Posted on 11/12/2001 1:42:41 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:02:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
November 12, 2001 --
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
I agree. And we need to do it using the same social tools we have used for years: ostracism, alienation, boycott. There is no need for violence of any kind. We can simply remove them from our social fabric. We don't need to embrace our enemies, nor do we need to cherish those who would destroy us. If they cannot live in peace, if they force us to choose between tolerance and domination, they had better be prepared to be dominated.
There is no question that the materialism of the West trumps the brutal, enforced "spirituality" of Islam. And the shepherds of that flock know that they're fighting a losing battle. How ya gonna keep 'em on the rug after they've tasted the sweet life? By threatening to behead them if they waver. By putting a match to the sweet life and declaring it Satan's playground. By murdering 5,000 unarmed office workers and then yammering about it like you've accomplished something great.
Muslims love to hoot about "jihad" and "holy war." But if they truly want a holy war, Muslim against non-Muslim, they'd better lay in a good supply of body bags, and put a night shift on the virgin line, 'cause they're gonna need 'em.
How do you know it's the "right" thing to do?
Doc
If there was ever an arguement against gun control, this is it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.