Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: George W. Bush

Ron Paul is being set up as the 2008 election’s Ross Perot. Only way Hillary could win is to split the Republican vote since she won’t get 50%. Just like her husband, she’ll coast in wih a low 40%

Wonder how much of Paul’s donations are from Soros and othr Hillary backers?


19 posted on 11/07/2007 6:45:56 AM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KosmicKitty

Most of his money is coming from people attempting to pull a 5th column on the GOP.

Funny thing is that no-one is falling for it.


21 posted on 11/07/2007 6:49:31 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (In regards to Ron Paul, Please see http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1889318/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: KosmicKitty; LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Ron Paul is being set up as the 2008 election’s Ross Perot. Only way Hillary could win is to split the Republican vote since she won’t get 50%. Just like her husband, she’ll coast in wih a low 40% Wonder how much of Paul’s donations are from Soros and othr Hillary backers?

Soros' previous maneuvers involved used large numbers of donors at the $2300 level who were overpaid socialist leeches that "worked" for his 501c Lefty non-profits.

The average donor to RP's campaign is at $100 or less. The average for two days ago was 38,000 people donating $100 or more each. And the campaign released figures that only 3% of their donors were maxxed out at $2300, so unlike the donor lists for McCain, Romney, Giuliani, Xlinton, and even Obama to a lesser degree. Admittedly, Obama does have a lot of small donors so you have to give him credit for that, I think.

It's hard to assemble such a picture of a Soros-backed RP moneybomb. And we have very few (maybe none) actual Code Pink and MoveOn leadership types (Soros-paid minions) who are supporting or donating to Ron Paul. They routinely warn all their followers at HuffPost and DailyKo(ook)s to avoid RP despite his antiwar agenda because their pro-socialism agenda is far more important than their fake antiwar agenda which is not principled at all except as an expression of their anti-Americanism. After all, these are hardened Lefties, many of them from the old communist Left in this country, and they actually like American soldiers to die. They aren't all that opposed to war, no matter how many demonstration they hold. Just as the Dim feminists loved to defend the Rapist-In-Chief, these Code Pinkers and MoveOns will make some little fuss if President Hitlery is elected and then stand by silently, waiting to defend her as she conducts military operations around the world, possibly getting the fig leaf of socialist goodness because Hitlery would put our soldiers under U.N. command which would be in keeping with the Left's goal of destroying American sovereignty, making our best and most effective soldiers quit in disgust and move the progress of socialist global government forward, the only thing they like even more than American socialism.

No, despite the fevered parroting of the Soros accusation here at FR, there is no indication whatsoever that Soros is backing Ron Paul as a divider. See my post above on why and how the GOP might try to get RP to run as a spoiler against Hitlery, just as they are currently trying to get Bloomberg to run.

Now if you want to know who is funding and supporting the enemy (Hitlery), look at Rupert Murdoch who is funneling huge money to Hitlery and who's Fox News is a complete free ad from the leftwing mayor and look at the donations of Fox News employees who, as Dr. John Lott has investigated and reproted, are donating to Dim candidates at a rate of over 80% currently.

If you want to look for the real Soros figure and organization in this election year, it's Rupert Murdoch and Fox News who are funding and supporting Hitlery and the Dims with Guiliani as their backup in case she doesn't win. It's disgusting and I won't watch that channel any more until I see them return to what FNC was when it started.
26 posted on 11/07/2007 7:09:47 AM PST by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: KosmicKitty
If Ron Paul runs third party that is where the similarity will end. It isn't that complicated, though. Ross Perot attracted voters who were to mad to vote for Read-my-lips, but didn't want to vote for Clinton.

In this election the likely Republican candidate is Rudy. If it is a contest between Rudy and Hillary and Paul decides to run third party after all, how would that hurt Rudy? Rudy and Hillary would be fighting over the same vote. If the Republican party nominates Rudy, they deserve to lose the election, anyway and Ron Paul has nothing to do with that.

31 posted on 11/07/2007 8:06:40 AM PST by Nephi ( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson