Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
Of course it goes without saying that if it was not for the sack of Constantinople by the Pope's crusade this battle would not have been necessary.

You're lying, of course, by hinting that the Pope had anything to do with the sack of Constantinople in 1204. Indeed, he condemned and lamented it in strong terms. Let's face it, the Greeks had been falling back since 1071 and if not for the Crusades, Constantinople might have fallen to the Turks much earlier than it finally did in 1453. And, I might add, when beseiged in1453, many of the stoutest defenders of the Constantinople were ... Latin Catholics from Venice, Genoa, and Spain.

So take your anti-Papal propaganda and stuff it.
29 posted on 10/10/2003 11:01:53 AM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus
Pope Innocent III later removed the ban that had excommunicated the so called Crusaders.
30 posted on 10/10/2003 5:14:29 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson