Skip to comments.
Pics of F/A-37 Talon (Beautiful carrier based stealth)
globalsecurity.org ^
| 7/26/04
Posted on 07/26/2004 7:08:07 AM PDT by finnman69
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: fa37; hollywood; military; urbanlegend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-224 next last
Wow, variable geometry wing. Notice the pilot is a woman.
1
posted on
07/26/2004 7:08:10 AM PDT
by
finnman69
To: finnman69
2
posted on
07/26/2004 7:09:31 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: All
unfortunately its not real...
F/A-37 Talon
F/A-37 Talon Pictures
Links
Hollywood Joins Abe Underway to Film 'Stealth' Release Date: 6/23/2004 1:57:00 PM By Journalist Seaman Michael Cook, USS Abraham Lincoln Public Affairs
"Stealth"
"Stealth"
This airplane has been making the rounds for several weeks now, with folks being a bit confused as to whether it is the real deal.
On 18 June 2004 a scene for the upcoming Columbia Tri-Star movie "Stealth" was filmed on the flight deck aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72). Lincoln was conducting local operations in preparation for an upcoming scheduled deployment after 10 months of dry docked Planned Incremental Availability (PIA). About 80 cast and crew members were aboard the Everett-based aircraft carrier to shoot scenes for the Columbia Pictures action film starring Josh Lucas, Jessica Biel and Sam Shepard, The $130 million film is expected to hit theaters in 2005.
According to the back story, the F/A-37 "Talon" is a Mach 3.5, super cruise stealth fighter/bomber/interceptor with a 4000nm range. Top speed is somewhere in the Mach 4+ range. The movie is premised on an artificial-intelligence program designed to fly jet aircraft and reduce human casualties. Not surprisingly, one of the AI robo-pilots runs amok when Navy officials decide to use an unmanned version of the Talon. When the plane begins attacking friendly forces, Navy pilots are called in to save the planet from artificial intelligence.
3
posted on
07/26/2004 7:09:37 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: finnman69
welcome to the first images of Star Wars
4
posted on
07/26/2004 7:10:02 AM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Democrats: enemies of America)
To: finnman69
I'll take one of each.... Yowza, that pilot's a babe!
5
posted on
07/26/2004 7:12:02 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: finnman69
so it's "2001:a space oddessy meets the navy"?
6
posted on
07/26/2004 7:12:59 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: finnman69
it's also chained to the deck ...
To: The Wizard
More like Terminator (Hunter Killers).
8
posted on
07/26/2004 7:14:18 AM PDT
by
xrp
To: r9etb
Imagine a pictorial with her on a carrier....
9
posted on
07/26/2004 7:15:55 AM PDT
by
kaiser80
To: finnman69
To: finnman69
I noticed the pilot doesn't have a handle. Don't the other pilots like her or something?
To: Southern62
Does Michael Boore know about this?
12
posted on
07/26/2004 7:16:50 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: finnman69
DAMN! I had just sent the pics out as a jab to liberals about conservatives showing true non-discrimination.
Now I just had to send out the APOLOGY for FAKE pictures! To the newspapers also!
13
posted on
07/26/2004 7:17:33 AM PDT
by
steplock
( www.spadata.com)
To: finnman69
14
posted on
07/26/2004 7:17:37 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
To: finnman69
I doubt it's real. The Navy has no female pilots capable of flying (and landing) such an aircraft off a carrier. The women fixed-wing aircraft pilots on carriers have been a disaster.
15
posted on
07/26/2004 7:18:26 AM PDT
by
BadAndy
(Specializing in unnecessarily harsh comments.)
To: finnman69
16
posted on
07/26/2004 7:18:47 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: GATOR NAVY
I know it's fake. The tailmount is wrong.
17
posted on
07/26/2004 7:19:23 AM PDT
by
BobS
To: GATOR NAVY
Remember the terrible fake in that Clint Eastwood movie. Firefox? The effects were terrible.
18
posted on
07/26/2004 7:19:35 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
To: finnman69
Mmmmmm. Jessica Biel.
To: finnman69
A 4000 nm range? Let's see, that's 4 * 10-9 meters, or about 1.37 * 10-7 inches. But, hey! It can cover the distance at about Mach 4. So, these pictures probably show an entire flight, since the exposure time was probably a lot longer that it would take the plane to cover the distance.
20
posted on
07/26/2004 7:21:38 AM PDT
by
RonF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-224 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson