Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckleberry hates freedom
OC Register ^ | May 29th, 2008, 4:20 pm | Steven Greenhut

Posted on 06/02/2008 5:55:15 AM PDT by Globalist Goon

Huckleberry hates freedom

May 29th, 2008, 4:20 pm · posted by Steven Greenhut

Former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee always set my teeth on edge, from his hokey folksy manner to his love of big government to his shameless use of his religion for political gain. But now I understand exactly why I found the Huckster to be so offensive (and it’s hard to stand out on that score given the overall quality of presidential candidates this year). Here, hat tip to AndrewSullivan.com, is a quotation from Huckleberry on Huffington Post regarding libertarianism:

“The greatest threat to classic Republicanism is not liberalism; it’s this new brand of libertarianism, which is social liberalism and economic conservatism, but it’s a heartless, callous, soulless type of economic conservatism because it says ‘look, we want to cut taxes and eliminate government. If it means that elderly people don’t get their Medicare drugs, so be it. If it means little kids go without education and healthcare, so be it.’ Well, that might be a quote pure economic conservative message, but it’s not an American message.”

So libertarians are unAmerican? Actually, the Huckster completely misstates what libertarianism is about. We don’t advocate kids going without education, but a free system — which will lead to kids getting a far better education than the one they get in the government schools Huckabee loves. We believe in freedom, not government coercion.

Huckabee makes clear what modern Republicanism is all about: paying for government, which explains his support for massive tax increases. The Huckster does make a good point when he explains:

“My experience in Arkansas was, a lot of the so-called conservatives said ‘Let’s cut the budget.’ But they wanted to add prison sentences, they wanted to eliminate parole, they wanted to have harsher sentences for various crimes. And I said ‘OK, that’s fine, but that’s going to be expensive. So which do you want?’ You can’t have both, or you do what the federal government has done, and this is where I think Republicans have been especially irresponsible. Their approach has been [to] just kick the can down the road and let your grandkids pay for it.”

Yes, Republicans such as George W. Bush and Arnold Schwarzenegger keep spending, but increase the debt rather than raise taxes. That’s a good point, but Huckleberry agrees with Democrats: increase spending AND increase taxes. It’s honest, any way, but the libertarian alternative — finding market solutions, reducing government, increasing individual responsibility — is far more fair and sustainable.


TOPICS: General Discussion
KEYWORDS: huckabee; huckster; taxhikemike
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Dat

mark


21 posted on 06/09/2008 7:58:26 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: angkor
Turns out (as Barry Goldwater then predicted), the Religionsists have virtually destroyed the GOP

You certainly couldn't be referring to the same Goldwater who couldn't convince more than 1 in 3 Americans to vote for him. Compared to him, Bush is a political savant.

22 posted on 07/01/2008 1:51:07 AM PDT by eclecticEel (men who believe deeply in something, even wrong, usually triumph over men who believe in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
You certainly couldn't be referring to the same Goldwater who couldn't convince more than 1 in 3 Americans to vote for him. Compared to him, Bush is a political savant.

I'm referring to the man who almost single-handedly resurrected conservatism after decades of federal Democrat control, and who (most historians concede) ran a hopeless 1964 campaign against the formidable memory of JFK, and not against the "charismatic" presence of Lyndon Johnson.

I'm referring to the same Goldwater who virtually any thinking and honest conservative will admit put conservatism back on the political stage for the first time in the 20th century.

It's simply dishonest to assert otherwise.

Please list GWB's lasting legacies to conservatism:

1) ......
2) ......

23 posted on 07/01/2008 7:49:25 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Globalist Goon

Suckapee is a pig. I can barley stomach McCain. I don’t think I could’ve voted for Huckaduck, even to stop OsmamaObama.


24 posted on 07/12/2008 11:22:41 PM PDT by Impy (Hey Barack, you're ugly and your wife smells.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

There were liberal RINOs 40 years ago. And long before that. Ever hear of the “progressive” wing?


25 posted on 07/12/2008 11:26:07 PM PDT by Impy (Hey Barack, you're ugly and your wife smells.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Of course. You must have missed my last 7,234 rants against Progressives and their running dog lackeys who brought us all the misery and war of the 20th century.


26 posted on 07/13/2008 4:51:04 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: angkor
I think you are talking about the Holy Rollers. The hard core of the Republican party has been since its founding Methodists, Baptists, Christian Church people, and Nazarenes.

Barry Goldwater was an Episcopal, and back when those people were still Christian they were Republican stalwarts.

27 posted on 07/13/2008 5:57:20 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Screw the Cubs. Screw the Socks.


28 posted on 07/13/2008 6:00:19 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

>>>I think you are talking about the Holy Rollers.

Kind of, yes.

I’m not remotely against religion (I come from 300 years of American Protestants), but I’m vehemently opposed to the Religionist attempt to takeover the GOP and conservatism.


29 posted on 07/13/2008 6:07:03 AM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You must Huckabee’s rotund wife. I’m sorry I insulted your husband.


30 posted on 07/13/2008 1:37:19 PM PDT by Impy (Hey Barack, you're ugly and your wife smells.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

Meanwhile before the “Reps die on the vine” the rats win every seat cause you split the vote.


31 posted on 08/15/2008 6:02:19 AM PDT by Impy (Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Huckabee is an loon but so was Goldwater. Any nutcase that believed in UFOs should never have held statewide office let alone run on a major party ticket.


32 posted on 10/18/2008 1:07:53 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson