[ultima ratio]

Neither you nor sitetest do anything but slander people. Where are the proofs for any of these accusations and slurs?

I am not a fan of Williamson's particular viewpoint--which is to the right of me--but he is not what you contend. You have consistently misrepresented his views--and that is nothing short of dishonest.

Nor is he the leader of a "cult", as you suggest--he is a leader in a traditionalist movement that has the Vatican falling over itself to reach some kind of rapprochement quickly.

Why? Because it knows the Society teaches nothing new, holds no radical views or doctrines, and is the living embodiment of its own Catholic past--relentlessly opposed by the modernist radicals now in power. This has proved a major embarrassment to Rome.

No, the real revolutionaries and cultists are the guys you pal around with--the gay bishops who endorse gay Masses, the lefty bishops who confuse political correctness with the Catholic faith, the same people who concocted a Lutheran Mass for Catholics.

I ask you--who's really more radical--a pope praying with witchdoctors and animists, or Bishop Williamson celebrating the old Mass?

[sinkspur]

I ask you--who's really more radical--a pope praying with witchdoctors and animists, or Bishop Williamson celebrating the old Mass?

The real choice is between the successor of St. Peter, who values every human being,and a wacky bishop, who cautions his dopey followers against praying with Novus Ordo Catholics, while he obsesses over women who wear shorts and pants.

Williamson's all you've got, in the line of episcopal succession, here in the United States.

Neither you nor sitetest do anything but slander people. Where are the proofs for any of these accusations and slurs?

Slanders and slurs? Read the goofy stuff Williamson writes; the only one doing the slurring is Dickie-boy.

[sitetest]

Dear ultima,

"Neither you nor sitetest do anything but slander people."

ROTFLMAO.

For myself, all I've done is quote the guy, and then offered my opinion about it.

I guess that's slander enough. All you have to do is read his trash, and you can figure it out on your own. And if you can't, it says more about you than even about Mr. Williamson. ;-)

As for picking bishops, our Holy Father is responsible for choosing more than 3000 bishops, worldwide. He has relied on his brother bishops from around the world to assist him. Unfortunately, time has shown that not all these brother bishops were worthy of his trust, and they didn't assist him as they should.

Yet, he could not have appointed scores or even hundreds of bishops per year without assistance.

Mr. Lefebvre only felt the need to defy God in consecrating four schismatic bishops. These were men he knew well, or should have known well. But in his choice of Mr. Williamson, he shows how easily he could be deceived by even one quite close to him. It is clear that the Holy Spirit was not with him in his decision to defy God and consecrate these rebel renegade bishops.


sitetest