[NYer]

And what about the proposed definition of “sexual orientation”? According to Catholic-Legate, “It was reported that Beth Phinney, Liberal MP for Hamilton Mountain, was in a meeting with a constituent concerning the implications of C-250. Ms. Phinney was asked if the term ‘sexual orientation’ included heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, trisexual, bestiality, pedophilia, incest, polygamy, sadomasochism, etc? The constituent was quite disturbed when this Liberal MP confirmed that ‘all of these sexual behaviours would be included under the category of sexual orientation’.” Within the context of the Natural Law this strikes me more as a practical definition of sexual disorientation.

MAJOR PING

Scary? This is absolutely FRIGHTENING!

What is the government going to do? Ban the Bible from the country? How about the Catechism of the Catholic Church? Is the government going to start arresting Catholic priests who cite the Catechism in rejecting the homosexual lifestyle?”

Broad general question: How long did it take Canada to reach this level of degeneration?

[RobbyS]

Ms Phinney is at least honest. Senator Santorum was posing the very same question to American liberals. Instead of answering, they unloaded a stream of vituperation. But, of course, "sexual orientation" can be made to include all these perversions. As for Canada, I can see the day when it will be like the Soviet Union, where it is a crime to transport a Bible into Canada and they shut all the churches except for a token few for the use of Foreigners.

[Antoninus]

What would they think who literally gave their lives and limbs to establish Christianity in Canada? Pray to the and ask them to beseech the Holy Spirit to raise up a pious generation to turn back this rush toward wickedness in our neighbor to the north.


St. Charles Garnier


St. Jean Brebeuf


St. Isaac Jogues


St. Gabriel Lalemant

[Barnacle]

Coming to a country near you.