Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole Remembers The USS Mount Hood (AE-11) - March 12th, 2004
see educational sources

Posted on 03/12/2004 3:36:30 AM PST by snippy_about_it



Lord,

Keep our Troops forever in Your care

Give them victory over the enemy...

Grant them a safe and swift return...

Bless those who mourn the lost.
.

FReepers from the Foxhole join in prayer
for all those serving their country at this time.



...................................................................................... ...........................................

U.S. Military History, Current Events and Veterans Issues

Where Duty, Honor and Country
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.

Our Mission:

The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans.

In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support.

The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer.

If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions.

We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.

To read previous Foxhole threads or
to add the Foxhole to your sidebar,
click on the books below.

USS Mount Hood (AE-11)



1944 -1944


USS Mount Hood, a 13910-ton ammunition ship, was built at Wilmington, North Carolina, and converted for Naval service at Norfolk, Virginia. Commissioned in July 1944, she transited the Panama Canal in August and was assigned to the South Pacific area to provide ammunition to the fighting forces. On the morning of 10 November 1944, while she was moored at the Manus Naval Base, Admiralty Islands, Mount Hood's cargo of explosives detonated in a massive blast. The ship was utterly destroyed by the accident, which killed all those on board her. Damage and casualties were also inflicted on ships anchored as far as 2000 yards away. Personnel casualties on Mount Hood and on other vessels totalled 45 known dead, 327 missing and 371 injured.


Off the Norfolk Navy Yard, Virginia, 16 July 1944. She is painted in camouflage Measure 32, Design 18F. Photograph from the Bureau of Ships Collection in the U.S. National Archives.


Underway in Hampton Roads, Virginia, 6 August 1944. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.




Explosion, 10 November 1944

Photographs of the actual explosion are presented in approximately the same order as taken.



The photograph was taken by a sailor from Spencer, West Virginia, who gave it to the donor. Donation of Admiral Felix B. Stump, 1963. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.


Photographed by a photographer of the 57th Construction Battalion, who had set up his camera to take pictures of the Battalion's camp.
Note smoke trails left by fragments ejected by the explosion, and splashes at their impact points.
Collection of Commander Lester B. Marx, Commanding Officer of the 57th C.B. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.



Note smoke trails left by fragments ejected by the explosion. Copied from the War Diary, Manus Naval Base, for November 1944. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.


USS Mount Hood (AE-11) Explosion as seen from the Naval Supply Depot on Manus. Copied from the War Diary, Naval Base, Manus, for November 1944. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.


Smoke cloud expanding, just after she exploded. Photographed by a photographer of the 57th Construction Battalion, who had set up his camera to take pictures of the Battalion's camp.
Collection of Commander Lester B. Marx. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.



Salvage and rescue work underway on USS Mindanao (ARG-3) shortly after Mount Hood blew up about 350 yards away. Note heavy damage to Mindanao's hull and superstructure, including large holes from fragment impacts. View looks forward from alongside her port quarter.

USS Mindanao had 180 crewmen killed and injured by this explosion. She was under repair until 21 December 1944.
Small craft alongside or nearby include (from left) YPB-6 (probable identification), two LCVPs and YPB-7.
Copied from the War Diary, Manus Naval Base, for November 1944. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.



Four motor minesweepers (YMS) alongside the starboard side of USS Mindanao (ARG-3) shortly after Mount Hood blew up about 350 yards away from Mindanao's port side. These wooden minesweepers were protected from most of the direct force of the blast by Mindanao's hull, but received some damage.

USS YMS-340 is second from the left. Note that her open bridge bulwarks have been blown down. Also note differing types of retracting accoustic "hammer box" mountings on the bows of these ships.

Copied from the War Diary, Manus Naval Base, for November 1944. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.



Damage to Quonset huts atop the barge YF-681 from concussion from the explosion that destroyed USS Mount Hood. The barge is alongside USS Argonne (AG-31), which was also damaged by the blast.
Copied from the War Diary, Manus Naval Base, for November 1944. U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph.





FReeper Foxhole Armed Services Links




TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: ammoship; freeperfoxhole; manusisland; manusnavalbase; samsdayoff; usnavy; ussmounthoodae11; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: stand watie
!!!!!

free dixie!
41 posted on 03/12/2004 10:06:18 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Good Friday afternoon Valin. Only a few more hours left of foolin' to do!
42 posted on 03/12/2004 10:06:53 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

Air Power
Yokosuka P1Y1 "Ginga"

The Allied forces facing Japan in the Pacific War had a number of highly effective fast twin-engined light and medium bombers to choose from. Japan, however, lacked an equivalent aircraft until 1944, the year the Army's Ki-67 Hiryu first saw combat and the Navy received its first examples of the P1Y1 Ginga (Milky Way). Designed by the Yokosuka Naval Air Technical Arsenal and built primarily by Nakajima (with some examples made by Kawanishi), the sparkling performance of the prototype led the Navy to order it into production almost immediately. But the serviceability and reliability of the Ginga right off the production line was very low; thus, it wasn't formally accepted by the Navy until October 1944, and it saw no combat until the Okinawan campaign in 1945.

The Yokosuka Arsenal in 1940 began development of the Ginga to fulfill the requirements of a specification calling for a fast twin-engined bomber capable of making dive and torpedo bombing attacks. The specification was clearly influenced by the Junkers Ju 88 which was just entering combat in Europe, but the aircraft created by Tadanao Mitsuzi and Masao Yamana was no mere copy of the Ju 88. It was a cleanly designed twin-engined airplane with mid-mounted wings on a narrow fuselage of circular cross-section. The proposed engines were twin Nakajima Homare eighteen-cylinder air-cooled radials, which were then in the design stage. With a pair of Homares, the new aircraft was expected to reach a top speed of 345 mph at altitude, and as range was considered all-important for a Japanese land-based bomber, eight protected and six unprotected fuel tanks with a total capacity of 1,218 gallons were to be installed in the wings. Provision was also made for two underwing 48-gallon drop tanks, and oil tanks in each engine nacelle. But armor was restricted to a single 20mm plate behind the pilot's head. The proposed defensive armament was to be just two guns, one in the nose and the other in a flexible dorsal mount; by European/American standards, this was wholly inadequate, and the plane was expected to rely on its speed and maneuverability to escape interceptors. As for the offensive payload, one 1,764-lb. torpedo was to be carried semi-internally under the fuselage, or else two 1,102-lb. bombs were to be carried in the ventral bomb bay.

While the design of the Y-20, as the Imperial Navy designated the prototype, was proceeding, actual production of the new aircraft was assigned to Nakajima. When production of the G3M3 bomber (Nell) terminated as scheduled in February 1943 with the last five examples being rolled out of the Koizumi plant, the G3M3 assembly lines were swiftly dismantled to allow the Y-20 to be built in quantity. The first prototype, powered by a brace of Nakajima Homare 11 engines rated at 1,820 horsepower and driving three-bladed constant-speed propellers, was completed in August 1943. It made its first flight shortly afterward. Both the company's and the Navy's test pilots were enthusiastic about the new plane's high turn of speed and ease of handling in the air, but the ground crews-even the expert mechanics from Nakajima-complained bitterly about the Y-20's troublesome hydraulics and unreliable engines. Even with the favorable conditions obtained during the flight-testing program, the Y-20 was cursed with horrendous maintenance difficulties, and although ordered into production before all six prototypes were built and flown, its formal service acceptance was delayed for thirteen months. Thus, 453 examples were built in all that time, yet they sat idly by while the war situation deteriorated alarmingly for Japan.

During that thirteen-month period, a number of changes and simplifications were made on the assembly lines. The former curved windscreen was replaced by a flatter one incorporating a bulletproof panel, flat-headed rivets were used in the fuselage's construction instead of flush rivets, and the former collector-ring exhaust stacks were replaced by individual stacks to give thrust augmentation. Later production examples also differed from the prototype by having the slightly more powerful Homare 12 (1,825 hp) replacing the Homare 11 (the three-bladed propellers were retained throughout the craft's service life), and by fitting a fixed tailwheel in place of the former retractable one. The prototype Y-20 had a single 7.7mm machine gun in the nose and a 20mm cannon in the dorsal position, but production aircraft had a 20mm gun in the nose, and later, single or twin 13mm machine guns replaced the slow-firing 20mm cannon in the dorsal mount. Very late production aircraft, towards the end of the war, had air-to-surface search radar, and it was also planned to use the P1Y as a mother craft for the Ohka flying bomb, as will be related below.

Finally in October 1944, the Navy gave its blessing to the Y-20, and it became formally known as the P1Y1 Navy Bomber Ginga Model 11

Specifications:
Design Bureau: Dai-Ichi Kaigun Koku Gijitsusho
Manufacturer: Nakajima
Type: twin-engined medium bomber
Crew: three
Engine: two Nakajima NK9C Homare 11 eighteen-cylinder air-cooled radial engines, each rated at 1,820 hp
Allied Code Name: Frances

Performance :
cruising speed: 230 mph
Max speed: 340 mph at 19,355 feet
Max range: 3,338 miles
Service Ceiling: 30,840 feet

Dimensions:
wingspan: 65 feet, 7 inches
length: 49 feet, 2.5 inches
height: 14 feet, 1 inch
Weights: empty 16,017 lbs / loaded 23,149 lbs / maximum 29,762 lbs

Armaments:
one flexible 20-mm Type 99 cannon mounted in the nose;
one flexible rearward-firing 20-mm Type 99 cannon mounted in rear cockpit;
one 1,764 lb torpedo or up to 2,205 lbs of bombs



Note marking on the plane. (must have been a capture)



All information and photos Copyright of their respective websites
43 posted on 03/12/2004 10:07:35 AM PST by Johnny Gage (Will ZOT! for beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
So what are your thoughts on whether or not this was mishandling of ammo or a hit from a Japanese midgit sub?
44 posted on 03/12/2004 10:08:39 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Yes, I believe she is, rather was, the AE29 or 26 and she was decomissioned, they held a ceremony and had relatives of those lost on the AE-11 attend her decomissioning.
45 posted on 03/12/2004 10:10:06 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
The thing that would do me in would be my total lack of patience.

LOL. I'm sorry, I just had to butt in on this post and to laugh at your comment. You are soooo patient yet so antsy. Someday I'll find the words to describe what seems to be a conflict of these two things I admire about you. ;-)

46 posted on 03/12/2004 10:14:00 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Colt .45
You can say that again!
47 posted on 03/12/2004 10:16:14 AM PST by Professional Engineer (California refugee: Will FReep for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
I would say it was probably more a case of the former, than the latter. Look at the Port Chicago disaster and tell me that sailors weren't lax about what they were dealing with. Of course anytime there is a disaster and the inquiry happens, sailors will always look for other things to blame it on. But the truth is carelessness causes most ordnance mishaps. I know this first hand having survived the USS NIMITZ Flight Deck fire of Nov. 30th, 1988. It was cause by an ordnanceman NOT FOLLOWING proper procedures and taking a short cut.
48 posted on 03/12/2004 10:22:53 AM PST by Colt .45 ( Veteran - Pride in my Southern Ancestry! Falsum etiam est verum quod constituit superior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Diva Betsy Ross
Good afternoon and welcome to the FReeper Foxhole.
49 posted on 03/12/2004 10:23:49 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Colt .45
Good afternoon Colt .45, it is a reminder that many, many jobs in our services are highly dangerous. We thank you for your service.
50 posted on 03/12/2004 10:25:55 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Thanks Johnny. I've never heard of this one before.
51 posted on 03/12/2004 10:28:49 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Colt .45
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
52 posted on 03/12/2004 10:29:36 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
I know that it is probably not what you wanted to hear, but its the truth.
53 posted on 03/12/2004 10:32:14 AM PST by Colt .45 ( Veteran - Pride in my Southern Ancestry! Falsum etiam est verum quod constituit superior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Thanks! I have been meaning to stop by for a long time.. I am glad my friend SW pinged me here.
54 posted on 03/12/2004 10:53:19 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (Every heart beats true for the red ,white and blue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
I'm takin the day off!
55 posted on 03/12/2004 11:02:12 AM PST by Valin (Hating people is like burning down your house to kill a rat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Thanks Johnny. I wasn't familiar with this one.


56 posted on 03/12/2004 11:18:15 AM PST by SAMWolf (John Kerry is not indecisive and wishy-washy. He consistantly gives aid and comfort to our enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave
Morning DD. Prayers offered for your Father-in-Law, George and the family. Sounds like a feisty guy, good for him!
57 posted on 03/12/2004 11:19:54 AM PST by SAMWolf (John Kerry is not indecisive and wishy-washy. He consistantly gives aid and comfort to our enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Diva Betsy Ross
Hi Diva Betsy Ross. Welcome to the Foxhole.

Nice patriotic screen name. :-)

58 posted on 03/12/2004 11:21:33 AM PST by SAMWolf (John Kerry is not indecisive and wishy-washy. He consistantly gives aid and comfort to our enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
Morning PE.

This is the USS MOUNT HOOD that came to Portland every year for the Rose Festival



USS Mount Hood (AE 29)
decommissioned

USS MOUNT HOOD was the fourth ship in the KILAUEA class of ammunition ships and the second ship of the fleet to bear the name of the extinct volcano in the Cascade Mountain Range of Oregon. The "Good Hood" as it was called by the ships it served, was deployed to the Western Pacific for the first time on 27 April 1972, and has completed three war-time and thirteen peace-time cruises since that time. MOUNT HOOD was homeported in Concord, CA, and as of December 1999, she is held in reserve at Bremerton, Washington, and is designated a Naval Fleet Auxiliary.

59 posted on 03/12/2004 11:24:46 AM PST by SAMWolf (John Kerry is not indecisive and wishy-washy. He consistantly gives aid and comfort to our enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
I think he knows everything

I wish! :-)

60 posted on 03/12/2004 11:25:20 AM PST by SAMWolf (John Kerry is not indecisive and wishy-washy. He consistantly gives aid and comfort to our enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson