To: Salvation
Salvation,
I have major problems with:
The same way He resurrected, that is how God is going to appear to you, to me, in that way, the same way as He resurrected, as an apparition.
Our Lord was raised physically, tangibly. He ate fish. and
specifically said," A spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see me have."
I smell false teaching, and I don't like to point fingers.
Paul (aka newberger)
To: newberger
I said I had my flame suit on.
Thanks for your feedback.
If you check at SpiritDaily, there is also a second part.
I will post it in a bit.
14 posted on
06/06/2003 5:41:53 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: newberger
This is an awkward translation (Maria Esperanza is living in Venezuela) and that (along with her husband having to vocalize her hardly audible words at this invalid stage) is the crux of the problem.
I don't think she means apparition as we use this term but I think she means the latin root, appearance, as her native tongue is Italian.
To: newberger
There's no contradiction in what's stated here: the seer indicates that Jesus will appear. So what?
WHEN He comes in glory, He will judge the living and the dead...but there's no bar to His appearance 'not in glory.'
26 posted on
06/06/2003 6:13:01 PM PDT by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: newberger
**I smell false teaching**
If this is church-sanctioned that usually means that the seer has been approved through witnesses and/or written testimony to the local bishop. And then that is all sent to the Vatican for approval.
Pinging NYer for verification on this.
53 posted on
06/06/2003 9:53:15 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson