[bassmaner]

And you are another sanctimonious anti-Christian, looking down your nose, self righteous person who has bought the argument that somewhere in the Constitution is the right of men to have peverted sex with each other.

Not anti-Christian at all. I just find it ironic that this author supports sending people to prison - a place where "sodomy without consent" (i.e. homosexual rape) occurs all too frequently - because he doesn't like when they engage in "sodomy with consent" that's performed in private behind closed doors. And many of the sodomy laws on the books have nothing to do with homosexuality - in theory, married couples could be arrested for sodomy simply because they're caught performing an act that the ex-President often engaged in with interns.

Jesus Christ Himself said "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone". Jailing people for the sake of a private, consensual activity, is, IMHO, most certainly NOT a Christian act.

[Blood of Tyrants]

B.S. God destroyed a whole city because of their sodomy. Trying to imply that because Jesus didn't directly condemn homosexuality, he accepted it as normal is the typical pf people who twist the bible to suit their own ends.

And if they would keep it in their bedroom, no one would give a rat's @$$. Instead, they attempt to FORCE their abhorrent behavior on us as not just different but normal. The fudge packers go so far as to want us to believe that their perversion should be constitutionally protected.

Since they cannot win in the legislatures. this lawsuit is an attempt to establish that men having sex with men is a constitutionally protected act.