To: wcdukenfield
Has everyone forgotten how Bill and Hillary rewarded terrorists by releasing the Puerto Rican Terrorists from Federal Prison....
Why isn't the press now going after Hillary for her soft approach.....How about her kissing up to Hamas???
NeverGore
2 posted on
10/04/2001 6:21:58 AM PDT by
nevergore
To: wcdukenfield
We should be thankful for the Wall Street Journal, which is the ONLY media source with national distribution that ever publishes any genuine criticism of clinton. The New York Post also has a good record, but it is read mainly by New Yorkers and by people who visit internet sites like FreeRepublic.
Although there's nothing new in this story, it will probably be the first time a lot of people have seen it.
3 posted on
10/04/2001 6:25:34 AM PDT by
Cicero
To: wcdukenfield
This is great. The great Rushboe knows 'Humint'. As soon as he gets comfortable with 'Hazmat' he can begin calling himself an expert (in humint and hazmat) and start touring the cable talk shows.
To: wcdukenfield
Now that is from the Rush Limbaugh I started listening to years ago. [I don't know who that imposter is who lately has been taking his place behind the EIB microphone... You know the guy. The one who talks about golf, cigars and repeats himself for 45 minutes without giving us any information we don't already know.]
To: wcdukenfield
To be scrupulously fair, responding to the terrorist threat wasn't high on the Republican agenda pre-9/11. We were smug and complacent, and willing, apparently, to let our leaders pass over the first WTC bombing, the Cole, our embassies in Africa, et cetera et cetera. Isn't it obvious now that things were building up? But if you look back at the campaigning, neither Gore nor W spent a lot of time talking about this, now Bush's number one issue.
To: wcdukenfield
Bill and Hillary are a couple of pathological psychopaths who never should have been put in office. Remember,Bill's first love is his penis and its needs,and secondly he is a coward and a draftdodger.. Beyond that he allowed the sale or theft of Missle technology to enemies of the U.S.A. After that, is his LEGACY of weakening the U.S.A. and through his FECKLESS terms in office, presented the U.S.A. as a Nation of self serving Bullies. He is a disgusting example of a man.. We are reaping the Whirlwind of his actions.. Don't ever forget the people who supported him are still in office in the DemocRAT party.. Gephardt,Bonior, Conyers,Daschle, and the everpresent Jesse Jackson..
8 posted on
10/04/2001 6:39:26 AM PDT by
chatham
Bill Clinton had eight years to do something--but was totally ineffective. Al Gore, while VP, was in charge of improving security for the airlines--but did nothing, or at most, not enough. Congress was asleep at the switch, too, perhaps because of Bubba's un-presidential behavior.
To: wcdukenfield
"There comes a time in the affairs of men when one must grab the bull by the tail and face the situation." --William Claude Dukenfield
It seems to me, that the estimable Mr. Limbaugh has done just that.
11 posted on
10/04/2001 7:18:24 AM PDT by
Yankee
To: wcdukenfield
While I'm certainly no fan of the Clintons I don't think it's fair or right to point the finger of blame at them for terrorism.
Could Clinton have done more as President to fight terrorism? Probably. Is Clinton a low life scumbag? Definately. Is he responsible for terrorism? No!
There are a lot of people in America who've dropped the ball on fighting terrorists over the past several decades, including Congress, former Presidents, the CIA... the list goes on. Are any of them responsible for what happend on 9/11? Absolutely not.
It may be fun and satifying to blame Clinton for all of our problems, but let's not forget who the enemy is.
To: wcdukenfield YOU GO RUSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am glad that Rush was moved enough , by the astoundingly obvious avoidance of the mainstream media, to write this editorial. So glad. Rush knows and so do many of us, that it is past time to take a hard and HONEST look at that games and stupidity and cowardice of the clinton administration's dealings with terrorists who regularly crumpled American citizens.
Too bad Rush did not MENTION how the clinton administration did NOT BACK the nuclear inspectors who were brave enough to go to Iraq (as part of the end of the war agreement) and FINALLY simply allowed the inspections to STOP (we took our orders from Saddam at the time, with the UN acting like wet noodles, and our own President, billy the boinker, hiding somewhere-avoiding taking a demanding stance that Saddam allow continued inspections. Saddam COWARED Clinton.
Of course the terrorists saw and see Americans as weak, the clintons and their phil donohue agenda tore our spirit up and spit it out. Folks like the clintons will NEVER understand that:
FREEDOM DOES NOT COME FREELY.
Clinton did not start terrorism, of course, but he ENABLED IT just like his sick wife enabled him-year after year.
17 posted on
10/04/2001 8:25:06 AM PDT by
Republic
To: wcdukenfield
Bill Clinton Talks on Terrorism By Jennifer Loven Associated Press Writer Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2001; 10:51 p.m. EDT WASHINGTON -- Former President Clinton on Tuesday cited at least 15 terrorist attacks thwarted during his administration and said the keys to preventing others are supporting President Bush's current efforts and doing "more to reduce the pool of potential terrorists." "Though neither I nor anyone can tell you there will not be another terrorist attack on U.S. soil, it will be all right," Clinton told a packed Kennedy Center concert hall. "They still can't win unless we give them permission. We are not about to give them permission."... © Copyright 2001 The Associated Press COMPLETE ARTICLE |
compulsive clinton CYA-ing Because the frequency and intensity of compulsive CYA maneuvers by clinton and his/her gang are increasing in direct proportion to the increasing frequency and intensity of editorial comment fingering clinton for 9-11, I suspect compulsive clinton CYA-ing will soon reach critical mass. At that historic, civilization-sparing moment, Sandy Berger (along with his smarmy revisionism) will implode by virtue of one-too-many pressure-deflating "uhs"...taking the two inept, corrupt, cowardly, self-serving Boss-Dweeb dullards down with him. As Martha Stewart might say, this is a good thing...surprisingly, for the atavistic clintons as well as for advanced civilization.
- clinton CYA-ing clearly does precious little to cover the collective clinton posterior -- (or anterior, for that matter -- if we contemplate the profound private clinton -- er -- defects).
- clearly, clinton CYA-ing is compromising Bush's brilliant anti-terror campaign. (Perhaps compromising Bush is precisely what clinton has in mind, eh?...You might recall that clinton has a history of trashing other presidents in an effort to hoist his own sorry, putrified heft to marginally acceptable level.)
- Ironically, this latest clintonoid tactic has only served to congeal the already-established clinton legacy of egomania, depravity and failure. You might say that the clintons have served up their legacy poached, cold and coated with assss...pic.
![](http://members.aol.com/paperchs1/image_100.gif)
-
|
19 posted on
10/10/2001 3:27:45 PM PDT by
Mia T
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson