Absolute Proof Sydney Morning Herald Can NEVER Be Trusted - See How They Altered Recount Story!

Sydney Morning Herald ^ | October 22, 2001

[Timesink]

Now, the last few paragraph were probably just truncated for space reasons. But the reasons why the first two sets of paragraphs were deleted are blindingly obvious.

Let this be a lesson to us all: NEVER trust anything published by a newspaper that intentionally rewrites stories to ADD LIBERAL BIAS! Spread the word!

[MJY1288]

What re-count, and wasn't that election years ago?

[Dog]

The Fla Mess seems like a LIFETIME AGO!

[the_Watchman]

170,000 discarded ballots?

During recounts, discarded ballots are not included. Prior "recounts" dealt only with the issue of the chads and dimples. This sounds like it was a much wider set of ballots than was ever considered before. However, I suspect that they didn't bother to examine military ballots discarded due to problems with the postmarks.

[MJY1288]

And to be honest it is over, nothing can change things and I for one ...Thank God we dont have Gore in there, I can not imagine where we would be with that idiot running things

[mdittmar]

more than 170,000 votes rejected as unreadable

This says it all.

If you are to stupid to fill out a ballot properly don't vote.

This is my final comment on this subject,it's old news,if I see another post about it I won't waste my time responding.

[alnick]

Ack! It doesn't matter. Since when does the MEDIA decide what ballots to count and how to count them? The votes were counted according to the law in place at the time and President Bush won. The fact that a different number resulted from every single recount should tell those idiots something.

[Hiro Protaginast]

Am I just a total idiot and can't comprehend this? They've spent $2M and have not counted the ballots yet, and if they have not counted them, how do they know Gore won?

[dalebert]

Clinton was in Australia on 9-11. I am sure he was setting this up. I read that a bunch of key Dems are seething because the 9-11 attacks have prevented their attacs on President Bush.Guess they think if they can get another country to do it they can get the message out anyway.I am really sick of foreign press piling on. They seem to ignore the fact that military votes were disqualified at a rate of 5 to 1 compared to questionable votes in fl.

[TomGuy]

Year 2029--Headline--Recount nearing closure as Bush's lead is reduced in 2001 election. A final definitive recount should be completed within the next decade.

Subheadline--Democrats contend they will win before they cease recounting.

(/sarcasm)

[anymouse]

Sounds like the Aussies are due a rebellion to toss these liberal bastards out of the country.

[Jorge]

LOL! This is pathetic.

I was already shown that if the recount was conducted on Gore's terms, that Bush would have won by an even larger margin.

Bush won the count, the recount, re-recount, the re-re-recount under Gore rules that were later rejected by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional...and the media recount.

Now these losers invent brand new definitions of what a vote is, and count "votes" that have never been legal at anytime and want to tell us therefore Gore really won.
These liars will never stop fabricating more lies in order to avoid facing reality.
I hope they are making themselves miserable.

[Valin]

The Fla Mess seems like a LIFETIME AGO!

"We don't have time for this stuff anymore." Tony Snow

[boop]

Exactly! Are we supposed to believe that with democrats in full theft mode during the re-re-re counts that they somehow "missed" an additional 170,000 ballots? WHERE are these ballots from? I say call their bluff, if these leftist have the goods, RELEASE the information! Otherwise, I will believe the liberals are lying AGAIN! What about other states with "rejected" ballots? Memo to leftist media: If a ballot is rejected, it DOESN'T COUNT, whether it was for Bush OR Gore. It doesn't matter who you "feel" the voter "really wanted" to pick.

[Timesink]

late night bump

[newzjunkey]

Recount? If ever there was a story that wouldn't die--and a story were we *REALLY* do need to move on from this would be the one!

[newzjunkey]

Recount? If ever there was a story that wouldn't die--and a story were we *REALLY* do need to move on from this would be the one!

[newzjunkey]

After-hours Freeper BUMP!

[RedWing9]

And let's not forget that the claim that Gore won is predicated by the words of one source, David Podvin.

However David Podvin, an investigative journalist who runs an independent web page,BARF ALERT! Make Them Accountable

First of all, Mr. Podvin is merely a contributor to the site quoted, not the one who runs it. This is from their front page where a person named Caro makes that correction.

Second, this site is obviously a left-wing online gossip page dedicated to proving albore won the election.

Would have been nice if the story writer, either from the Telegraph or the Sydney Morning Herald, had checked the source for validity and bias.

But, I shouldn't expect much from a leftist media...

[Sgt_Schultze]

Thanks for the link.