Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul For The Republican Nomination (Endorses Paul and Democrats)
TheAtlantic.com ^ | December 17, 2007 | Andrew Sullivan

Posted on 12/17/2007 10:03:51 AM PST by CableNewsJunkie2

By now, readers will know who I favor in the Democratic race. Here's my most considered case. But what of the GOP? For me, it comes down to two men, Ron Paul and John McCain. That may sound strange, because in many ways they are polar opposites: the champion of the surge and the non-interventionist against the Iraq war; the occasional meddling boss of Washington and the live-and-let-live libertarian from Texas. But picking a candidate is always a mix of policy and character, of pragmatism and principle. And what these two mavericks share, to my mind, is a modicum of integrity.

(Excerpt) Read more at andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Candidates
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsement; 2008endorsements; gayvote; hillaryclinton; inyourguts; johnmccain; kittychow; queersforpaul; retread; ronpaul; ronpaulcult; sniff; vikingkitties; vk; war; welcometofr; youknowhesnuts; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-146 next last
To: wideawake
"The Ron Paul campaign is employing the "sideshow tent" strategy: every marginal coven of freaks, from 9/11 Truthers to neo-Nazis to gay militants to goldbugs to Cindy Sheehan and her personalities, is welcome inside Paul's midway attraction in exchange for a small donation."

Bullseye!

81 posted on 12/17/2007 11:35:25 AM PST by lormand ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
because they think that if Paul is elected he will legalize marijuana and then the prices will fall

I haven't been referring to him as PaulPot for nothing :>)

82 posted on 12/17/2007 11:37:57 AM PST by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan; Travis McGee; calcowgirl; All

Do you think Paul regrets sponsoring these pieces of legislation?

1st Session

H. CON. RES. 277

Recognizing the important contributions of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

November 19, 2001

Mr. PAUL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the important contributions of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of the United States has had a significant impact among Hispanic businesses, and in the business community in general;

Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has served in a key support role, not merely as a business group but also as a civic organization working in the Hispanic-American community; and

Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has helped to bring entrepreneurship to the Hispanic community as well as helping to pool the resources and talents of Hispanic American entrepreneurs: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that it is important to the promotion of the free market process of the United States, to the future success of Hispanic Americans, and to society at large that the special role of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of the United States be recognized and further cultivated to the benefit of all Americans.


Or this one he SPONSORED

107th H.CON.RES.206 : Recognizing the important relationship between the United States and Mexico. Sponsor: Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] (introduced 7/31/2001) Cosponsors (8) Committees: House International Relations H. CON. RES. 206

Recognizing the important relationship between the United States and Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 31, 2001

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. NETHERCUTT, and Mr. DREIER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the important relationship between the United States and Mexico.

Whereas the United States and Mexico share a special bilateral friendship matched by few other countries in the world;

Whereas the United States and Mexico are partners joined by geography as well as by a series of government-to-government and private relationships which are of critical importance to both countries;

Whereas the United States and Mexico share concern on a wide range of issues, including trade and immigration, environmental quality, economic development, and regional security and stability; and

Whereas the special relationship between the United States and Mexico is critically important in its own right as well as serving as a linchpin in the relationship between the United States and every nation in Central and South America: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that it is in keeping with the just interests of the United States that the special nature of the relationship between the United States and Mexico be recognized and further cultivated to the mutual benefit of both countries.


http://www.house.gov/paul/legis.shtml


83 posted on 12/17/2007 11:38:39 AM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Paultard Fatboy...my fave!


84 posted on 12/17/2007 11:38:59 AM PST by lormand ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Bingo!

"CableNewsJunkie This account has been banned or suspended."

85 posted on 12/17/2007 11:40:39 AM PST by lormand ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CableNewsJunkie2
account banned or suspended, he must have mice

funny pictures

86 posted on 12/17/2007 11:43:31 AM PST by backinthefold (shhh, here come someone... act like a cat... meow meow purrrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CableNewsJunkie2

Um... Welcome to FR.


87 posted on 12/17/2007 11:44:06 AM PST by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"but I’m sick of getting criticized for not being a libertarian on a CONSERVATIVE forum."

I'm withya pal.

I like being around my own kind. Besides...

...when you fix all the things wrong with Libertarianism, you get Conservatism.

88 posted on 12/17/2007 11:44:31 AM PST by lormand ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
I wonder if Paul regrets saying "The United States should not have a national immigration policy and welcome anyone who wants to come here and work"
89 posted on 12/17/2007 11:46:23 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Crap!

I didn't know such a ping list existed. I gotta get on this list please, it is one of my favorite pass times on FR, witnessing the hand of zot.

90 posted on 12/17/2007 11:47:47 AM PST by lormand ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Done.


91 posted on 12/17/2007 11:49:10 AM PST by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Damn! That’s a great name, I’ll have to steal it!


92 posted on 12/17/2007 11:50:24 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Paultard Fatboy...my fave!

Yep, no matter how many times I see that, it doesn't get old.

93 posted on 12/17/2007 11:52:16 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

That’s funny. He introduces those, but votes against condemning Iran because it’s not in the Constitution. Guess theres an article allowing happy resolutions but barring nasty one somewhere in there.


94 posted on 12/17/2007 11:52:55 AM PST by SJackson (If she'd lived, Kopechne would be 62..Ted Kennedy would have brought comfort to her in her old age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

“”The United States should not have a national immigration policy and welcome anyone who wants to come here and work””

Do you happen to have a link for that quote? I have seen it before. Ron’s solution to the illegal immigration problem has always been ‘cut off welfare’....something he couldn’t do in congress and congress will NEVER do.


95 posted on 12/17/2007 11:53:00 AM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Just more of the Ron Paul ‘consistency’. LOL

He has co sponsored so much socialist liberal legislation it’s not even funny.


96 posted on 12/17/2007 11:54:58 AM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Damn! That’s a great name, I’ll have to steal it!

I came up with it sometime last week. Be my guest.

97 posted on 12/17/2007 11:57:31 AM PST by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Here you go..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938921/posts

My paraphrase didn’t accurately represent it. He said we ‘should’ allow anyone in who wants to come here to work. My original paraphrase could have been read we should ‘not’ let them come in.. that is the opposite of what he said.

98 posted on 12/17/2007 12:00:54 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

IATZ!!!

Looks like I missed a live troll.


99 posted on 12/17/2007 12:01:36 PM PST by StC (If you care for free speech, FIGHT THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Go ahead and add me too, DW.


100 posted on 12/17/2007 12:04:09 PM PST by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson