Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

God's Part and Man's Part in Salvation
John G. Reisinger ^ | John G. Reisinger

Posted on 02/08/2003 7:43:01 AM PST by Matchett-PI

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-698 next last
Yep! There really ARE only two religions in the world.

[1] The God-centered one where God is sovereign.

[2] The man-centered one where man is sovereign.

Biblical Christians (like Augustine, Luther and Calvin) believe God when he says fallen man is spiritually DEAD.

Professing Christians, (like Pelagius, Arminius, Wesley) DON'T believe God when he says fallen man is spiritually DEAD.

Eve didn't believe God when he told her she would DIE.

And the IDENTIFYING FACTOR that marks the false religion she started, is that same refusal to believe God when he says fallen man is spiritually DEAD.

1 posted on 02/08/2003 7:43:01 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; CCWoody; Jerry_M; Jean Chauvin; Wrigley; gdebrae; drstevej; EthanNorth; the_doc; ...
I'm preaching to the choir, here.

Please bump this to any you know who profess to be like the Bereans --- interested in *WHAT is right*, not just in *BEING right*.
2 posted on 02/08/2003 7:59:29 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; JHavard; Havoc; OLD REGGIE; Iowegian; TrueBeliever9; Prodigal Daughter; Zadokite; ...
Excellent article..

Flagged to regular posters

3 posted on 02/08/2003 8:22:20 AM PST by RnMomof7 (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Modern evangelism does the exact opposite and credits the opening of the heart to the power of man's "free will."

Sometimes, perhaps. But as one actively involved in an evangelistic movement, I can attest that there is a fair number of Calvinists and semi-Calvinists who recognize at least Prevenient Grace.

4 posted on 02/08/2003 8:33:50 AM PST by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; computerjunkie; SoothingDave; RnMomof7
Thanks for the links you sent from FRmail, Matchett. I'm very busy right now composing an answer to SoothingDave's statement that he made the other day. Unfortunately, I must actually back up and expose the underlying presumptions that he has with regards to the nature of the Expitiation before I can move forward and directly address what is wrong about his statement. Therefore, I'm wading throug a bunch of anathema declarations of his "Church" and I'm assembling information about their so called sacerdotal power. Sheesh, you never realize just how anti-Christian the RCC is until you start to read their declarations.
5 posted on 02/08/2003 9:13:38 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Interesting article. I'm going to spend some time chewing on this and thinking, because I think the author makes some good points, and I find this a slightly different view of the subject. I can see where many of the arguments that various of us have gotten into may have been avoided if we would have realized that we were looking at the same thing from two different vantage points. I had never really considered the idea that regeneration precedes repentance and faith, but I can see the concept.

As I look back on my own salvation experience, I can see the progression as it played out in my own heart. I can name the exact time and place where my heart was opened, and the event that opened it. Of all things, speaking to an exceptionally good rock guitarist after a concert, wanting to know how he had developed such an amazing talent. His one-word reply: Jesus. My life was never the same after that moment. You might have heard of this fellow, his name is Phil Keaggy, and he is even now a good friend of mine.

6 posted on 02/08/2003 12:14:07 PM PST by nobdysfool (No matter where you go, there you are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Excellent article! One of the best I've read. Thanks for the "ping!"
7 posted on 02/08/2003 12:23:09 PM PST by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; RnMomof7; xzins; Revelation 911; fortheDeclaration; P-Marlowe; winstonchurchill
The root error of the Arminian's gospel of freewill is its failure to see that man's part, repentance and faith, are the fruits and effects of God's work and not the essential ingredient's supplied by the sinner as "man's part of the deal."

While this may be taught in some Arminian churches (none that I've ever attended), the above statement is a misrepresentation of the gospel of Free Grace as taught by John Wesley:

First. It is free in all to whom it is given. It does not depend on any power or merit in man; no, not in any degree, neither in whole, nor in part. It does not in anywise depend either on the good works or righteousness of the receiver; not on anything he has done, or anything he is. It does not depend on his endeavors. It does not depend on his good tempers, or good desires, or good purposes and intentions; for all these flow from the free grace of God; they are the streams only, not the fountain. They are the fruits of free grace, and not the root. They are not the cause, but the effects of it. Whatsoever good is in man, or is done by man, God is the author and doer of it. Thus is his grace free in all; that is, no way depending on any power or merit in man, but on God alone, who freely gave us his own Son, and "with him freely giveth us all things.
John Wesley: Free Grace

No, we have neither proven freewill nor disproved election ... since it is impossible to do either.

We would probably all save ourselves a lot of time and grief if we remembered that in our discussions here.

8 posted on 02/08/2003 12:51:02 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24; RnMomof7; CCWoody; Jerry_M; Jean Chauvin; Wrigley; gdebrae; drstevej; ...
"..I can attest that there is a fair number of Calvinists and semi-Calvinists who recognize at least Prevenient Grace"

But Reisinger is talking about spiritually mature Christians.

Notice again what Reisinger wrote:

"I am NOT talking about, or trying to defend, "Calvinists" since they come in a hundred 'varieties. ...If you know anyone that denies the above facts, then that person, regardless of what he labels himself, is denying the clear message of the Bible."

9 posted on 02/08/2003 1:09:09 PM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Thank you Rn!
10 posted on 02/08/2003 1:11:02 PM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; RnMomof7; xzins; Wrigley; drstevej; CCWoody
Excellent post Corin. The problem is not Weslyanism or Calvinism per se. It is the overemphasis by some on either free will or on divine election that causes the contention. The Bible teaches both free will and divine election. To deny one or the other is to deny what the Bible clearly teaches. Our disgreements for the most part are in matters of minute degrees.
11 posted on 02/08/2003 1:12:33 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
You're welcome, Woody! Be sure and flag me when your composition is complete!
12 posted on 02/08/2003 1:13:00 PM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Matchett,

Thanks for the article and the link. That site is a wealth of other links, like a link to Luther's The Bondage of the Will, that you can't find in any so-called Christian Book store any more.

Best be careful before others start calling you a Calvinist Wacko (sob!!)

Regards,

CDL

13 posted on 02/08/2003 1:13:54 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (And i suppose Jesus spoke Elizabethian English too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
"I find this a slightly different view of the subject"

I thought it was an important article because it clearly shows the difference between Biblical Christianity, Hyper-Calvinism, and Arminianism.

The name Phil Keaggy does sound familiar. If I heard any of his music I would know. I'm a big fan of Eric Clapton's music (but not him, personally).

14 posted on 02/08/2003 1:18:58 PM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
You're welcome!

I don't worry what some may call me. All opinions don't carry equal weight.

Especially the opinions of light weights who embrace the other religion (the feminized one). :D
15 posted on 02/08/2003 1:25:17 PM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Hey, no problem. At the rate I'm going, it will be pretty big.

But, now is the time to get my mutt of a pup out of the back yard (where she is being irritated by snowflakes as they tickle her wiskers) and let her run off some energy with some retriever dummy training.

Woody.

P.S. I'd tell you to check your regular email, but it seems as if your mail box is full. So, you either need to clean your house, or tell me where you have moved. hehehe!
16 posted on 02/08/2003 2:03:56 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...

Salvation

(Greek soteria; Hebrew yeshu'ah).

Salvation has in Scriptural language the general meaning of liberation from straitened circumstances or from other evils, and of a translation into a state of freedom and security (I Kings, xi, 13; xiv, 45; II Kings, xxiii, 10; IV Kings, xiii, 17). At times it expresses God's help against Israel's enemies, at other times, the Divine blessing bestowed on the produce of the soil (Is., xlv, 8). As sin is the greatest evil, being the root and source of all evil, Sacred Scripture uses the word "salvation" mainly in the sense of liberation of the human race or of individual man from sin and its consequences. We shall first consider the salvation of the human race, and then salvation as it is verified in the individual man.

II. INDIVIDUAL SALVATION

The Council of Trent describes the process of salvation from sin in the case of an adult with great minuteness (Sess. VI, v-vi).

It begins with the grace of God which touches a sinner's heart, and calls him to repentance. This grace cannot be merited; it proceeds solely from the love and mercy of God. Man may receive or reject this inspiration of God, he may turn to God or remain in sin. Grace does not constrain man's free will.

Thus assisted the sinner is disposed for salvation from sin; he believes in the revelation and promises of God, he fears God's justice, hopes in his mercy, trusts that God will be merciful to him for Christ's sake, begins to love God as the source of all justice, hates and detests his sins.

This disposition is followed by justification itself, which consists not in the mere remission of sins, but in the sanctification and renewal of the inner man by the voluntary reception of God's grace and gifts, whence a man becomes just instead of unjust, a friend instead of a foe and so an heir according to hope of eternal life. This change happens either by reason of a perfect act of charity elicited by a well disposed sinner or by virtue of the Sacrament either of Baptism or of Penance according to the condition of the respective subject laden with sin. The Council further indicates the causes of this change. By the merit of the Most Holy Passion through the Holy Spirit, the charity of God is shed abroad in the hearts of those who are justified.

17 posted on 02/08/2003 2:04:17 PM PST by NYer (Kyrie Eleison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24
The problem Jude is that Prevenient Grace is little more that a general "keeping "grace. .Mans will is stronger than that grace..so it does not resolve the problem does it?
18 posted on 02/08/2003 2:17:29 PM PST by RnMomof7 (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Still waiting for an answer on that other thread NY..If a Catholic intentionally refuses to go to mass can they go to heaven? I will look there for your answer
19 posted on 02/08/2003 2:22:02 PM PST by RnMomof7 (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
To deny one or the other is to deny what the Bible clearly teaches. Our disgreements for the most part are in matters of minute degrees.

Calvinists are consistant in never denying mans free will...we just think that man will never" will "to have Jesus as Savior and LORD without a new heart..

It is not a matter of salvation...but I would also not call it a small matter because it has to do with the sovereignity of God...

20 posted on 02/08/2003 2:28:01 PM PST by RnMomof7 (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-698 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson