Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shoes come second in smokers' homes
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | June 11. 2004 | Adele Horin

Posted on 06/10/2004 6:43:49 PM PDT by sarcasm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Wolfie
Hmmm...quite a bit like those in the U.S. who think people on assistance shouldn't be able to buy junk food with thier food stamps.

That's because "food stamps" is an agriculture subsidy. Food stamps are issued by the Dept of Agriculture, not the welfare dept.

81 posted on 06/11/2004 7:58:44 AM PDT by lewislynn (I can say I have an ugly sister. But don't YOU ever tell me my sister's ugly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

You really expect an answer?

Smokers are all leaches on society and contribute nothing, according to some.

Gotta go have some coffee and a cig and think about my uselesness!




82 posted on 06/11/2004 8:08:53 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Its the same concept. Blowing public money on non-essential items. How does it go? If you're taking gov't $$$s, then don't bitch when the gov't calls the tune.


83 posted on 06/11/2004 8:12:50 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
"If a smoker can get by with less money, then we should cut their welfare checks by the same amount they spend on tobacco. "

I hate to say it, but you and I both know that is NOT going to happen. Those who receive "welfare" are going to get it, no matter WHAT they spend it on...it will only increase over time.

Besides, this original story was in the "Sydney Morning Herald", from Australia...so the difference in dollar amounts and cost of cigarettes may skew the figures shown...
84 posted on 06/11/2004 8:39:30 AM PDT by FrankR (A fanatic is one who won't change his mind, and can't change the subject...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
And what about those of us spending our own money.............why should we be forced to "rebate" to the state?

If you can afford the luxury, why not ? It lowers my tax burden and that is a good thing and it doesn't make anyone else pay more than they choose to. This is no different than lotto.

85 posted on 06/11/2004 10:09:01 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion

Your advocacy of higher taxes is disgusting.


86 posted on 06/11/2004 1:35:46 PM PDT by Gabz (RIP President Ronald W. Reagan 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion; Gabz
How I pine for the good old days when the "just leave me alone" contingent of the citizenry was still the majority.

Now it's come down to an ever growing group of hand wringing "men" aspiring to womanhood, and women who equate femininity with whining.

Somewhere along the way, these two groups confused toughness with meanness and petty complaining, and none of us are better off for it.

87 posted on 06/11/2004 5:58:42 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
How I pine for the good old days when the "just leave me alone" contingent of the citizenry was still the majority.

You and me both.

88 posted on 06/11/2004 6:08:35 PM PDT by Gabz (RIP President Ronald W. Reagan 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

You my friend are the exception, not the rule.


89 posted on 06/13/2004 7:37:27 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

Bravo for you sir. It sounds like you are a responsible individual. I realize I was painting with broad strokes. I just grow frustrated with those who take the other route.


90 posted on 06/13/2004 7:39:36 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: metesky

many times, the choice to smoke is but one in a long line of unwise choices. While it may not be true in every case, it is most certainly true much of the time.


91 posted on 06/13/2004 7:41:01 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Congratulations to you for making wise choices most of the time. You must understand that the choice to smoke is often one in a long line of unwise choices. While it doesn't apply to you, it applies often enough to generalize.


92 posted on 06/13/2004 7:43:23 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

The dope dealers are the cigarette companies which hook their customers for life.


93 posted on 06/13/2004 11:20:36 PM PDT by hotshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: hotshot

The dope dealers are the cigarette companies which hook their customers for life.

Your under a very huge misconception in your beliefs.  Smokers are NOT all hooked for life!

And I believe dope dealers live on back streets selling their poison, to which if caught, they go to prison.

Cigarettes are legal.  Can't you get that through your head yet?  It is a Legal Commodity and it's everyone's choice to try it, not like it  or as 55 million smokers attest:  they really enjoy smoking.

I tell you:  I have never seen the likes of being able to buy a legal commodity and yet being treated like a criminal for doing so.

If you don't like smokers or smoking........just stay away from them and it.  Why torture yourself over something that doesn't even concern you.

Take me:  I am not into guns but respect those that are fighting for their rights to continue to bare arms.  Do you ever see ME on a thread of the people in FR fighting for their rights there?  You won't see me.............although, if I was ask, I would fight with them to continue keeping their rights.

The smoking issue has nothing to do with you.  I think you just need something and someone to hate........and you have chosen good decent American's who choose to smoke a legal commodity.

Why don't you just move on to another thread where you can have a decent debate.  All you can spew on the smoker's thread is your hate and degust of us.  This is not what being a Conservation is about.


94 posted on 06/14/2004 5:46:29 AM PDT by SheLion (Don Imus is voting for FnKerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The In-law that I spoke about is a Maryland hospital today having a biopsy done on a spot in his lungs. Smoking does effect everyone.
95 posted on 06/14/2004 8:07:54 AM PDT by hotshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: hotshot
The In-law that I spoke about is a Maryland hospital today having a biopsy done on a spot in his lungs. Smoking does effect everyone.

Your wrong. You can not blame all the ills in the world on smoking! I am sorry, but I have lived long enough to realize this.

Smoking MIGHT have helped out, however, there are a lot of mitigating circumstances that brought this person to the condition he is in now.

His previous health condition, his working conditions, the foods he eats, and the list goes on and on.

You will never change my mind and I will never change yours.  We have come to an impasse and this is the end of our discussion.

Thank you.


96 posted on 06/14/2004 8:34:43 AM PDT by SheLion (Don Imus is voting for FnKerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
If they were really concerned about the economic impact on the poor people, they'd eliminate the taxes on the cigarettes.
The study, to be released today, said the poorest one-fifth of households spent 18 per cent of their income on cigarettes...

Not the most honest presentation of the subject is it.
This part is particularly ironic, but the expert anti-smoking propaganda spin makes it invisible:

said the poorest one-fifth of households spent 18 5 per cent of their income on cigarettes... ... and an aditional 13% on taxes... yes, the taxes are several times the actual cost of the cigarettes...

97 posted on 06/14/2004 9:39:13 AM PDT by Publius6961 (I don't do diplomacy either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson