Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq's chemists bought anthrax from America
London Telegraph ^ | Filed 10-18-01 | London Telegraph

Posted on 10/17/2001 10:02:23 PM PDT by Salvation

Iraq's chemists bought anthrax from America
(Filed: 18/10/2001)

Saddam's bio-warfare scientists were trained in Britain and sent off for bacteria by mail order, reports Roger Highfield

THE intelligence community has focused on Iraq as a possible source of the anthrax used in the bio-terrorist attacks in America.

If Iraq is the culprit, it is likely that Saddam Hussein would have used one of 21 strains of the anthrax bacterium which his scientists bought by mail order from America in the 1980s.

In a further irony, most of the leading scientists in the Iraqi bio-warfare programme, including its project chief, Rihab Rashida Taha, were trained in Britain.

In 1995, three years before the United Nations special commission weapons inspectors were forced to pull out of the country, Iraq admitted that it had produced 2,000 gallons of anthrax.

The UN destroyed most of those supplies, but officials believe that Baghdad hid four times as much as was discovered.

Iraq still has the best biological expertise in the region and experts agree that, since the UN inspectors left, Saddam has been back in the bio-warfare business.

Britain has played an unwitting role in arming Iraq, although a spokesman for the successor to Unscom - the UN monitoring, verification and inspection commission - said: "There is not an awful lot of difference between making vaccines and making bio-weapons - it is a bit unfair to mark those who supplied Iraq as guilty."

British companies exported to Iraq large quantities of the growth media in which biological weapons are cultivated and its leading scientists were trained here.

The covert biological weapons research programme was directed by Gen Amer Saadi, who obtained a masters degree in chemistry at Oxford, and Rihab Taha, who studied microbiology at the University of East Anglia, said Richard Spertzel, the UN's former chief biological inspector.

Overall supervision was conducted by Saddam Hussein's son-in-law, Hussein Kamel, the director of Iraq's Military-Industrial Corp, and Ahmed Murthada, a British-trained engineer.

The country's biological weapons programme is believed to have started in 1974 at Salman Pak in the al-Hazan Ibn al-Hathem Institute, where Dr Taha arrived in 1980.

Five years later, Salman Pak was taken over by the Technical Research Centre and, in 1987, Dr Taha moved her team into the new al-Hakem facility at Salman Pak, where construction of facilities for production of anthrax began, among other agents.

At the time of the Gulf war, Iraq later acknowledged the large-scale production of anthrax spores and to have filled 50 bombs and five missile warheads with anthrax.

However, even in its "full, final and complete declaration" regarding its BW programme, submitted in September 1997, Baghdad continued to present the UN weapons inspectors with a false picture.

Iraq approached Porton Down in Britain for the Ames strain of the anthrax bacterium, said Dr Spertzel. "That [request] was fortunately denied," he said.

Iraq obtained much of its anthrax supply from the American Type Culture Collection. Between 1985 and 1989, it obtained at least 21 strains of anthrax from ATCC and about 15 other class III pathogens, the bacteria that pose an extreme risk to human health.

One strain had a British military pedigree and three of the other strains were listed as coming from the American military's biological warfare programme.

This came as a shock, said Dr Spertzel, although he added that at that time the ATCC had a policy to supply laboratories with credible reputations. The anthrax strains were ordered by the University of Baghdad and then diverted to the bio-warfare effort.

Mohamed Atta, the September 11 hijacker, reportedly had encounters with an Iraqi operative in Prague as recently as April and there have been reports of meetings between Iraqi agents and associates of Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.

However, Dr Spertzel added that what took place in these encounters, and whether bio-warfare was discussed, was a matter of speculation.

30 September 2001: Saddam has germ warfare arsenal, says defecting physicist
12 October 1995: Iraq's weapons could wipe out world, says UN


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Osinski
This came as a shock, said Dr Spertzel, although he added that at that time the ATCC had a policy to supply laboratories with credible reputations. = the University of Baghdad

WTF????

Sounds like we are one screwed up country - the biologicals with which we are being threatened came from us. Something is very wrong with this picture. Sounds like we've been had..

Who in their right mind would consider the University of Baghdad a "credible" place to send Anthrax???? These people have definitely lost it. The inmates are running the asylum. You called it correctly.

21 posted on 10/18/2001 5:50:39 AM PDT by mom of 2 GOP kids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
"There is not an awful lot of difference between making vaccines and making bio-weapons - it is a bit unfair to mark those who supplied Iraq as guilty."

I dunno, I see a huge difference! It would be a real shame if "the gov. of Iraq" accidentally spilled some anthrax, proving to the world their possesion of same and their intent. Hard to call it vaccine when it kills thousands.

If Iraq is responsible for current and future biological attacks, I would feel that a small tactical nuke would be an appropriate and equivalent response. Nukes have the pleasant side effect of completely sterilizing the ground in a significant radius: the vaccine for Saddam's "vaccine."

22 posted on 10/18/2001 6:08:18 AM PDT by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; gcruse
But...But..Iraqi Ambassador in Moscow Doctor Moujir al-Douri said that "There is neither bacteriological nor any other weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and Washington knows it excellently."

No bacteriological weapons in Iraq - ambassador.

Hmmm...who to believe??? ;)

23 posted on 10/18/2001 6:15:01 AM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
We are still training them today, as we speak.
Couldn't send 'em home, that might hurt someones feelings.
24 posted on 10/18/2001 6:20:05 AM PDT by Octavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12; James Otis; habs4ever; SamAdams76; wimpycat; BRK; copycat; RobFromGa...
FYI bump from another thread:

Anthrax Strain in Daschle letter 'Very Refined'

25 posted on 10/18/2001 6:39:48 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
ATCC is a chemical laboratory once located in Rockville, Md. now resides in Virginia.
26 posted on 10/18/2001 6:57:58 AM PDT by pattycake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
ATCC is a chemical laboratory once located in Rockville, Md. now resides in Virginia.
27 posted on 10/18/2001 6:57:59 AM PDT by pattycake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
Britain has played an unwitting role in arming Iraq, although a spokesman for the successor to Unscom - the UN monitoring, verification and inspection commission - said: "There is not an awful lot of difference between making vaccines and making bio-weapons - it is a bit unfair to mark those who supplied Iraq as guilty."

Let's keep this in mind. Also, I must have missed the evidence to back these claims...all I saw was a simple declaritive sentence that the ITTC sold the stuff.

28 posted on 10/18/2001 9:02:04 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Salvation
Baghdad Next Bump!
30 posted on 10/18/2001 3:44:19 PM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson