[Aquinasfan]

Our assumptions about history and scripture are not the same. I think we need to agree to disagree about these few issues and unite to fight our common enemy. We could end abortion in this country if we would just work together.

But why not do both? When I had time I was on the board of a non-denominational crisis pregnancy center. Indeed, we can do both. And both are important. In fact, both are matters of life and death. In fact, it can be argued that matters of "spiritual death" are more important:

Matthew 10:28

Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.

Doctrine is important. A simple example: Is baptism necessary for salvation?

However, our arguments or discussions should always be marked by charity.

1 Corinthians 13

1If I speak in the tongues[1] of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.

I've read your posts and they are always marked by charity and meekness. I know that argumentation can be tedious and exhausting, but:

1 Peter 3:15

Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect...

[ACAC]

If we can debate in the way that you suggested, then I could agree with you. It just seems that many debates that begin well end badly. I am actually undecided on the question of baptism being necessary for salvation. I was raised Baptist and was taught it was not necessary for salvation, although it was also taught that it was very important. Now I am Lutheran as a compromise with my wife who was raised Catholic. Lutherans believe that it is necessary unless you come to a saving faith in Jesus and then die before you have a chance to be baptized.