Posted on 10/17/2001 10:43:41 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim
Dear Rush:
As you must be fully aware of by now, sir, I consider myself to be amongst your greatest fans (and, yes, some folks who say that are actually sincere and not Seminar Callers). So, when I hear you presenting the LoonyLeftist Cal-State Professor's rantings on CNN about RightWing Militiamen being responsible for the Anthrax Terror, I immediately realize you are "working an angle." Your response to the Cal-State Leftist was to in essence say that you believe Saddam Hussein is the Root Cause of All Evil and that Domestic Terrorism could not possibly be suspected in this heinous crime. BWAHAHAHAHA...you are far too wise to believe that and I see Right thru your feigned naivete!!!
However, for the purpose of this e-mail, I will play along just a bit. Sure, it is entirely possible that Saddam Hussein and his Agents of Hatred could be responsible for the Biological Terrorism; however, IMHO, the Anthrax mailings are far more likely to be the handiwork of the anti-American Leftists who make up the Enviro-Whacko Community, including the Effete Elite who comprise the Tenured Class within our American Universities!!!
"What'choo talkin' 'bout, Willis?!" you say in yer best incredulous voice!!
Yes, my Wise FRiend, I said the Leftists in the Environmental Movement have got to be the Number One Suspects in the ongoing Domestic Terrorism Movement...please allow me explain!! You have always said that Lib'rals are the most hilarious when they are outta Power because they go absolutely crazy and yet can do no damage to this Country. Well, THE LEFT IS MOST DEFINITELY OUT OF POWER and it's driving them to measures that would have been unthinkable just six weeks ago. How do you think the Left feels when they read about Dubyuh's 89%+ Approval Ratings?! Well, on the DemocRATic Underground website, they are going absolutely NUTS!! Dick Cheney is well-advised to be making himself scarce with these deranged LeftistLoonies on the loose...THEY HATE US WITH A PASSION that they could never muster for Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein!!!
"But, Mudboy, you RightWing FReeperNut, (nice composite FReeperPic, BTW)" you say, once again feigning incredulity, "why would the Leftist Enviro-Whackos be mass-mailing these Anthrax spores to Tom Daschle, Tom Brokaw, and the Vast, LeftWing Medyuh Whore'd?! Are not these folks in bed with the Socialist Enviro-Whackos?!"
My response is, obviously, that The Leftists--like your buddy, the CNN/Cal-State Professor--believe they can use their Socialist Comrades in the Vast, LeftWing Medyuh Whore'd to blame those of us on the Right who are standing up valiantly against the ever-expanding, Tyrannical Federal Leviathan!! But why would we on the Right be piling onto the Left when the Left's doing a fine job of discrediting themselves? Fact is, we wouldn't...as my Friend Angelwood (you met her a few months ago) so prophetically says, "No Tear Gas Necessary...We're Conservatives!!" We know we're Right...why would we forfeit the High Ground to terrorize a few pro-Rape (yes...Juanita Broaddrick) Leftists?! We wouldn't...and any rational American will come to the same conclusion.
In closing, my FRiend, I humbly offer you my page number--AGAIN...(804-225-XXXX)--if you'd like to discuss this further on your radio show. I spent 5-10 minutes speed-dialing your 1(800)282-2882, but to no avail...I'm sure you've got another number that the important RightWingers call to get on yer show!!
Utmost FReegards...Mudboy Slim, RightWing Patriot and FReeper
Aren't they, though...MUD
Inside my Mind...legally "Tissue Mass"...
It Knows yet Yearns...MY Mind shan't Waste!!
Inside my "hollow" heart...there's some extra room...
Sky-Seedin' fer Lightnin'...ain't waitin' fer you!!
But if you want to...I-eye-eye am needing you here!!
Help Restore...the Absence of Fear!!
Justice shall reign through (inhale-exhale)...
Shan't raze my home!! (inhale-exhale)
This Country's undaunted...bin Laden's MY 'HO!!!!
Mudboy calls to you...to ALL my FReepin' FRiends...
We must support George Dubyuh...must DESTROY THE LEFT!!!
Justice-Lustin'...and I am needing you here...
Allah's the Absence of Fear!!
Fer Justice Hunger...Left's Justlessness is Rilin' me...
And Slick knows he's no Nam Ranger...this is TYRANNY!!
New FRiends shan't ignore our tunes...Slick's our Darkest Day!!!
Truth Shall Triumph...we're the True Right...
We'll reinvent Screen Names...
For I am wanting you...and I am needing you here...
The Future's Clear...Restore the Absence of Fear!!
FReegards...MUD
We can make it even easier for folks to access the Vast, LeftWing Media Whore'd by...
putting "Dear Media" in the TO ADDRESS field, and have it routed to yourself in your address book for a file copy. Then paste the following list into the BCC ADDRESS field and each recipient will be unaware that you have blanketed them all. Please be polite--yet firm--in asking why there has been such inadequate coverage into the sleazy criminal behavior of the DNC's Chairman, Terry McAulliffe. And if you could, please consider referencing the Terry McAuliffe Thread #7, aka http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b7ab8345eb6.htm in your mass email, then check back into this thread and let us know what you said.
letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, conedit@ajc.com, letters@baltsun.com, letter@globe.com, news@globe.com, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, opinion@charlotte.com, letters@suntimes.com, news@cleveland.com, letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com, letters@denverpost.com, business@det-freepress.com, letter@detnews.com, viewpoints@chron.com, letters@latimes.com, HeraldEd@herald.com, politics@startribune.com, letters@newsday.com, letters@nytimes.com, Inquirer.Opinion@phillynews.com, DailyNews.Opinion@phillynews.com, letters@post-gazette.com, letters@uniontrib.com, chronletters@sfgate.com, letters@examiner.com, letters@sjmercury.com, editpage@seattle-pi.com, opinion@seatimes.com, editor@usatoday.com, letter.editor@edit.wsj.com, Letterstoed@washpost.com, wtnews@wt.infi.net, feedback@cnn.com, cnn.onair@cnn.com, crossfire@cnn.com, viewer@c-span.org, colmments@foxnews.com, hardball@cnbc.com, letters@msnbc.com, opinion@msnbc.com, TheNews@msnbc.com, dateline@news.nbc.com, nightly@news.nbc.com, today@news.nbc.com, MTP@nbc.com
Let's do the Big Guv'ment Media Sycophants research for them, folks, and then see if we don't see a few more stories about Terry McAuliffe's Corruption in the Press!!
=^D, my Lefty Disruptor FRiend...MUD
Next step is to email Rush about what we're doing!! He's a busy man, but does read all his email personally, so be compelling in yer call fer Justice to be done!!
Rush's email address is Rush@eibnet.com
And make sure to link the "Black" thread, which has a url of http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3ba766692a25.htm
He'll get the message and will hopefully spread the word to his 20 Million-plus listeners!! Justice Fer All...Or None!!
FReegards...MUD
BTW, my self-described liberal FRiend (that's you, Sam, and not this Sakic fella...he's just a big ol' meanie...LOL!!), HOW 'BOUT THEM SKINS, BAY-BEEEEEE?!!
=^D...heh heh henh....
Need help refuting: U.S. gave antrhax to Iraq to use on Iran, post #14 and
Need help refuting: U.S. gave antrhax to Iraq to use on Iran, post #23 and
Need help refuting: U.S. gave antrhax to Iraq to use on Iran, post #25
for extensive references on how the United States government, under the direction of G.H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan, and the United Kingdom loaded Saddam to the gills with this stuff. Gulf War Vets are suing the companies responsible.
So, you see, just as the UK's ruling party attempted to blame the hoof and mouth outbreak on enviro-whackos and PETA, and were soundly pounded back to the stone age by all who did a teensy bit of research and discovered that
(1)Macedonia, Albania, Yugoslavia, etc., all had massive outbreaks of H&M in the early-to-mid 1990s;
(2) all meat was banned from those countries by the EU; and
(3)the UN and NATO was trampling all over those fields with men and equipment, stirring up the germies, and then bringing them home, just a bit after that;
this same B.S. theory is once again pummelled back into the stone age with a teensy bit of research into the crimes against humanity of G.H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan.
.... bet ol' Mud's gonna think twice before asking my opinion again ...
Have an anthrax-free day!
Here is how the WTC/Pentagon crash bombing operation came...
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?0
id=149495&article=10401
"WE ARE APT TO SHUT OUR EYES AGAINST A PAINFUL TRUTH... FOR MY PART, I AM WILLING TO KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH; TO KNOW THE WORST; AND TO PROVIDE FOR IT."
---- Patrick Henry
FWIW, IMHO, Israel had nothing to do with WTC...MUD
Yes, but regarding another issue, is Tony "Doug Williams, Jr." Banks the "solution" at QB for the SURGING Washington Redskins...or should we sign TROY AIKMAN??????!!!!
FReegards...Lavar's Best Bud (perhaps that'smy claim to fame...Hmmmmm)
I humbly DISAGREE...MUD
Well, the actions that Lincoln and Davis took sure were different.
Wrong. It's the liberals that are picking on the poor and the week. Tobacco taxes, Alcohol taxes. These taxes hurt the poor most of all. Also when Clinton raped, sexually abused, and sexually harrassed the women around him, it was Republicans that tried to hold him accountable and protect those women and subordinates.. Democrats defended him.
Tobacco and alcohol taxes only hurt the people who buy tobacco and alcohol. Oh, and they also hurt the proprietors of alcohol by cutting sales of their deadly product. Both will kill you gradually, no matter how much money you make. If you're asking me to feel sorry for Phillip Morris, you won't get any sympathy here. And I have a hard time accepting Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky as some sort of "oppressed group", in the same breath as victims of discrimination and profiling. The only reason they ever aligned themselves with Lewinsky was to score political points against Clinton. And that's giving them the benefit of the doubt, BTW...I have friends who are convinced it's all a protracted case of penis envy, and I can't argue against them.
Wrong. The bible says if a man will not work, let him starve. 2Th 3:10 For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. Of course there should be help to the ones among us that are unable to work, but Democrats want to give the money of the workers to those who just lay around, get on drugs, etc. Just because a person is poor does not mean there should be charity.
If you'll read Leviticus 25:35-36 a bit further down, it will contradict everything you just said: (from the article) "If your brother becomes poor, you are responsible to help him; invite him to live with you as a guest in your home. Fear your God and let your brother live with you; and don't charge him interest on money you lend him. Remember -- no interest; and give him what he needs, at your cost: don't try to make a profit!"
Besides, this is an overly narrow view of what aid to the oppressed is. It's not just food for the hungry, although that is an important part to it. It's also welfare-to-work programs to give people job opportunities, programs to pay for childcare for single moms, and Medicare and Medicare supplements to give medical aid to these people. And this is aid for those who cannot work, not aid for those who simply will not work. I spoke of this difference in my last post -- one example of someone who finds a loophole in the system gets generalized to portray the entire system as full of lazy, drug addicted leeches, when this is absolutely not the case.
And very often the conservative Democrats or "DIXIECRATS" of the so-called "Bible Belt" sided with the Republican Party. Indeed, ever since the G.O.P. has become the outright champions of native born, English speaking, male, white, upper class privilege, most of those former Dixiecrats are switching their allegiance -- thank God! -- to the new and revised Republican Party.
So you think that's a good thing?? Do you realize that most of the people in this country are not "native born, English speaking, male, white, upper class privileged" people? That would make the GOP a party for the interests of a minority of people. The reason they have disproportionate influence in the media, election boards, and legislatures of the country is because of their money. I am "native born, English speaking, male, white, and upper class privileged," but I don't want this party to represent me. That attitude is directly against the principal of loving others more than you do yourself. And this "new and revised" Republican party was growing more and more conservative up until 9/11. This is part of the reason why Jim Jeffords and other "New England Republicans" defected from the party. For every Zell Miller you find among the Democrats, there is a John McCain and Olympia Snowe to counter them.
The G.O.P. is the champion of the producers, whether they produse $200 a week of $200,000 a week.
And the Democratic party is the champion of the producer and the consumer, because if you don't take care of the welfare of the consumer, there would be no producers.
An emphatic "No" is the way Cain (and many conservative Christians today) would like to answer the rhetorical question "Am I my brother's keeper?"
My brothers keeper? Sounds like communism. God didn't say we were our brother's keeper. Every able bodied, able minded person is responsible for themselves.
Yes, to the degree that they can help themselves. It's when they are unable to help themselves that God says we should aid our fellow man. Again, you seem convinced that every single person on the welfare line is there because they're just "lazy", and this is entirely wrong. And it's this kind of generalization that causes all welfare to be cut and hurts the people that really do need welfare.
But from beginning to end, the answer the Bible keeps giving to that question is: "If you want God's approval, you must indeed be your brother's, and your sister's, and even your neighbor's keeper !
Where does it say this?
One place is Leviticus 25:35-36. I referenced it above.
Here are other early admonitions of part of the bible the Jews call "the Law" : { Leviticus 25:35-36 } "If your brother becomes poor, you are responsible to help him; invite him to live with you as a guest in your home. Fear your God and let your brother live with you; and don't charge him interest on money you lend him. Remember -- no interest; and give him what he needs, at your cost: don't try to make a profit!
Liberal lying through omission. Read on in Leviticus and you'll see that in verse 40, it's a temporary relief until the brother has a chance to get back on his feet.
Actually, it says in verse 40 he is to work "until the Year of the Jubilee"(NIV) and then be released, not work "until he gets back on his feet". Regardless, temporary aid is the only intent of welfare! Find me one lawmaker who thinks people should be given any sort of aid if they don't plan to use it to better themselves. Too often, people make this assumption in order to keep from giving any aid at all to these people, and even to prevent giving non-monetary aid. Another case of sweeping generalizations and proof by stereotype by conservatives.
The appeal of this passage to charity is rather unusual for the Hebrew bible, because more often than not the great prophets of old expressed concern for the unfortunate on the grounds of JUSTICE. In sharp contrast to the hard-hearted attitudes of "Christian Conservatives", the Bible rarely blames the victims of poverty and the like for their plight. Rather, the great prophets of the Bible blame the powerful for those ills and expect the community as a whole to redress what they perceive as INJUSTICES. { Deuteronomy 24:14 } "Never oppress a poor hired man, whether a fellow Israelite or a foreigner living in your town. Pay him his wage each day before sunset, for since he is poor he needs it right away; otherwise he may cry out to the Lord against you and it would be counted as a sin against you."
You will notice this person has a job. Conservatives do not disagree that the poor should be paid for their work. This guy is an idiot.
You missed the point of the paragraph. The author says nothing about the poor being paid for their work; it is saying that the community should expect the powerful to address injustices, not expect the wronged to fend for themselves. You should read more carefully what you're so quick to criticize.
And after 11 years of Roosevelt's socialism, Americans were even worse clad, worse housed, and worse nourished. The economy was in worse shape in 1941 than when he began his programs.
I think you mean nine years -- he was inaugurated in 1933. As I said earlier in the thread, FDR was trying things that had never been tried before, out of the desperateness of the Great Depression (which, incidentally, was much worsened by the Republican administration of Hoover than by FDR). It took WWII, which began in 1941, to snap us out of it. The fact that many of his ideas are still around today attests to the worthiness of the programs.
As time went on in Biblical times, there arose once in a great while a preacher whose words were worth recording for future generations to hear. A few of these made predictions about the future, (mostly warnings, in effect, about the consequences of hearing or failing to hear God's teaching). But what made them great "seers" or "prophets" wasn't what they could predict about the future, but what they dared to see and say about the present, i.e. teaching that some people in high places did not want to hear, such as . . . { Micah 6: 8-12 } What does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God? The voice of the LORD cries to the city : . . . Can I forget the treasures of wickedness in the house of the wicked, and the accursed scant measure? Can I tolerate wicked scales and a bag of dishonest weights? Your wealthy are full of violence; your inhabitants speak lies, with tongues of deceit in their mouths. Your rich men are wealthy through extortion and violence; your citizens are so used to lying that their tongues can't tell the truth!"
Yep, some wealthy are like this. This sounds like a good description of Hollywood and Clinton and his pals. Rape is about as bad as it gets. Just because the rich in Hollywood are like this doesn't mean the whole country is. In this verse God was speaking to a specific group at a specific time.
Gee, and there's never been another evil rich white man in the whole world except for big bad Clinton and those Hollywood weirdoes. Anyway, you missed the point of the authors paragraph again. When God says "Your wealthy are full of violence..." and "Your rich men are wealthy through extortion and violence," that's addressed to the specific group. When God says " Can I forget the treasures of wickedness in the house of the wicked, and the accursed scant measure? Can I tolerate wicked scales and a bag of dishonest weights?", he's talking about everybody. See the difference?
"I never gave them hell. I just tell the truth, and they think it is hell." - Harry Truman
"If they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them." Adlai Stevenson, (who lost to Ike Eisenhower)
Oh boy, you don't actually want to bring up lying do you? Clinton set a record.
Sure, we can talk about lying. We can talk about the way Shrub lied about his role in Funeralgate, we can talk about the way he lied about when the troops in Kosovo would be sent back home, we can talk about lying about the effectiveness of the Missile Defense System, we can talk about lying about all kinds of stuff that actually has a bearing on the welfare of the country, unlike Clinton lying about a BJ. What he lied about didn't even have a bearing on the Whitewater hearings...it was just a tangent designed to entrap the president by our friends in the GOP.
{ Amos 8:4-7 } "Listen, you merchants who rob the poor, trampling on the needy; you who long for the Sabbath to end and the religious holydays to be over so you can get out and start cheating again -- using your weighted scales and under-sized measures; you who make slaves of the poor, buying them for their debt of a piece of silver or a pair of shoes, or selling them your moldy wheat." Those who cheat are wicked, this doesn't conflict with conservative views.
You missed the point again. Keep reading below to see what the author is actually talking about, rather than assuming you know already.
Once again, this kind of scripture doesn't make those who oppress or exploit others happy. But if you put yourself in the shoes of the men, women and children who are being oppressed, it should certainly make you happy to know that God doesn't approve of sneaky merchandisers who are constantly using dirty tricks to reduce the quantity and/or quality of their products and/or increasing the prices, and eliminating the opportunities customers have to buy such products at lower prices from competitors.
Dirty tricks such as the unrequested taking of wages from union workers and giving that money the the Democratic party.
What's your reference for this claim?
Clinton was king of the campaign contribution. He sold nuclear missile technology to the Chinese for campaign cash.
These have always been unsubstantiated claims. They have about as much substance right now as the claims that Cheney had his "town hall meetings" on energy policy only with those large corporations that made equally large contributions to the GOP.
(To be continued...)
Well, as my grandfather used to say, "Even a blind pig finds an acorn every now and then!" =) Tony Banks actually showed a little bit of talent out there. But I don't think Philly and NY are trembling in their boots just yet.
Troy Aikman wearing a Redskins uniform is kind of like seeing Pedro Martinez in a Yankees uniform -- it's just really, really wrong. Besides, Troy is just way too frail to be a starting QB. And he's a precision QB, so he needs a whole season or two before he really gets a good sense of timing with his receivers.
When I heard the crowd at the Redskins game was chanting for Sonny Jurgensen to come back, I had to laugh...
What's not to like?
Chev putting the hurt of the Dearborne crowd again while driving another nail into the manufacturer's crown title, at that?
It doesn't get any sweeter than that.
Gordon's GOT to keep-up the pressure & make those, "Yates' Powerhouses" come get it from 'em.
~Assuming the Yates' gas-guzzlin' hogs don't frag, first? {hehe-haha-hoho}
Li'l E did himself, Chev, & his old man proud.
Still; me & my bride miss Old Iron Head like there aren't words to describe.
Racin's not quite the same without #3 on the track & that's just the way it is.
They better be, 'cuz the FReedom Train's pullin' outta the Station, and once that locomotive gets to a'hummin', there ain't no sayin' how far we'll go!! As I explained previously, the Skins are destined for 10-6 this year, tying them with both the Eagles and the Giants. Based upon their 3-1 record against those two, the Skins will win the NFC East on the way to losing in the NFC Championship to an undisclosed opponent.
And you heard it here first...MUD
BTW...Washington Redskins, Super Bowl Champs (January, 2003)
Don't worry Gran'ma...it'll be alright...
And don't worry brothers, say your prayers and sleep tight!!
And it'll be fine, sweet wife of mine...MUD'll be just fine!
Lend your voices only to Songs of FReedom!!!
No longer bend Right's strength fer that which you wish to be FRee from...
Fill your lives with Truth and Bravery...
And ALL shall learn...FAR Right's not Monsters.
We've heard Left's anguish...
I've heard Left's hearts cry out!!
Right is tired, we are weary, but we aren't worn out!!!!
So set down your chains...'til only Faith remains...
Set down Left's chains!!!
And lend your voices only to Songs of FReedom...
No longer lend your Strength to that which you wish to be FRee from...
Fill your lives with Truth and Bravery...
And We Shall Build...a World of Honor!!
There are plenty of Sheeple who pray for peace...
But if praying were enough our dreams wouldda come to be.
Left's Programs Enslave and Numb!!
Yet, the Heavens will hush themselves to hear...
Our voices ring out clear...with Songs of FReedom...
Songs of FReedom!!
Come on, you Lurkin' FReepers...join in and let's play!!
There is a Good Army coming and we are Armed with Faith...
To live, we must give...Justice!!
And lend our voices only to Songs of FReedom!!
No longer lend our Strength to that which we wish to be FRee from...
Fill your lives with Truth and Bravery...and Right shall lead...
Lend our voices only to Songs of FReedom!!
No longer lend our strength to that which we wish to be FRee from...
Fill your lives with Truth and Bravery...
And Right Shall Prove That Right's[or Life's] Worth Honorin'!!
The possibilities ARE endless, my Jewel...MUD
Mind yer P's and Q's around that redhead of yers...she's a keeper!!
Dittoes on the #3 Car, BTW...MUD
BWAHAHAHAHA!!! There ain't 3-4 QBs who couldda withstood that hit from Arrington without major downtime!! And we can't all be Daunte Culpepper, Bret Favre, or who else?! Terry Bradshaw?!
Troy's fine...and he'll get his timing back in time for the Skins playoff run.
"These have always been unsubstantiated claims...."
Unsubstantiated, my arse, and you know it, LEFTY!! Clinton's goin' down...and where he's goin' he ain't never comin' back!!
Wake up and smell the coffee, dude, it smells a lot fresher than the Big Creep's Bum!!
Hey Ivan...I can habla ingles, too!! How 'bout a Dubyuh/Blair Graphic?! Got any?
LOL...MUD
"WE ARE APT TO SHUT OUR EYES AGAINST A PAINFUL TRUTH... FOR MY PART, I AM WILLING TO KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH; TO KNOW THE WORST; AND TO PROVIDE FOR IT." ---- Patrick Henry
We're to blame when we're the ones who loaded him to the gills with all sorts of nastiness, which, if you click on the links given in my posts on the other thread (link to that thread is above in post #205), you will see he used rather effectively, not only on the Iranians, but on his own people. The pictures are graphic.
Hmmm ... I wonder what our founding fathers would have thought of a fellow American if he supported the cause of the enemy for a profit ... Oh yeh ... they called him Benedict Arnold:
With cool calculation, he [Benedict Arnold] initiated correspondence with Sir Henry Clinton, the British commander, promising to deliver West Point and its 3,000 defenders for 2O,OOO sterling (about $1 million today)...
Hey Buddy, quit pretending yer so friggin' IGNORANT...you ain't that stooopid and I don't appreciate you coming on my threads and actin' like you are!!
Capiche?!...MUD
One thing's for sure--this isn't Bin Laden's work. It's too amateurish. If Bin Laden were to use anthrax, he'd attack livestock with it. It's much more contagious to livestock than humans. He could wipe out entire herds with one fell swoop.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.