Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS Amendments 1-10 of the Constitution
the people

Posted on 01/01/2004 3:49:02 AM PST by sopwith

The Conventions of a number of the States having, at the time of adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added, and as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution;

Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two-thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States; all or any of which articles, when ratified by three-fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the said Constitution, namely:

Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: bor; constitution; originaldocuments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2004 3:49:02 AM PST by sopwith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

WAKE UP, AMURRICA!

What part of this guarantee of freedom of religion and speech is NOT under attack and being ignored by courts across the land? And what is not being attacked or ignored, is parsed to impossible limits. Burning of the Flag, despicable an act though it may be, or flipping someone off, is protected as "free speech", yet the Feingold/McCain campaign finance reform is in direct contradiction to the spirit and letter of this Amendment, and not found to be unconstitutional. This issue must be revisited again.

2 posted on 01/01/2004 4:24:46 AM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Dude, you're gonna get arrested for inciting a riot or something. Now be a nice citizen and forget all these grand ideas of 'liberty' and stuff.
3 posted on 01/01/2004 4:26:28 AM PST by ovrtaxt (The income tax is the monetary equivalent of gun control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
I think we could forget all this money for running for office if we did one thing. Open OUR air waves on radio and TV to the public free of charge 1 hour a day during elections , in prime time, for the people who run. When we give money we may as well just sent it to the TV companies.This is fair if we really are the people who run this country.
4 posted on 01/01/2004 4:37:53 AM PST by sawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sawyer
bump
5 posted on 01/01/2004 4:43:48 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Sure, that document looks great, but it'll never hold up in court.
6 posted on 01/01/2004 4:46:22 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
it'll never hold up in court. It's obviously unconstitutional . . .
7 posted on 01/01/2004 5:00:33 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Belief in your own objectivity is the essence of subjectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Thanks for posting these quaint historical documents. At one time in America, they were the supreme law of the land.

Feel free to add to this list.

8 posted on 01/01/2004 5:01:15 AM PST by snopercod (Wishing y'all a prosperous, happy, and FREE new year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sawyer
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3ba20deb5ac5.htm
9 posted on 01/01/2004 5:02:02 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Belief in your own objectivity is the essence of subjectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Ya' know what makes me sick...

What's that guy's name?

10 posted on 01/01/2004 5:03:26 AM PST by snopercod (Wishing y'all a prosperous, happy, and FREE new year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Earl Pitts?
11 posted on 01/01/2004 5:10:23 AM PST by luigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
post 8.
Thats worthy for an op. ed.
12 posted on 01/01/2004 5:12:43 AM PST by sopwith (don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Absolutely brilliant summary.

And the sad sad sad thing is some "conservatives" don't even know enough history to know that most of the damage was done in during and post the New Deal.

Rolling back the New Deal used to be the definition of "Republican." Now, even highly educated conservatives like Laura Ingram parrot the government line on atrocities like the Patriot Act.
13 posted on 01/01/2004 5:23:44 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
great post
14 posted on 01/01/2004 5:24:17 AM PST by orlop9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luigi
That's HIM! Thank you. http://www.earlpitts.com/
15 posted on 01/01/2004 5:34:39 AM PST by snopercod (Wishing y'all a prosperous, happy, and FREE new year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: orlop9
There are eleven, not ten, amendments in the Bill of Rights, the 27th being part of the original twelve passed by Congress as the proposed Bill of Rights.
16 posted on 01/01/2004 5:34:52 AM PST by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
There are eleven, not ten, amendments in the Bill of Rights, the 27th being part of the original twelve passed by Congress as the proposed Bill of Rights.
17 posted on 01/01/2004 5:35:22 AM PST by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
Old, outdated and not relevant to the dynamic changes of the modern world. I'll shut up know for fear of Rat note takers.
18 posted on 01/01/2004 6:41:49 AM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Amendment X - "States Rights" have been null and void since the civil war and the passage of Amendment XIV in 1866.

  Amendment XIV
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

________________________________________

There is nothing in the 14th that nullifies/voids the 10th. -- It merely makes clear that states cannot violate our individual rights as outlined in the rest of the constitution.

States have never had the delegated power to infringe upon our enumerated/ unenumerated rights, -- as is made clear by the preamble to the BOR's, -- which states that "when ratified", - it is, - " to be valid for all intents and purposes, as part of said Constitution".
Article VI states that our Constitution: "-- shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound therby; --"

Your ideas about "states rights" are being used by states like CA to violate our 2nd amendment, by prohibiting so-called 'assault weapons'.

19 posted on 01/01/2004 6:43:17 AM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out me devils. Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Amendment X was also assaulted by Carter's creation of the Dep't of Education.
20 posted on 01/01/2004 6:58:17 AM PST by Marauder (If God lived on earth, liberals would sue Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson