Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Paul Tops $5 Mil For Quarter
RealClearPolitics Politics ^ | October 03, 2007 | Reid Wilson

Posted on 10/03/2007 11:07:26 AM PDT by Captain Kirk

Texas Congressman Ron Paul, an anti-war libertarian making his second run at the White House, will report having raised $5.08 million in the third quarter. The number, which rivals those of John McCain and Bill Richardson, was boosted thanks to last-minute online fundraising that brought in more than $1.2 million in the last week of the quarter alone.

Paul has drawn himself in sharp contrast with the rest of the field, often engaging in loud exchanges with fellow candidates over his vehement opposition to the war in Iraq. His campaign has been marked by frugal spending and a surprisingly strong online fan base; he routinely wins online straw polls after debates.

This is the second quarter in a row Paul has shown fundraising strength. Last quarter he reported having more cash on hand than McCain, a sidebar that contributed to stories of McCain's collapse.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 10dollaragallongas; 3900troopswhocares; 5percenters; 911isapolicematter; 911isntworthawar; 911truth; afoolandhismoney; badatmath4paul; basementbrigade; bigstrongtallstupid; bow2mohammed; bow2sharialaw; braindeadzombiecult; bringourtroopshome; cairforronpaul; codepinkbuddies; codepinksezvotepaul; confusedforpaul08; cutandrun; dancingalqueda; dancingpalistinians; dncjumpforjoy; dncplanisworking; dontfight; droolerforpaul08; embraceterrorism; flight93whocares; forget911votepaul; freedomisoverrated; hillaryspaulboy; irrationalforpaul; islamropforpaul; jihadwonquitnow; koolaidneverbetter; libertyisntworthit; loveislam; loveterrorism; moonbat; moonies; moreterrorists; moveondotorgpaul08; moveonwantsronpaul; nowarforoil; paul; paulscodepinksupport; paulsnutbrigade; peaceispatriotic; peeinginthewind; pentagondeservedit; quitallwars; raisethewhiteflag; ronpaul; sumbit2thejihad; surrendermonkey; surrendernow; surrrender; terrorismgetused2it; terroristswin; thewarislost; timidwimpspaul08; tower7wasaciaplot; usmckickspaulsnuts; wtcwhocares; wussdiplomacy; wusseswantpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: George W. Bush

what did girliani raise?


21 posted on 10/03/2007 11:44:31 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Thanks for the post. I don't claim to have formed an educated opinion on Paul, but he would never get the Republican nomination for POTUS. That said, why isn't he running as Libertarian or an Independent?
22 posted on 10/03/2007 12:00:48 PM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh_of_mists
It’s just a half a dozen potheads spamming the campaign with money. /s

Now that's funny, I don't care who you are.

Thanks for the chuckle.

23 posted on 10/03/2007 12:02:42 PM PDT by NCSteve (I am not arguing with you - I am telling you. -- James Whistler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

Bump


24 posted on 10/03/2007 12:03:24 PM PDT by Proud2b4America (Protect and defend the Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Wow, I can only imagine how far left the people who gave the 5 million probably were.
25 posted on 10/03/2007 12:04:44 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

Why should he run as a Libertarian, be excluded from the debates, and get one percent of the vote or lower? He is already at 4 percent in some land-line polls and is debatig with the big boys.


26 posted on 10/03/2007 12:05:36 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Great post, thanks a lot. With money like this, and the frugal campaign spending, we can really start moving up now!


27 posted on 10/03/2007 12:10:36 PM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

He’s running as a Republican because he’s been elected to the US Congress as a Republican for 10 terms. He’s a Republican.


28 posted on 10/03/2007 12:11:53 PM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Wow, I can only imagine how far left the people who gave the 5 million probably were.

...says the Arnold supporter.

29 posted on 10/03/2007 12:12:43 PM PDT by jmc813 (.) (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
I don’t think Perot wanted to win, he wanted to keep George Bush from winning and he did. If he had really wanted to win he would not have dropped out and he would have picked another VP instead of that senile old man.

How anyone could take that team seriously is beyond me but lots of people did, enough to elect clinton. I know it is hard to imagine spending 60 million of his own money (your figure) on a vendetta, but I think that is exactly what he did. George Bush the elder embarrassed him by rebuffing his desires to join his administration so he fixed George I.

He probably made the 60 million back many times over, in payback from clinton.

30 posted on 10/03/2007 12:28:23 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

I’d like to invite all conservatives to join the Ron Paul train. You’re still welcome here. Failure to do so equates to giving Hillary the White House. Put the war issue aside for 20 seconds and think about socialized medicine, higher taxes, more inflation, amnesty for illegals, increased gun control and even more national debt. That’s what we are going to be faced with if we don’t support Ron Paul and get him elected. He is the only person who can beat Hillary in the general election. Don’t cut off your nose to spite your collective faces. It’s not too late to get on board with the only conservative who has a chance of beating her.


31 posted on 10/03/2007 12:32:04 PM PDT by Nashdiesel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Proud2b4America

Ross Perot without the big ears.


32 posted on 10/03/2007 12:33:26 PM PDT by BARLF (Who is Huma?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nashdiesel
Failure to do so equates to giving Hillary the White House.

This site discourages the use of hallucinogenic drugs.

33 posted on 10/03/2007 12:34:51 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Ok, maybe “quixotic” would be a better description.


34 posted on 10/03/2007 12:35:22 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nashdiesel

Thanks but NO thanks.

Where are my manners, welcome to FR newbie.

Did you sign up today to troll here?


35 posted on 10/03/2007 12:40:17 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
Rudy Showgirl


what did girliani raise?

His newest skirt, revealing some very nice fishnet pantyhose.
36 posted on 10/03/2007 12:53:26 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

While I really believe that a Paul vs. Clinton race would make LBJ vs. Goldwater look like a squeaker, I’ll be supporting our nominee (whoever he is) over Missus Clinton.


37 posted on 10/03/2007 12:55:53 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fred Thompson 2008, no need to "suspend disbelief" with him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: t_skoz
He’s running as a Republican because he’s been elected to the US Congress as a Republican for 10 terms. He’s a Republican.

You're right, he's a Republican Congressman. And he's running in the Republican primaries. Those are his choices.

However he's in disagreement with the Republican Party on most major issues. You can find the 2004 Platform here.

Paul is out of step on all positions regarding the WOT, Iraq and foreign affairs. The first issue addressed in the Platform.

Paul is out of step on Homeland Security.

Paul is out of step on economic issues. The platform calls for lower taxes, permanent tax cuts, and tax based incentives for things like savings. Paul would oppose all of these, favoring an elimination of the income tax with no replacement, essentially shutting the government down.

He's out of step on trade, an advocate of tariffs.

On no child left behind.

I don't know if he's a proponent of unions.

He's out of step with the Party's position on medicare and medicaid, investing in health and technological research, and womens health.

Not clear where he is when it comes to water standards or national parks, but these are the bottom of the platform issues, certainlay opposed to agriculture and urban development iniatives.

Won't bother with drugs.

My impression he's opposed to GWB's temporary worker program, as well as opposed to the Party on issues like internet pornography, promoting abstinance, adoption. Also minor issue.

All in all, Paul supports very few Republican positions, as his voting record bears out. Thats fine, and I acknowledge he's been elected as a Republican, but for his supporters to somehow attempt to redefine the Republican Party in the image on non-Republican on the issues Paul is the height of arrogance.

He's the poster boy RINO.

38 posted on 10/03/2007 12:58:18 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nashdiesel
I’d like to invite all conservatives to join the Ron Paul train. You’re still welcome here. Failure to do so equates to giving Hillary the White House.

They got the old steam engine repaired? Excellent.


39 posted on 10/03/2007 1:04:34 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
On no child left behind. He's out of step with the Party's position on medicare and medicaid, investing in health and technological research, and womens health.

This is supposed to be a bad thing?!?

40 posted on 10/03/2007 1:05:04 PM PDT by jmc813 (.) (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson