Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SheLion
I am completely opposed to government imposed smoking bans. However, when private companies, such as Lowe's and Hasbro, want to ban smoking on their premises, I completely support them.

It is their company, their property. No one is entitled to a job with those companies. If a person can't abide by the rules set up by the company for workplace conduct, they need to find employment elsewhere.

I don't blame companies one bit for doing whatever they can to discourage smoking. The company pays the insurance bills. They are losing productivity when people go out to smoke. It's a matter of economics.

And it's true what the article says, it's not fair to non-smokers that smokers can go out for a break every hour or so. If a non-smoker goes outside and just lingers around socializing, they'd get reprimanded for it.

16 posted on 04/05/2004 8:44:13 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
I don't blame companies one bit for doing whatever they can to discourage smoking. The company pays the insurance bills.

Obesity is now the number one killer of Americans. Is Lowes going to remove all vending machines from their break areas?

22 posted on 04/05/2004 8:50:58 AM PDT by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
However, when private companies, such as Lowe's and Hasbro, want to ban smoking on their premises, I completely support them.

Then you agree that these are "private property's?"  Then you also believe that restaurants are also "private property's" and should be run the way the business owner decides, and not the state government?

The company pays the insurance bills. They are losing productivity when people go out to smoke. It's a matter of economics.

Ahhh. Wrong.  I pay for my own insurance.  Always have.  If I got sick, my insurance paid for me.  Not my place of employment.

If a non-smoker goes outside and just lingers around socializing, they'd get reprimanded for it.

Read my previous posts.

24 posted on 04/05/2004 8:52:01 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
am completely opposed to government imposed smoking bans. However, when private companies, such as Lowe's and Hasbro, want to ban smoking on their premises, I completely support them.

It is their company, their property. No one is entitled to a job with those companies. If a person can't abide by the rules set up by the company for workplace conduct, they need to find employment elsewhere.

I agree completely. It is private property. The wishes of the property owner must be respected. I don't allow smoking in my home, and this is little different.

33 posted on 04/05/2004 9:00:37 AM PDT by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
You and I, as non-employees, can smoke in our cars and walking through the parking lot at Lowes. We just can't smoke in their building.
:O)
58 posted on 04/05/2004 9:26:41 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson