Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ultima ratio
I ask you--who's really more radical--a pope praying with witchdoctors and animists, or Bishop Williamson celebrating the old Mass?

The real choice is between the successor of St. Peter, who values every human being,and a wacky bishop, who cautions his dopey followers against praying with Novus Ordo Catholics, while he obsesses over women who wear shorts and pants.

Williamson's all you've got, in the line of episcopal succession, here in the United States.

Neither you nor sitetest do anything but slander people. Where are the proofs for any of these accusations and slurs?

Slanders and slurs? Read the goofy stuff Williamson writes; the only one doing the slurring is Dickie-boy.

137 posted on 06/04/2003 5:33:57 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
I have read his letters--none of them goofy. If anyone is goofy, it's yourself, peddling this stuff. Yes, he mentioned the Unibomber's writings--but he put distance between himself and the man first, addressing only the writings, which were hostile to unbridled technological development. I am not a fan of this viewpoint--but it is not goofy. His views on women's dress are old-fashioned, but not worthy of the kinds of overwrought attacks you favor. The charges of Nazi sympathizing is the most serious attack of all--which you hurl freely, without consideration of the harm this does. This is culpable, and slanderous, motivated by sheer malice.
142 posted on 06/04/2003 5:40:54 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson