Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sheltonmac
One of the problems I've had with his style of evangelism is that results are measured in terms of how many people "came forward" at one of his crusades. It was as if the parable of the sower had no significance whatsoever.

Give the BGEA credit where it's due. They have kept statistics on the results of their "crusades" over the decades, and inform us that 4% of those who "make a decision for Christ" actually become active Christians. This would indicate that the "crusade evangelism" approach -- inducing conversions through various techniques of emotional manipulation -- has a 96% defect rate. People have some kind of experience induced by the event, which fails to last too far beyond the event that created the experience.

I have a personal conviction against responding to altar calls.

45 posted on 05/06/2003 6:13:41 AM PDT by TomSmedley ((technical writer looking for work!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: TomSmedley
"I have a personal conviction against responding to altar calls."

Especially since the gospel itself is all the invitation anyone ever needs. The danger of altar calls, in my opinon, is that the evangelist tends to take over the Holy Spirit's job of giving people the assurance of salvation. It would seem that many people leave these crusades with a false sense of security.

46 posted on 05/06/2003 6:32:22 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson