Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Married Episcopal priest will become priest in Roman Catholic Diocese of Scanton
virtueonline ^ | Jan 4 04 | David Virtue

Posted on 01/04/2005 2:34:33 PM PST by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-267 next last
To: Graymatter

Fr Richard John Neuhaus, a noted conservative Roman Catholic priest, was accepted into the priesthood after having a distinguished career in the Lutheran Church, and yes he has been married for many years. Like this Episcopalian, he left the ELCA as a matter of conscience, and responded to what he discerned to be a call.

I guess the RC Church has been getting complicated for some time while you weren't looking.


61 posted on 01/04/2005 8:16:22 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

To: wideawake
And 99% of the advocates of a married priesthood draw zero distinction between an unmarried ordinand and a married ordinand, as if a married man becoming a priest and a priest becoming a married man are equivalent situations, when historically no apostolic branch of Christianity has ever accepted the latter.

Very true. Even the Orthodox require that unmarried priests remain celibate after ordination. That is certainly a constant tradition.

But, let's face facts. The vast majority of young men eventually seek out marriage. Realizing that he would have to marry before seeking out ordination, perhaps a young man would seek a level of maturity before making the decision to marry or remain celibate. Of the 22 seminarians for our diocese, 15 are over 30. If all of these guys are ordained, few will leave.

I'd be in favor of making 30 the minimum age for ordination, or even 35, if the Church is going to continue to insist on mandatory celibacy.

63 posted on 01/04/2005 8:19:10 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: conservlib
The orthodox priests get married

Orthodox priests never get married. Many married Orthodox men eventually receive ordination, but no one ever gets married after they have become an Orthodox priest.

and they perform a good service to their parishioners.

They have their own problems too. People are always watching to see how much of the congregation's donations the priest's wife is spending on her wardrobe and household, how the priest's kids are behaving, etc. They have their own scandals as well, even married priests, in the same ways as celibate ones.

The orthodox church did not deviate from the teaching of Jesus one inch,

That's an arguable point. Christ had some significant things to say about Peter, for example.

and it has more deeply religious followers than the Catholic church has now.

That is either an ignorant or malicious statement, and unworthy of any serious person.

Hence, celibacy did not do the Roman Catholic church any favor.

For one thing, it greatly enhanced the effectiveness of the Church's mission activity, which may be one reason why five times as many people today call themselves Catholic instead of Orthodox. It may also be a factor as to why no Catholic prelate ever betrayed his entire country's church to the Communists in exchange for a pension.

64 posted on 01/04/2005 8:22:27 PM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
The only vocation in the Catholic Church that is growing is the one that accepts mature married men as candidates.

I didn't make myself clear. I was referring to the permanent diaconate. Granted, it's not exactly like the priesthood, but its growth gives ample evidence that there is no shortage of Catholic men who are willing to serve the Church.

There is, however, a shortage of men who are willing to commit to celibacy as a prerequisite for service.

65 posted on 01/04/2005 8:22:32 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

You are correct 100%


66 posted on 01/04/2005 8:23:05 PM PST by conservlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I'd be in favor of making 30 the minimum age for ordination, or even 35, if the Church is going to continue to insist on mandatory celibacy.

Given modern life expectancies, that's not an unreasonable proposal.

67 posted on 01/04/2005 8:23:52 PM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Celibacy is an unnatural state. "It is not good for man to be alone"...God, The Bible

Man, you nailed it good.

68 posted on 01/04/2005 8:24:29 PM PST by conservlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Fr Richard John Neuhaus, a noted conservative Roman Catholic priest, was accepted into the priesthood after having a distinguished career in the Lutheran Church, and yes he has been married for many years.

Neuhaus has never been married. I suspect that's the ONLY reason he was accepted into the priesthood, as he was a Lutheran.

69 posted on 01/04/2005 8:24:34 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

You are correct. I agree 100%.


70 posted on 01/04/2005 8:26:16 PM PST by conservlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: conservlib
You failed to notice that the qualification for the priesthood IS a GUY, who is not interested in GIRLS. By definition, that guy will be most likely a FAG!

With each succeeding post you make progressively sillier and more ignorant comments.

The classic qualification for the priesthood is a man who, while attracted to women, is willing to forgo the pleasures of married life in order to dedicate himself entirely to the service of God.

Would you contend that every Orthodox monk or bishop is a homosexual, because every Orthodox monk or bishop is unmarried?

Apparently you think that it is impossible for a man to resist temptation. Christ didn't think so.

71 posted on 01/04/2005 8:30:58 PM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
"It is not good for man to be alone"...God, The Bible

Then I guess you think that St. Paul was just an unnatural God-hater. And Jesus too, apparently.

72 posted on 01/04/2005 8:33:02 PM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
There is, however, a shortage of men who are willing to commit to celibacy as a prerequisite for service.

I know several men who are willing to make that commitment, but have been blackballed from the seminaries because the required psychological profile they had marked them as "rigid" or "intolerant" etc. in their attitudes and therefore unfit for pastoral service.

A strictly orthodox Catholic has to be a very deft conversationalist to get into most seminaries nowadays.

73 posted on 01/04/2005 8:37:47 PM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Oh stop it. There wouldn't be such a shortage of candidates for the priesthood if the faith was being properly taught at the parish level. The problem is that at the average Liberal Novus Ordo parish the faith is not being transmitted at all. Until this situation is changed, there will continue to be a shortage of men willing to enter into the average Diocesan seminary.


74 posted on 01/04/2005 8:54:17 PM PST by csbyrnes84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Were sought out by their parishioners?

Could those parishioners been of the female variety, those who perphaps sought out preachers, not for spiritual purposes but to seek a potential husband. Woe to these women who prey upon the clergy. !

75 posted on 01/04/2005 8:54:45 PM PST by ejo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
A tremendous loss of talent for the Church, all due to the absurd requirement that 24 year old men commit to never being near a woman again.

Don't be silly, sinkspur! They can be near them, they just can't have sex with them! ;o) Men have female friends all the time, without having the desire to bed them! Besides, most men I've known recently who have become priests are making that decision in their thirties! They certainly are not dewey eyed young men in the throes of some holy vision locking themselves into a life they don't understand. They've made the decision that serving God in the capacity of the priesthood is more important to them than marrying and having children.

76 posted on 01/04/2005 9:07:45 PM PST by SuziQ (It's the most wonderful time of the year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
As men age, testosterone becomes less of a factor in their decisions.

It's good that older men are being ordained today, but that still limits the priesthood to celibates.

My reference was a bit over the top, but I happen to believe that the vast majority of 24 year old men are too immature to commit to celibacy, and the attrition rate of men who are ordained at that age proves my contention.

77 posted on 01/04/2005 9:12:16 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
My reference was a bit over the top, but I happen to believe that the vast majority of 24 year old men are too immature to commit to celibacy, and the attrition rate of men who are ordained at that age proves my contention.

If you'll notice, most seminaries are not ordaining men in their early and mid twenties anymore. Most of them are nearer 30.

I believe the 80's and early 90's saw a lot of men leaving the priesthood because they were sold a lie at the Seminary. They were given to understand that they didn't have to worry about the rule of celibacy because it was going to be changed. The young men WANTED to believe that, so they went ahead and were ordained. When it became clear 5 or 10 years down the road that they'd been lied to, they realized that the priesthood wasn't for them after all. In my opinion, their ordinations were not 'regular' as a marriage wouldn't be 'regular' if one of the parties was deliberately lied to about a vital area of the relationship in order to get them into the marriage.

This is exactly what happened to a young priest in our Parish after we arrived here. Sir SuziQ's brother is a priest in the South, and he was visiting here. We had the Associate over for dinner and the discussion turned to priest formation. George mentioned that as far back as when HE was in the Seminary, in the mid 60's, there were liberals trying to push the envelope and were saying that time was running out for such an antiquated idea as celibacy, and that the men becoming priests now would not have to be worried about being stuck with that all their lives. I saw a look come across the young priest's face that told me he was told the same thing, and only then was he realizing that he was lied to. He left the priesthood within two years, and last I heard, was married.

I believe that Seminaries these days are being more realistic with candidates for the priesthood, and are stressing the teachings of the Church as they are, not as the folks running the Seminary might wish them to be.

78 posted on 01/04/2005 9:51:56 PM PST by SuziQ (It's the most wonderful time of the year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
I believe that Seminaries these days are being more realistic with candidates for the priesthood, and are stressing the teachings of the Church as they are, not as the folks running the Seminary might wish them to be.

Oh, that's true, for sure. My best friend in the seminary is now the Vice-Rector at the seminary I attended in Dallas. He says that they teach the upsides, and downsides, of celibacy, which is more than he and I got back in the early 70s.

But, even he admits that the caliber of men at Holy Trinity is nowhere near the guys who were in seminary with us. They were smarter, worked harder, and were just psychologically more balanced.

Many of us tried the seminary because we thought God was calling us. It turns out that He was calling me to marriage, but also to ministry, though the permanent diaconate wasn't even in existence then.

You and I will not agree on this, likely, but I believe that mandatory celibacy is depriving the Church of some fantastic men who would be outstanding and dedicated priests.

Let him accept it who can, the words of our Lord, should be the guiding principle here.

79 posted on 01/04/2005 10:01:14 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Gerard.P

Ping


80 posted on 01/04/2005 10:02:54 PM PST by murphE ("I ain't no physicist, but I know what matters." - Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson