To: taiwanese_superhawk
OUT THEY GO!!!
2 posted on
10/20/2001 12:28:24 PM PDT by
dandelion
To: taiwanese_superhawk; dandelion
3 posted on
10/20/2001 12:32:39 PM PDT by
Pericles
To: taiwanese_superhawk
A BBC investigation has revealed that the United Nations funded the work of a charity believed by the United States to be a front organisation for Osama Bin Laden. I'm not all that surprised over this. I'm actually more surprised thet the BBC would reveal it.
'UN duped'
Or, on second thought, I'm not.
4 posted on
10/20/2001 12:45:38 PM PDT by
Cachelot
To: taiwanese_superhawk
let's freeze their assets.
5 posted on
10/20/2001 12:48:03 PM PDT by
MrFred
To: taiwanese_superhawk
The most important work of the UN is to fund all enemies of America with US money anyway.
To: taiwanese_superhawk
It's interesting how the article jumps from "if the US allegation is true" and "if the US Treasury is right" to "The
fact that the UN has been so easily duped..."
In any case, the amount of money potentially involved is small -- $1.4 million spread among a consortum of charities, only one of which is alleged to have been involved. If this were any other organization but the UN -- and it probably could be any other major charitable organization, if subjected to such intense scrutiny -- would it even be worth reporting?
8 posted on
10/20/2001 1:24:22 PM PDT by
RonWebb
To: ratcat; ppaul; B4Ranch; backhoe; Libertina
The UN donated more than $1.4m to a consortium of charities working in the Sudan in 1997, one of which was the Muwafaq (Arabic: blessed relief) Foundation.
To: taiwanese_superhawk
13 posted on
10/20/2001 1:59:03 PM PDT by
ppaul
To: taiwanese_superhawk
Interestinger and interestinger tisint it.
To: taiwanese_superhawk
The UN frequently gives money to questionable characters; this is not the first time it's happened;
even the US federal government does similar things in that it gives money to left-wingers on college campuses.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson