defending our studies together as being of the white magic category, much like the wizardry school of Harry Potter. So, for those readers who believe Harry Potter's world to be a harmless fantasy or the science of magic to be the stuff of educative fairy tales, let me dispel those myths (no pun or magic intended) right up front. And also let me disabuse commentators of the notion that there are two kinds of magic, however humorously depicted. There is one kind: variously known as black magic, occultism, diabolism, or the dark arts.
And while I am a revert to the Roman Catholic faith, I write about New Age topics out of first-hand experience and by way of admonition, not fear. I'd rather not have others suffer, as I did, from exposure to the occult. To the charge of fear-mongering, well, fear-mongering is not my cup of tea, although I enjoy using the word. I love words. I love fantasy and science fiction and C. S. Lewis and Bradbury and Clarke and oh so many other writers who filled my mind with wonder as a child, and yes, provided much pleasure at breaking the bonds of my mundane, grown-up infested universe. Truth be told, I graduated from these authors in my early teens into more meaty topics such as ESP, ghost hunting and parapsychology, experimenting with Ouiji boards, telepathy games, and automatic writing.
Truth also be told, I, like Harry, was also alienated from my caregivers, parents in emotional trouble from years of marital separation. These books fueled my need to have some control over my out-of-control emotional world, they made me feel that there was a way to escape, to be free, to fly. I was not so very different from other children of my era who haunted libraries and escaped through T.V. and who later became the perpetual adolescents of the '90s. Neither was I so different from our children today, who now, more than ever, lack control in their lives and need to feel in control of their inner turmoil amidst divorce, latchkey-ism, and out-of-control classrooms.
It's not hard for either of us, parents or kids, to enjoy the marvelous writing skills of J.K. Rowling, being swept up by her characters and plots - made all the more delicious because they are portrayed as part and parcel of the real world. The words found in Harry Potter are endearing and all-together enjoyable. Their effect is another matter, precisely because of the wizard world's use of real world magic, as well as our children's close identification with Harry and their predisposition, wrought by over exposure to television, to attaching themselves to his world. I frequently recall an unattributed quote that reminds me of my descent into the New Age and also of the future fate of children inured to the occult world found in Harry Potter.
Watch your thoughts; they become words.
Watch your words; they become actions.
Watch your actions; they become habits.
Watch your habits; they become character.
Watch your character; it becomes your destiny.
Harry Potter, to my mind, gives children a far from superficial exposure to the use of magic. It makes it fun and equates the learning of it with moral rectitude. "Fiddle sticks", you opine, "Harry Potter teaches marvelous lessons, showing real life situations couched in harmless fantasy, to educate my children in ethics. And besides, I really enjoy reading it to them as they remind me of Tolkein's and Lewis's fantasy worlds!"
To the charge that Harry Potter teaches children moral lessons, I would heartily agree it does promulgate lessons - but of the wrong kind. In Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, for example, Harry magically attacks a troublesome aunt by causing her to blow up like a balloon - with no repercussions. One of his teachers becomes an allay to Harry, relating to him on the same level, showing a decided blurring of personal boundaries not uncommon is today's high schools. Emotion-sucking ghouls are depicted as handy prison guards and the scenes of their near possessive attacks on children are uncannily real. No clear cut right and wrong lines here
Perhaps the most revelatory aspect of the series is that Harry and the rest of the wizard cohort view all non-magical adults, called "Muggles", as stupid, antagonistic and not to be trusted. The entire Muggle world is looked upon as archaic, even grossly ignorant - much the same way I viewed the orthodox religious world during my time in the New Age. And if defenders of the series supposed this to be a harmless conceit, they need look no further than the author's own admonition to children in an interview of her conducted by Scholastic (www. scholastic.com). When asked to give a few closing words of advice to children, Rowling warned, "Don't let the Muggles get you down." Far from being an innocent magical spoof like the film "Princess Bride", Potter magic is all too real and all too harmful.
Which brings us to the author. Who is she? A former teacher, single parent and a long-time lover of books, we feel she is an underdog of sorts. A close reading of one of the books in the series, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, however, by the eyes of a former occultist like myself, reveals her more than cursory familiarity with the occult. One character is named Vablatsky (a play on the name of Madame Blavatsky, a theosophist of the 19th century). A class in "Transfiguration" (regardless of its sacrilegious context for us Muggles) also hints at familiarity with the "New Age" belief in stages of enlightenment, including that of "transfiguration". A closer reading might also reveal a woman author plagued by the perpetual adolescence of the rest of her generation and with very probable extracurricular interests in the occult.
Why has Rowling so captured our imaginations? Harry Potter books are a direct window into a preternatural middle school society governed by control and manipulation - which is why it is so appealing to us in our topsy-turvy adolescent culture. To have a map where we can see people moving around us, to point an effective wand at depression-inducing ghouls, to be able to disappear under an invisibility cloak are all salves to our fearful psyches. On the surface, these exercises are a harmless cathartic, but, unfortunately, in today's world, they are only blueprints for children to become further detached from us.
A case in point is Wheaton College, where Alan Jacobs, author of a favorable review of Harry Potter in First Things, works as a professor. A look at Wheaton College web site will yield a community link to local religious organizations including a well published alchemy group called "Philosophers of Nature". In his review, Professor Jacobs likens the science of wizardry to the "technology" of the science of alchemy. Other faculty members at Wheaton seem to have some fascinating academic interests including a course on witchcraft offered by Candice Hogan and a Professor Owens who advertises an interest in the politics of ritual and sacrifice. Well, it would seem we Muggles have our very own schools of wizardry, which are, unfortunately, not uncommon in academia, higher or middle, where professors are as adolescent as their students, a la Harry Potter. Another case in point is a local Catholic nun in my community who runs a youth camp and advertises solstice rituals in our church bulletins for kids to enjoy. A Reiki healing group, also linked to a local nun, is associated with our public hospital. Reiki is a newer version of ritual Tantric magic.
In our post-Christian culture, the occult sciences have gained legitimacy under the rubric of energy technology. This emphasis on technique and technology stems from the industrial revolution and the belief in Hegel's perfectibility of man. This concept of the perfect man, seized upon by Hitler to justify a super race, is now finding ascendancy in the self actualization movement know as the New Age. Hitler's Nazi elite were themselves victims as children of what is now termed radical attachment disorder, having been the product of "new" thinking in strict and antiseptic child rearing techniques. These children later grew into conscience-less supermen with no hearts.
Attachment disorder is much talked about these days, the latest in clinical diagnoses, applied to such horrors as the mass murderers of Columbine. These are youth that never attached emotionally to a parent, either through multiple primary care givers, neglect or abuse. These children suffer a core rage and an inability to develop normal moral scruples. They are children who often seek out violence and the occult to gain control and to channel their rage. Is there no truer representation of this than our orphan Harry when he points his weapon of magic in rage at his aunt, or when he stands in a dark "haunted" house confused as to who exactly killed his parents and if he should kill him too?
Scripture (excuse the reference) repeatedly refers to violence as the fruit and destiny of the unjust and their children. Our society condones violence, promiscuous sex and the occult on every side. We walk on a real world soil covered with the blood of millions and millions of aborted children, the ultimate victims of attachment disorder. And yet we remain in consummate denial, remaining addicted to a violent media, occult gaming and books like Harry Potter.
As my sister wrote to a young family, friends of hers, who are big fans of the Harry Potter series, "the fallacy that magic is good is the chief temptation for entry into the occult. Palmistry, astrology, fortune telling, and divining are all of them objectively evil things and sinful to indulge in. They are violations of the First Commandment. The Church has always warned people not to give them attention and to actively avoid them, as they are powerful and seductive temptations. Why, then, familiarize and desensitize your children to them by a deep and attractive exposure to their supposed neutral use for good? I had originally thought that the world of Harry Potter was an alternate universe with a made up symbolic magic, much like Narnia. In that case, I was prepared to see critics of the books as people who saw Satan under every bed. But that is not the case with the Potter universe, which is our world with our common occult practices."
As magic is to fantasy, so miracles are to our very unhealed world. Our children deserve better than this. Why not soar with them by reading about the flying saints, like Teresa of Avila or Teresita de los Andes? Why not bilocate with them on the spiritual missions of Padre Pio or St. Faustina? Why not read to them about crippled children who run at Lourdes or pray with them fantastically efficacious prayers that heal and deliver? Our faith provides all these marvelous tokens of true power for which our children are starving. We just need to be home long enough, and spend time enough with them, and protect them clearly enough from false ideas to teach them the wonders of their faith. Harry Potter and our children don't need magic. They need love and the miracle of Jesus in the Eucharist and yes, their parents, to keep them safe and secure and filled with true wonder. So do we.
It's all baloney to me.
Nicely demonstrating my point about you, but revealing nothing about either the Bible or Christians.
In other words, your typical "contribution" in such discussions: $000.00, generously estimated.
Dan
But I always find it amazing that people who spend so much of their time studying the Bible know so little about Christianity.
The idea that the earth is a battleground between good and evil, with God on one side and Satan on the other, is not a Christian one - it is a pagan idea that Christianity rejected long ago.
Harry Potter may have paganist undertones, but the anti-witchcraft rants have paganist undertones as well.
Outside of Harry's mean Aunt, Uncle and Cousin, there was almost no character development. There's no one, single toy that kids are going to run screaming, through the stores, that they want, if they've only seen the movie. (Maybe that's a relief to some parents.)
Norbert the dragon hatches out his egg and is then banished to Romania by Headmaster Dumbledore. What was that? I shed my first tear of the movie for Mattel at that point. Who's going to buy all those $40 dollar electronic "Norbert the dragon" toys after that?
Harry's final confrontation with Lord Voldemort is a real yawner. The whole rest of the movie was about as lively as a museum tour.
I guess you can tell I was real disappointed. I was looking forward to being entertained.
They paid a tremendous actor like Richard Harris to play Headmaster Dumbledore and then they use him like a display window mannequin. He had no lines.
The images of Harry's parents say nothing. The only two adult actors whose performances I somewhat enjoyed were those portraying Hagrid and Professor Snape.
It's as if they shot the movie and then they let their competition from Pixxar make the final cuts, so they wouldn't feel guilty about killing Monsters Inc. at the box office.
I hope I didn't spoil the movie for anyone that hasn't seen it yet, but I'm curious to see what others, who have seen the movie, thought. Am I being overly critical?
This reminded me of Kevin Kostner's debacle "Water World". How did Chris Columbus make a mediocre to bad movie with $160 million dollars to spend?
Wyldkard, I do have the ability to look it up. I thought your reference was from the Old Testament, but that you might have something from the New Testament that wasn't Mosaic Law meant for the Jewish people. When Jesus came, the Law, which included limiting travel on the Sabbath and blood sacrifices (or do Jews still practice that?) was replaced by God's Salvation. When Jesus said, "...He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her." (John 8:7), He changed the letter of the Law into the spirit of the Law.
As to the "Crucifixion Psalm", the word "pierced" being determined by 72 rabbis as the correct translation tells me that even among Jewish scholars there's a difference of opinion. Nevertheless, the whole of the Psalm, even with the "lion" interpretation is still a clear reference to the Crucifixion. Jesus knew His Scriptures and knew those who studied it would understand that He was fulfilling it.
It was most interesting to read what the rabbi thought was anti-Semitic from Martin Luther and interesting to see how anti-Christian he was in his response to the Lutheran minister. It goes both ways, although the Lutheran minister never wrote anything in the least anti-Semitic to Rabbi Singer, who still didn't understand that true Christians do not hate the Jews. He preferred to cite anti-Semites who claimed to be Christian as his proof to the contrary. It was most enlightening. Thank you for the link.
Do you have a reference for the abomination-less verses? I would be interested to read the wording, if you do. I regret that I cannot read Hebrew, Greek or Latin. It would certainly be better for my own edification, not to mention discussions, if I could. I will just have to see what I can do about that.
As to Lev. 15, it deals with both men and women having a discharge, not just a woman's cycle.
I appreciate the chance to discuss this with you.
Helloooooooooooooo?
A case in point is Wheaton College, where Alan Jacobs, author of a favorable review of Harry Potter in First Things, works as a professor. A look at Wheaton College web site will yield a community link to local religious organizations including a well published alchemy group called "Philosophers of Nature". In his review, Professor Jacobs likens the science of wizardry to the "technology" of the science of alchemy. Other faculty members at Wheaton seem to have some fascinating academic interests including a course on witchcraft offered by Candice Hogan and a Professor Owens who advertises an interest in the politics of ritual and sacrifice. Well, it would seem we Muggles have our very own schools of wizardry, which are, unfortunately, not uncommon in academia, higher or middle, where professors are as adolescent as their students, a la Harry Potter. Another case in point is a local Catholic nun in my community who runs a youth camp and advertises solstice rituals in our church bulletins for kids to enjoy. A Reiki healing group, also linked to a local nun, is associated with our public hospital. Reiki is a newer version of ritual Tantric magic.
I thought that review in First Things smelled.
Maybe you should expand on "death education" for the uninitiated.
You must have learned your grammar in publik skool.
Many of the delightfully described magical arts in the Harry Potter series were pretty standard fare in training courses I mastered to some degree or another
The writer is referring to mastery of training courses, not of telepathy and time travel.
Don't laugh. You oughta read some of the Star Trek lists and message boards regarding Enterprise. "Why are humans always depicted as the ones with all the answers? Why are the aliens always mean, and humans always virtuous?"
Ack. At least we can say "where no man has gone before" again, instead of no one from Next Generation. But there are those who complain....
One of the best movies of 2001 in my opinion.
kangharue:
Yes..doesn't this Potter hysteria imply that this stuff is real?
I also agree with the poster who correctly pointed out that the God vs Satan dualistic theology of the anti-Potter people isn't Christian. It belongs to Zorastrianism, the pre-Islamic religion of Persia. The Christians rejected it as a heresy a long time ago.
There is a lot written about that subject already. Kids writing their own epitaphs, I don't think is a very good idea. However, the point of this thread is that some people see some danger in reading Harry Potter. I for one find the fascination with the little nerd somewhat amusing. I have had no interest in purchasing the books and my kids have not had an overwelming desire to read them or purchase them on their own. So now there is a movie out which I don't plan on going to see, because I don't care. My kids aren't all up in a wad wanting to go see it either.
I was at the store writing a check for an item I had bought and another saleslady asked my son in a simply gushing tone, "Don't you just LOVE Harry Potter?" You should've seen the look on his face. It was pricelss. He said, "No." First of all, he didn't know or care who Harry Potter was and secondly, he knows that it is improper to LOVE another boy who's not your dad or brother. The look on her face was priceless as well.
I am not a big Harry Potter fan but of course I have not been much into fantasy since I was in grade school.
This first Harry Potter installment doesn't seem to be as well done as the first Star Wars and they had over 20 years to improve on the formula.
The "Lord of the Rings" hits the theatres next month. It'll be interesting to compare the two.
But I've got it now. It's your birth date.
Personally I don't believe Harry Potter is the onlybook that discerning parents should keep away fromtheir kids, however due to all the publicity the books/film are getting at the momentit's natural that it should be discussed.
My objections to the book are as follows.
When magic and sorcery are represented in Harry Potter they are put forward in an entirely positive light with no suggestion that such things may be either dangerous or morally wrong.
The books have been carefully researched and not only do they represent paganism in a seductive manner but they also mirror the beliefs of pagans today so that any children who may develop a fixation with the occult has been well and truly pointed in the "right" direction.
Anyone who does research into what other books children who read Harry Potter are reading should not be surprised to find that theother books also have a strong occult flavour.
As someone who has known quite a few witches I can tell you there is a lot more to witchcraft today then tree hugging nature worship.
Some of the witches I have known have been into drug dealing, homosexuality and other sexual perversion and placing curses on people who they don't like or that have offended them.
The power they call upon is real and it is the power of fallen angels/demons.
Deuteronomy 18:9 When you enter the land the LORD your God is giving you, do not learn to imitate the detestable ways of the nations there. 10 Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, 11 or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.
1 Corinthians 10 20 No, but the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God, and I do not want you to be participants with demons.
1 Thessalonians 5 21 Test everything. Hold on to the good. 22 Avoid every kind of evil. 23 May God himself, the God of peace, sanctify you through and through. May your whole spirit, soul and body be kept blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The Lord Jesus was a child once. An obedient child and one who loved His fathers house.
I think we should ask ourselves this before we let children read these books; Would Jesus have read Harry Potter?
Would he think it was a good thing that practises and beliefs which were declared in the Holy Scripture to be hated in the eyes of the Lord should be presented as helpful and to be desired?
Would he think that it was harmless and "just fantasy"?
I don't think so
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.