Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
Places like the FSSP and a couple of others whose names I can't recall right now. The FSSP has more applicants than they can take. But yes, when the SSPX situation is resolved they will be a source too. That's when, not if. As much as people like to malign them if it wasn't for them the Indult would not exist and the Traditional Mass would have been eradicated.
47 posted on 04/07/2003 2:21:30 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Places like the FSSP and a couple of others whose names I can't recall right now. The FSSP has more applicants than they can take.

And I think that's good.

But yes, when the SSPX situation is resolved they will be a source too. That's when, not if.

It's still an "if." As long as there are attitudes like we see here, that the NO is not a valid Mass, and must be eliminated, we will not have reconciliation.

As I said, I think that we should have both Masses, available for people to choose, and I would welcome the SSPX back. But they have to drop their attitude that they Church is not ultimately in charge of the liturgy.

As much as people like to malign them if it wasn't for them the Indult would not exist and the Traditional Mass would have been eradicated.

True.

SD

48 posted on 04/07/2003 2:27:16 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
As much as people like to malign them if it wasn't for them the Indult would not exist and the Traditional Mass would have been eradicated.

Having gotten what they wanted and fought for, why did they then separate themselves?

80 posted on 04/07/2003 8:07:07 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson