Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoker's saliva a 'cocktail of chemicals'
Yahoo ^ | 06/02/04 | Reuters

Posted on 06/02/2004 4:43:14 AM PDT by Colosis

LONDON (Reuters) - Smoking destroys protective molecules in saliva and transforms it into a dangerous cocktail of chemicals that increases the risk of mouth cancer, scientists say.

"Cigarette smoke is not only damaging on its own, it can turn the body against itself," said Dr Rafi Nagler, of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel.

Saliva contains antioxidants, molecules that normally protect the body against cancer, but Nagler and his colleagues have discovered that cigarette smoke destroys the molecules and turns saliva into a dangerous compound.

"Our study shows that once exposed to cigarette smoke, our normally healthy saliva not only loses its beneficial qualities but it turns traitor and actually aids in destroying the cells of the mouth and oral cavity," he added.

In research reported in the British Journal of Cancer on Wednesday, Nagler and his team studied the impact of cigarette smoke on cancerous cells in the laboratory.

Half of the cells were exposed to saliva exposed to cigarette smoke and the other half just to the smoke. Cells exposed to the saliva mixture had more damage and it increased along with the time of exposure.

"Most people will find it very shocking that the mixture of saliva and smoke is actually more lethal to cells in the mouth than cigarette smoke alone," Nagler added in a statement.

Smoking and drinking are the leading causes of head and neck or oral cancers, which includes cancer of the lip, mouth, tongue, gums, larynx and pharynx. Nearly 400,000 new cases of the illness are diagnosed worldwide each year with the majority in developing countries. The five-year survival rates are less than 50 percent.

Nagler and his colleagues believe the research could open up new avenues to develop better treatments to prevent oral cancer.

"This insight into how mouth cancer can develop offers more reasons for smokers to try and quit," said Jean King, of Cancer Research UK, which publishes the journal. "People know the link with lung cancer and this research adds compelling evidence about the damage smoking can do to the mouth."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: health; pufflist; smokers; smoking; smokingbans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 901-905 next last
To: Judith Anne

Can't mix threads ya know, then the hypocracy would be out in plain view. It's hard to keep consistent when you have no true convictions, except to control others.....


221 posted on 06/02/2004 12:56:32 PM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

My neighbor's 10 year old daughter argues with the same style.


222 posted on 06/02/2004 12:57:06 PM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

"So does every other Vietnam veteran."

Besides making no sense, the only conclusion that can be taken from your statement is that you think all Vietnam Vets are antifreedom. Is that what your saying?


223 posted on 06/02/2004 12:58:39 PM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Can't mix threads ya know, then the hypocracy would be out in plain view. It's hard to keep consistent when you have no true convictions, except to control others.....

Please. I made no attempt to control others. I was responding only to posts made to me that were off-topic.

224 posted on 06/02/2004 1:00:41 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: CSM
the only conclusion that can be taken

The only conclusion that can be taken from your post is that you put no value on the VSM.

BTW, a Naval Vietnam Service Medal.......I heard even JFnK has one of those and he wasn't all that committed to freedom either.

225 posted on 06/02/2004 1:02:10 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
No proof, that's why. Statistics are NOT proof. And the general air of superiority that goes along with the use of statistics as proof, that too.

All it'll take is a 3 mile run to give you the proof that sucking butts is the antithesis of health.

226 posted on 06/02/2004 1:02:51 PM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Please. I am just saying why I will not respond to your off-topic questions. I am not trying to control your posts.

Now THAT gives me a good reason to hang around: to see how many REALLY stupid posts you'll make.

I have no concern that you will try to control my posts. As IF you could. And I hardly think that the question is off-topic. Would you take a statistical vote that my question is NOT off-topic? Do you want everyone to tell you what is crystal clear to everyone except you?

I'm saying that until you answer that question, you're a hypocrite. You can tell me it's off-topic until you're blue in the face, but that doesn't make it true. It makes YOU a phony. If you're that phony about a little anonymous internet question about smoking, then how can we believe you are honest about your medals? I tend to believe you're a pure-D phony.

227 posted on 06/02/2004 1:04:34 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: CSM
My neighbor's 10 year old daughter argues with the same style.

She also does not want to respond in kind when personally attacked. She shows a lot of maturity.

228 posted on 06/02/2004 1:05:13 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: CSM
I came here because I was interested in the topic. I replied to those that call anything negative about smoking "junk science" which is laughable.

When you hear of an old person that smokes it is because it is rare. That's why it makes the news.

Genetics do play by far the largest role in health but certainly you would admit that the average smoker has a shorter lifespan and is much more likely to suffer diseases of the lung as well as higher incidences of many other diseases.

229 posted on 06/02/2004 1:05:16 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

If I can't run three miles I'm not healthy?

Ridiculous!


230 posted on 06/02/2004 1:05:25 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

I used to smoke and was fortunate enough to leave it behind several years ago when I had to look at my dead cousin - 32 years old - his wife and two kids in the eye at his funeral after he died from Cancer of the esophagus and throat caused by smoking since he was 14.

That said, I can tell you with experience that the - shall we call them "nasal snails" one produces while smoking are by far more disgusting than your spit.
231 posted on 06/02/2004 1:06:05 PM PDT by IamConservative (A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
You'd think the risk of impotence would wake up at least half of them!

Nope. Given the choice between giving up cigs or sex they'd give up sex, as long as they remain addicted.

232 posted on 06/02/2004 1:06:34 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

No more than my NDSM. If I were trying to establish credibility I wouldn't post a picture of that medal. I would pick one that was actually awarded, not handed out to EVERYONE.

Now, is the conclusion I draw from your post correct? Are you taking the stance that all Vietnam Vets are antifreedom?


233 posted on 06/02/2004 1:06:41 PM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
I'm saying that until you answer that question, you're a hypocrite. You can tell me it's off-topic until you're blue in the face, but that doesn't make it true. It makes YOU a phony. If you're that phony about a little anonymous internet question about smoking, then how can we believe you are honest about your medals? I tend to believe you're a pure-D phony.

Whatever.

234 posted on 06/02/2004 1:07:02 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Why would you enter a thread that you find offensive. If you find it offensive, you have the right to not enter and be exposed to the hazard of the truth.

LOL - that has to be the most ironic thing I have read in awhile. LOL!

Why would you enter a restaurant that you find offensive. If you find it offensive, you have the right to not enter and be exposed to the hazard of your own sissified nose.

235 posted on 06/02/2004 1:07:28 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Mears
If I can't run three miles I'm not healthy?

Ridiculous!

How 'bout walking a mile? Can ya catch a Camel?

236 posted on 06/02/2004 1:07:45 PM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

I'm fifty six. I walked 20 miles in 5 hours with a 34 pound pack on a hot June day. I mow my hilly acre every week with a cheap gas mower, I work 12 hour shifts ON MY FEET with no break (and no smoking) 3-4 times a week. I have no problem not smoking, I have no problem smoking.

Incidently, I have arthritis. Do you suppose it's smoking-related?


237 posted on 06/02/2004 1:07:49 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Some people can't help it. They're sanctimonious. Sanctimonious people don't think right.

Like those who scream "junk science" when even they know the truth?

238 posted on 06/02/2004 1:08:28 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CSM
No more than my NDSM. If I were trying to establish credibility I wouldn't post a picture of that medal. I would pick one that was actually awarded, not handed out to EVERYONE.

Everyone? You have yours?

239 posted on 06/02/2004 1:08:40 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Read the title. It says nothing about freedom or obesity.

Every thread that, like this one, contains assertions of power to limit what I do in private with other consenting adults, is a thread about liberty.

240 posted on 06/02/2004 1:09:06 PM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 901-905 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson