Is This Gay Behavior Sick?

Too Good Reports ^ | November 21, 2001 | Henry Makow Ph.D.

[csistrueblue]

I think between the two of you - the pervert is pretty obvious - hmmmmm!

[f.Christian]

Evil people, Peck says, have “an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong…Their main weapon, interestingly enough is (REASON)the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to (try)confuse others.” (297)

[FormerLib]

And a bump to a great quote. Yes, many of the actions of the pro-homo cheerleaders make sense when you consider the possibility that they are "People of the Lie."

[Old Professer]

How about Is This Gay Behavior Sick?

[BikerNYC]

Afraid to answer, huh? Afraid to be seen as the self-proclaimed moralist to all that will listen? Some of us are beyond you and your trite answers to complicated questions, always with the attitude that you (yes you, lucky for us to be alive when you are here to pronounce your solutions) have solved profound questions that have been debated for thousands of years.

Do a self-search, buddy, and see how many times you have visited FR's "sodomy threads." What you will find will not surprise me.

To quote a very thoughtful author:

"You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

I perfect description of your own fanatical obsession with this issue.

[Saundra Duffy]

Support the Boy Scouts of America. For victory & freedom!!!

[dixierat22]

Huh? You compare a tv show to the real world? That makes no sense at all! The 'Sopranos' is MAKE-BELIEVE. Join the real world, it's more fun, anyway.

[FormerLib]

"When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

So, when people suggest that we must defend our Constitution against the intrusion of increased Federal power, it is your belief that they believe the goals and rights enshrined in the Constitution are wrong and not because there really is a threat?

I believe this piece of anti-Christian doggerel can be tossed on the heap with all the rest.

[FormerLib]

Obviously, we have a true believer in the "right-to-buggery" wars here. I don't think you should waste anymore time upon he/she/it.

[ArGee]

Just about every reputable psychologist in the world disagrees with the assumption that homosexuality is a perversion.

"Reputable" = submits to peer pressure about what a psychologist is supposed to believe.

One very reputable psychologist (I have forgotten his name) did some research on ex-homosexuals and concluded that they were indeed former homosexuals who were now completely heterosexual. He was surprised by the findings - he expected to find something else. So he asked the APA if he could have a forum to discuss his results. They denied him and he is now a non-"reputable" psychologist.

Sticking that word "reputable" in your statement showed your true colors, GW.

Shalom.

[M. Peach]

I think there is more to your equation than meets the eye - certain customs and traditions have taboos for practical reasons that are relevant still today -

Why do you think Jews and Muslims don't eat pork? Most likely because many became ill or died when they ate tainted or uncooked pork. It may not be relevant today, but it still exists.

On the other hand why was homosexuality taboo? Could it be because of the numerous diseases associated with anal intercourse?

Why is beastiality taboo? Because of syphillis and other diseases associated with it - Take pedophila or incest - Why are they taboo? Could it have to do with the resultant consequences of that type of activity?

In my opinion - and I'm not being judgmental here - The next taboos to fall are pedophillia and beastiality - We're already seeing that in some of the more "fashionable" advertising....

[ArGee]

You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.

I'm not sure this is on topic, and maybe I'm misunderstanding your point, but I am totally dedicated to Jesus Christ and I have complete confidence in Him. I would tell anyone who will listen that He is The Way, The Truth, and The Life and the only way to receive abundant life is through Him. On the other hand, I don't feel threatened when people disagree. If they don't want to believe me, that's their problem, unless they are a friend about whom I care very much.

Similarly, I would tell anyone that the sun comes up every morning. But if some idiot told me it didn't, I'd let him enjoy his fantasy world. Would it be my place to disabuse him?

Shalom.

[William Terrell]

You are very confused, my friend. The very foundation of material reality as applied to creatures is a testament that homosexuality is deviant and a perversion of normality. Historical and current observations are a testament that it is socially and personally destructive.

The only people who are able to tunnel their vision around these observable and unarguable truths are homosexuals and idiots. Homosexuality is and always has been, in every civilization on the planet past and present, uniformly denounced and that denunciation is part of the wisdom of the race along with the nature of women and men.

Homosexuality is simply mental sickness, an identity crisis. To think otherwise, socially, is equivilent to, individually, deciding you can fly and jumping off a cliff. The fall is the epitome of freedom itself, until the bottom arrives.

[Romulus]

Things "sacred" are too important to be limited by a concept of a deity.

Rubbish. You're proposing a definition so broad and slack that, at bottom, all it really means is "important, only in a deeply meaningful way that I nevertheless find impossible to express". This is high school romanticism -- and public high school at that. You might as well say that hunger's too important a concept to be limited to food, or wind too important to be circumscribed by an awareness of air.

The sense of sacredness cannot be severed from the concept of the divine without its meaning evaporating altogether. It can't be done.

Let me remind you that this discussion was started when you tossed off a wisecrack about the Church being anti-sex because it's fun. What makes you such an authority on what the Church teaches anyway? I ask only for information.

[eaglewatch]

Ref #111: If you replace the words "pro-homo cheerleaders" with the word "Jew," you will get my point about the Spotlight.

[eaglewatch]

Ref. 110: If your studied the Bible, you would understand that the "Sodomite sin" had nothing to do with homosexuals. It is the same sin that prevents the Afghan Muslims from turning over Bin Laden. READ - it is good for you!

[rightofrush]

Whereas I think that homposexual tendencies are a continum, a bit of gay-basing and harrassment might save those on the margin.

[eaglewatch]

Ref. #135: BIG BUMP on that one!

[Buffalo Bob]

Gotta agree with your first point Bob. But no way is queerism Satan's most proud achievement. That would be The SCUMBAG and The Hildebeaste.

You may have me there!