Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pics of F/A-37 Talon (Beautiful carrier based stealth)
globalsecurity.org ^ | 7/26/04

Posted on 07/26/2004 7:08:07 AM PDT by finnman69








TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: fa37; hollywood; military; urbanlegend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last
Wow, variable geometry wing. Notice the pilot is a woman.
1 posted on 07/26/2004 7:08:10 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: finnman69

and a cute on at that!


2 posted on 07/26/2004 7:09:31 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

unfortunately its not real...

F/A-37 Talon
F/A-37 Talon Pictures
Links
Hollywood Joins Abe Underway to Film 'Stealth' Release Date: 6/23/2004 1:57:00 PM By Journalist Seaman Michael Cook, USS Abraham Lincoln Public Affairs
"Stealth"
"Stealth"








This airplane has been making the rounds for several weeks now, with folks being a bit confused as to whether it is the real deal.

On 18 June 2004 a scene for the upcoming Columbia Tri-Star movie "Stealth" was filmed on the flight deck aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72). Lincoln was conducting local operations in preparation for an upcoming scheduled deployment after 10 months of dry docked Planned Incremental Availability (PIA). About 80 cast and crew members were aboard the Everett-based aircraft carrier to shoot scenes for the Columbia Pictures action film starring Josh Lucas, Jessica Biel and Sam Shepard, The $130 million film is expected to hit theaters in 2005.

According to the back story, the F/A-37 "Talon" is a Mach 3.5, super cruise stealth fighter/bomber/interceptor with a 4000nm range. Top speed is somewhere in the Mach 4+ range. The movie is premised on an artificial-intelligence program designed to fly jet aircraft and reduce human casualties. Not surprisingly, one of the AI robo-pilots runs amok when Navy officials decide to use an unmanned version of the “Talon”. When the plane begins attacking friendly forces, Navy pilots are called in to save the planet from artificial intelligence.


3 posted on 07/26/2004 7:09:37 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

welcome to the first images of Star Wars


4 posted on 07/26/2004 7:10:02 AM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I'll take one of each.... Yowza, that pilot's a babe!

5 posted on 07/26/2004 7:12:02 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

so it's "2001:a space oddessy meets the navy"?


6 posted on 07/26/2004 7:12:59 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

it's also chained to the deck ...


7 posted on 07/26/2004 7:13:18 AM PDT by Southern62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

More like Terminator (Hunter Killers).


8 posted on 07/26/2004 7:14:18 AM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Imagine a pictorial with her on a carrier....


9 posted on 07/26/2004 7:15:55 AM PDT by kaiser80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

It isn`t real.

``We would like to build a collection of other fake airplanes that have appeared in movies or on TV. If you can help us build this collection, please contact us with the information.``

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/fa-37.htm



10 posted on 07/26/2004 7:16:03 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I noticed the pilot doesn't have a handle. Don't the other pilots like her or something?


11 posted on 07/26/2004 7:16:44 AM PDT by IncredibleHulk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southern62

Does Michael Boore know about this?


12 posted on 07/26/2004 7:16:50 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

DAMN! I had just sent the pics out as a jab to liberals about conservatives showing true non-discrimination.

Now I just had to send out the APOLOGY for FAKE pictures! To the newspapers also!


13 posted on 07/26/2004 7:17:33 AM PDT by steplock ( www.spadata.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Fake


14 posted on 07/26/2004 7:17:37 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I doubt it's real. The Navy has no female pilots capable of flying (and landing) such an aircraft off a carrier. The women fixed-wing aircraft pilots on carriers have been a disaster.


15 posted on 07/26/2004 7:18:26 AM PDT by BadAndy (Specializing in unnecessarily harsh comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Man! That's AWESOME!!!


16 posted on 07/26/2004 7:18:47 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

I know it's fake. The tailmount is wrong.


17 posted on 07/26/2004 7:19:23 AM PDT by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

Remember the terrible fake in that Clint Eastwood movie. Firefox? The effects were terrible.


18 posted on 07/26/2004 7:19:35 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (They are where you least expect. Look around and you'll see them too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: finnman69


Mmmmmm. Jessica Biel.
19 posted on 07/26/2004 7:20:11 AM PDT by wmichgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
A 4000 nm range? Let's see, that's 4 * 10-9 meters, or about 1.37 * 10-7 inches. But, hey! It can cover the distance at about Mach 4. So, these pictures probably show an entire flight, since the exposure time was probably a lot longer that it would take the plane to cover the distance.
20 posted on 07/26/2004 7:21:38 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson