Replies

Afraid to answer, huh? Afraid to be seen as the self-proclaimed moralist to all that will listen? Some of us are beyond you and your trite answers to complicated questions, always with the attitude that you (yes you, lucky for us to be alive when you are here to pronounce your solutions) have solved profound questions that have been debated for thousands of years.

Do a self-search, buddy, and see how many times you have visited FR's "sodomy threads." What you will find will not surprise me.

To quote a very thoughtful author:

"You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

I perfect description of your own fanatical obsession with this issue.

"When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

So, when people suggest that we must defend our Constitution against the intrusion of increased Federal power, it is your belief that they believe the goals and rights enshrined in the Constitution are wrong and not because there really is a threat?

I believe this piece of anti-Christian doggerel can be tossed on the heap with all the rest.

Obviously, we have a true believer in the "right-to-buggery" wars here. I don't think you should waste anymore time upon he/she/it.

You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.

I'm not sure this is on topic, and maybe I'm misunderstanding your point, but I am totally dedicated to Jesus Christ and I have complete confidence in Him. I would tell anyone who will listen that He is The Way, The Truth, and The Life and the only way to receive abundant life is through Him. On the other hand, I don't feel threatened when people disagree. If they don't want to believe me, that's their problem, unless they are a friend about whom I care very much.

Similarly, I would tell anyone that the sun comes up every morning. But if some idiot told me it didn't, I'd let him enjoy his fantasy world. Would it be my place to disabuse him?

Shalom.

When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

From your post I have no idea what side of this issue you are taking, but this statement is wisdom.

Afraid to answer, huh? Afraid to be seen as the self-proclaimed moralist to all that will listen? Some of us are beyond you and your trite answers to complicated questions, always with the attitude that you (yes you, lucky for us to be alive when you are here to pronounce your solutions) have solved profound questions that have been debated for thousands of years.

Asked and answered, and I repeat, the answer is yes for the rest of the verbally challenged. Your foul and erroneous analogy is that it would be deviant, but what is complicated or profound about perversion, is it good or bad?

Do a self-search, buddy, and see how many times you have visited FR's "sodomy threads." What you will find will not surprise me.

Okaay… there good buddy, at least I’m not here to justify my brother’s filthy behavior, I’m here to expose the pseudo intellectuals like you who put the values of self over the good of society.

To quote a very thoughtful author: "You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

Listen philosophy boy, please point out my dogma, where ever did I bring religion into the argument? Your reading comprehension needs improvement. Oh and, please spare us the Zen analogies of metaphysics, they are capricious and irrelevant. Is perversion right or wrong?

Is it better for an idea (intellectualism) to destroy a society than for a society to destroy an idea? The scientific test of a vice is not that society approves or disapproves. The test should be is it rational or irrational. Is perversion rational?

I perfect description of your own fanatical obsession with this issue.

Exactly what have you perfected, or is it just that your fanaticism to justify your brother’s baseness and degradation that is peaking through the objective reality of truth?

BikerNYC: Quoting someone else..."You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

Where's the thread about the sun not rising tomorrow?

*rolls eyes*