[sinkspur]

one here's gossip -and it is now becoming fairly apparent that's all this is- one should feel free to spread that gossip,

I first heard of Archbishop Myers' home on Bill O'Reilly's nationally-syndicated radio show, last Wednesday. He mentioned both Murphy's $1.2 million dollar mansion on Long Island and Myers' $600,000 house.

As you know, O'Reilly has never had to retract a story. This is not "gossip."

[Notwithstanding]

Oh stop pretending!

You can see we are not going to let you get out of the corner youhave painted for yourself without a sincere public apology.

You know Myers has a $600k residence.
Everything else is wild specualtion and gossip.

You are calumnous.

[sitetest]

Dear sinkspur,

The source here is Bill O'Reilly??

AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

This just gets better and better!!!

Well, sinkspur, your difficulty is that you know a bare fact, that Archbishop Myers may have bought/built a home for $650,000, or something like that.

Everything else that Mr. O'Reilly said, or that you've said, for that matter, is a projection of what's in him and what's in you. You have no idea what the money bought, why the acquisition was made, if it was justified or not, or anything else. You've taken a bare fact presented to you by a man who can barely present even bare facts accurately, and blown it up into some sort of evil thing.

Is it possible that the purchase/building of the house wasn't justified? Sure. But before you may justly say that against another person, you must present some facts that support your conclusion. It's even more likely that the action was completely justified, and unless you have evidence otherwise, you harm a good man's good name.

Wouldn't you call that calumny.

sitetest