Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Twenty Mysteries of the Rosary?
Seattle Catholic ^ | November 8, 2002 | John Vennari

Posted on 11/09/2002 9:56:20 PM PST by ultima ratio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-238 next last
To: Catholicguy
This was defined by Pope Leo XIII. But so many other teachings of Pope Leo were overturned by Vatican II, why not this one also?
<> Name a single one "over-turned" by Vatican Two. Document. <>

Here is one example from Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Immortale Dei "On the Christian Constitution of States"

6. As a consequence, the State, constituted as it is, is clearly bound to act up to the manifold and weighty duties linking it to God, by the public profession of religion. Nature and reason, which command every individual devoutly to worship God in holiness, because we belong to Him and must return to Him, since from Him we came, bind also the civil community by a like law. For, men living together in society are under the power of God no less than individuals are, and society, no less than individuals, owes gratitude to God who gave it being and maintains it and whose everbounteous goodness enriches it with countless blessings. Since, then, no one is allowed to be remiss in the service due to God, and since the chief duty of all men is to cling to religion in both its teaching and practice-not such religion as they may have a preference for, but the religion which God enjoins, and which certain and most clear marks show to be the only one true religion -- it is a public crime to act as though there were no God. So, too, is it a sin for the State not to have care for religion as a something beyond its scope, or as of no practical benefit; or out of many forms of religion to adopt that one which chimes in with the fancy; for we are bound absolutely to worship God in that way which He has shown to be His will.

121 posted on 11/11/2002 1:23:53 PM PST by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Look, nobody denies gradual change is inevitable. But revolution is out of the question. The Catholic Church emerged from the collapse of the Roman Empire virtually unchanged. Ditto from the French Revolution. Radical change in the world at large should be no pretext for radical change in the life of the Church.

The Protestant Reformation was different. It began as an attempt at revolution from within, but ended up as heresy. The Church rejected the assault from within and reaffirmed its Catholic identity. Now we face a similar assault--a complete seismic shift away from the deposit of faith to a new heretical religion more attuned to the Protestant theological perspective. This is what is totally unacceptable and must once more be rejected.

Notice how the modernists go about it. Not by an open denial of the faith, but by a subtle undermining of basic Catholic doctrines and rituals. No new doctrine has ever been expressly declared, though many outrageous trial balloons have been floated, but the Catholic perspective is still being systematically erased. This is because essential dogmas go untaught to the younger generation. They are being deliberately suppressed and ignored.

Here is one example. The Real Presence is not a dogma that is much mentioned. If modernists truly believed that Christ were present on the altar, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, after the words of Consecration--would they have removed all acknowledgment of the immensity of this fact? Would they have insisted, under one pretext or another, on removing references to this enormous truth in the text or in the rubrics of the New Mass, erasing all but one genuflection by the priest and even now prohibiting kneeling before communion? They do this in violation of Catholic yearnings to express devotion and adoration, and in violation of all Catholic tradition.

This can only be explained by modernist disbelief in the Catholic theological perspective. Loss of faith explains why the focus is on the assemblage and on Christ's virtual presence only in their midst, rather than on Christ's Real Presence offered as a sacrifice to the Father. Disbelief in the Catholic perspective also explains the casualness of communion in the hands and the shunting aside of the tabernacle and so much else. Christ is not actually present to these men, so they show this by what they do and decree.

This change in the way Catholics pray together at the Mass, together with hundreds of other changes, from a newly liberalized moral theology to the ripping-out of communion rails, has created a crisis in the Church and in the Catholic community. Very little now separates Catholics from Protestants. A whole generation of young people no longer believes in many of the doctrines once thought to be what essentially defined a Catholic--which seems not at all to bother the Vatican. It continues to push the envelope and to institute its many radical changes. So this is where we stand today. The new religion, more in keeping with mainline Protestantism, is being gradually imposed and the old faith is being gradually rejected.
122 posted on 11/11/2002 6:03:17 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Thank you ultima for your response. I thought your response made a pretty well-reasoned argument for the most part until I reached the following statements:
Very little now separates Catholics from Protestants. A whole generation of young people no longer believes in many of the doctrines once thought to be what essentially defined a Catholic--which seems not at all to bother the Vatican.

As far as I know, this "crisis" has largely been "limited" the "Roman rite" church, and not the "Eastern" rites of the Catholic church (I could be wrong). So you cannot say that conclusively. Also, it seems from my observations of your posts that you seem to be an enthusiast of the "pre-Vatican II" Church. But even this Church hasn't been everlasting. The Tridentine Mass was set in its "current" form at the Council of Trent (hence the name). The liturgies of the Eastern rites (the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom et al) are much older in their current forms than the Tridentine Mass. Do you doubt the validity and tradition of these rites?

I think one major problem here is that a blanket statement is being applied to all Catholics, and in particular, young Catholics (of which I am one). I think the miracle of this situation is that even with all that you have described, there are scores of young people who seek the Truth out, of our faith and our tradition. As much as the "crisis" has "liberalized moral theology" and "ripped-out communion rails," there are young people who are being divinely inspired to seek the Truth out. Many teachings have been left out of the religious education of these young people, yet the seek the Truth out. Why is that?

I think it is because of the individual nature of our Catholic faith. As much as Catholicism is a communal experience (the Mass, our religious upbringing, etc.), we still hear God "calling each one of us by name." While our parents, our extended family, and our Church teach us the tenets of our faith, it is nothing until we hear the call of God ourselves and respond by making the faith our own. This requires a conversion of the heart.

Yes, there might possibly be a revolution going on the Church at this moment. But it is probably MORE due to the inaction of many, than the actions of very few. If these things are supposedly happening because of Vatican II and the actions of the Holy See, there probably wouldn't be in as much of a problem. No, we are at this point, in my opinion, because we let the secular rule too much of our civilization, and as a result, opportunists ("liberation" theory theologians, leftists, peverts, et al) saw their chance to corrupt the Church when the Council met and in its wake, and make up their own rules as they saw fit. In response, too many of us have been complacent, and not have done our best to teach our offspring what Catholics believe. As Burke also said, "They only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." The Church has survived through far worse times. What we can do without is the corrupt intentions of the opportunists and the rantings from all sides, and trust in God. My "mottos" are the following:
Ex fide et ratione, Dominus(in other words, you will find the Lord through faith and reason, which is the "legacy" of St. Thomas Aquinas) and Vive Jesus (Live Jesus, a command)

123 posted on 11/11/2002 10:07:06 PM PST by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona; Siobhan; Catholicguy; Bud McDuell; sandyeggo; BlackElk; Loyalist; Aquinasfan; ...
Any takers in response to posts #122 and 123? (read #118 as well to see the origin of this part of the discussion)
124 posted on 11/11/2002 10:10:35 PM PST by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
But even this Church hasn't been everlasting.

Oops, there is a language problem here. This should say "But even the Church in this form hasn't been everlasting." The Church was founded by Christ almost 2,000 years ago, and it was, is, and will be everlasting.

125 posted on 11/11/2002 10:17:40 PM PST by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Let me answer you point by point. Of course I don't doubt the validity of any of the eastern rites. There has never been any question that the Orthodox have a validly ordained priesthood. Their bishops are validly consecrated since they are in the line of apostolic succession, just as ours are. In turn, the priests they ordain are validly ordained. Their Masses therefore are also valid.

As for the Tridendine Mass, Pius V only codified the Mass at the Council of Trent. It had already been in existence for at least a thousand years before that, its Canon having been fixed as far back as the fifth century. Some of its prayers, in fact, go back to the apostolic age--the Kyrie, for instance. That is one of the great comforts and joys of attending such a Mass--one is carried back in time to the early Church at the time of the Roman Empire. Most Catholics don't realize this. The term "Tridentine" itself is a deliberate misnomer. It is called this by modern liturgists to devalue its antiquity and to suggest it only goes back four hundred years. But in truth it is very much older than this, the Tridentine Council having only codified it at that time.

The rest of your post was beautiful. God seems to be speaking to you indeed, when you express that kind of attraction to the truth.
126 posted on 11/11/2002 10:40:23 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
My mention of the Orthodox was not meant to exclude the eastern rites of the Catholic Church. All are valid and ancient. Regarding the protestantization of Catholic youth--a Gallup poll ten years ago found that two out of three Catholics no longer believe in the Real Presence. There can be no doubt this has been because of the institution of the Novus Ordo Mass.
127 posted on 11/11/2002 10:55:51 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio; Desdemona; Siobhan; Catholicguy; Bud McDuell; sandyeggo; BlackElk; Loyalist; ...
Thank you for answering me so quickly. I'm going to double check on your answer about the Tridentine name, but it seems that you're right, if I remember correctly.

I am a witness to both the Truth, and the Truth's effect on young people. When I mentioned young people seeking out the Truth, I was speaking out of personal experience. I've seen the curiousity within my peers sparked on many different occasions, even within the "modernist" environment we worship in. I think a lot of this can be credited to one of both of two things: a strong faith background and/or upbringing; and/or a conversion experience in their life (whether it was a literal conversion from another faith to Catholicism or divine intervention in their life). One thing to remember is that the development of a individual's faith is a constant experience.

I'm one whose had both of the experiences mentioned above. My mother is a devout Catholic, whose mother studied at one time to be a nun, and was originally from Poland. My father is a naturalized American citizen originally from the Phillipines. So on both sides of my family, I have a strong culturally Catholic heritage. I grew up being taught the traditional prayers by my parents, and going to Mass every Sunday. I received twelve years of Catholic education, most of which was on a pretty traditionalist line. As I mentioned in pst #118, it was in grade school where I was immersed in the Lenten and other yearly traditions of my parish. I was also an altar boy from fourth grade until twelfth grade. I was also occasionally a lector.

Within this soil, my faith was planted. But it was sunlight and the cleansing waters of a conversion experience that sprouted my faith. I had a pretty rough junior year in high school. I was doing poorly academically and my relationship with my father was strained. My experiences that year made me feel like I had a really low self-worth. Even though I could never think or attempt of suicide, it felt like my life was pretty meaningless and worthless. But during Advent of that year, I went on an annual religious retreat that took place at a Norbertine abbey and retreat center. It was a definitely healing experience. I "rediscovered" God's Love for me. The whole experience helped me let go, and let God take things into His hands. However, it was only the first step of my journey.

In the meantime since then, like every almost every human being, I've done some very stupid and sinful things. Another thing that persisted even after the retreat was my mediocre prayer life. I didn't really talk to God, formally or informally, that much. Earlier this year, I discovered the Divine Mercy devotion. Now, I don't know what your opinion may be of the devotion itself, but the message itself is simple and completely consistant with our Catholic faith: our God is a merciful God, and that He desires that we ask for His mercy, that we be merciful towards others, and that we put our complete trust in Jesus. While I have gotten the part about asking God for mercy down pretty well, the other two I am still working on, and I will probably be working on them for the rest of my life. But my discovery of the Divine Mercy message and devotion has caused a slow but steady change in not only my prayer life, but in my heart. Now, I pray the Rosary and Divine Mercy chaplet almost every day and have tried to go to Daily Mass (when I get to bed early and haul my lazy bones out of bed in the morning).

I am trying harder to establish a better prayer life, and at the same time, trying to turn from my more sinful ways. It's been hard, butt as a saying that I heard goes, "They never said it would be easy, but it's going to be worth it." My spirituality has picked up many things along the way in my relatively short life (it's Salesian character in particular), but I am certain that God has a plan for me. All I have to do is to put my complete trust in Him. I can't do this alone. The prayers of my brother and sisters in Christ help me to stay the course on my journey. I ask all of you to pray for me, and to pray for each other, that God's mercy and healing/saving power be upon us and on the whole world.

(PS - As you may have picked up here and on another thread, I have a fascination with the Eastern Rites of the Catholic Church, in particular the Byzantine rites. This interest was sparked again recently by programs I viewed on EWTN -they actually aired a Ruthenian Divine Liturgy on the 8th I believe. I think I'm going to take a look into this tradition to see if it's for me.)
(PPS - For those who didn't read the thread, read the posts on the entire thread for the progression of the discussion, in particular the last several posts.)

128 posted on 11/11/2002 11:35:10 PM PST by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Thanks for your clarification.

Regarding the protestantization of Catholic youth--a Gallup poll ten years ago found that two out of three Catholics no longer believe in the Real Presence. There can be no doubt this has been because of the institution of the Novus Ordo Mass.

That probably is a factor. But I think the lack of parental involvement in children's education can also play a bigger role in this. I think many parents don't care what religious beliefs their offspring have. This is a sad development for our faith community, and has a devastating impact on the lives of countless young people. This is a large factor in the growth immorality that is found in the youth culture of our time. Even those with a faith background can get caught up in it (I sure did). At the same time however, there are the young people like the ones I have mentioned. What we are called to do is to minister to such young people, and to raise our children properly in the teachings of Catholicism.

129 posted on 11/11/2002 11:44:37 PM PST by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian; ultima ratio; sitetest
I know there are communities in other parts of the US. St. Mary's Oratory is canonically established, as an oratory, as of this year by Bishop Doran. I do not understand the technicalities but I believe this amounts to a permanent guarantee for the Tridentine community here. Our pastor is of the Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priest. That order is Tridentine only. It has at least one church in Wisconsin. There is a Benedictine Tridentine Abbey, I believe in Eastern Oklahoma at Clear Creek, or possibly the Southern Ozaek region of Missouri. There are other orders and locations as well. Having lived through the original liturgical revolution and having the Tridentine Mass ripped away abruptly by the red armband brigade led by Archbishop Bugnini, having almost joined the Russian Orthodox Church in disgust over the the festival of outrages that were perpetrated from 1958 to 1978, I've paid my dues. Fortunately I can thank one very elderly, hard-core Connecticut priest for verbally slapping me around and keeping me in the Roiman Catholic Church otherwise I might spend my life carping and complaining in the wilderness too.

We have raised our children Catholic by homeschooling them for years and then working with other Catholic homeschoolers in the development of our own schools. This is also not unique. They don't watch network TV or sitcoms. They don't hang out at malls. They don't have unaccounted for free time to do what they please or what others please. We take a very serious interest in their friends and associates. They have plenty of "socialization," plenty of classical education, languages ancient and modern, good literature, Saxon Math. It costs us luxuries that others may take for granted but our kids are more important than material goods. We moved from the Northeast to the Rockford area specifically because of the then St. Mary's Shrine and because of Bishop Doran. Our bishop grew up in Rockford, attended the cathedral church of that time at which he served Mass, was ordained for Rockford, succeeded a quite liberal bishop Arthur O'Neill who is still alive and active but seems supportive of Bishop Doran. If we rearrange our lives for the appropriate exercise of our responsibilities as parents, we have much less to fear.

Why would we not move? Under a relative liberal archbishop John Whealon, we were treated quite well in the Hartford Archdiocese. He did not drag his feet on the Tridentine Mass. We had to locate our Mass at a very old and not well-maintained large church in a shooting gallery neighborhood. Murders occurred in the adjacent street during Mass, once when Archbishop Whealon was in attendance at a Tridentine Mass. No one of the Tridentine Mass community was assaulted or injured in that neighborhood. The non-Catholic neighbors were, if anything, protective of the largely white, middle class attendees at that Sunday afternoon Mass. We were married in a Tridentine wedding, partly because we asked politely and expressed our understanding that it might not be possible or politic for him to allow it and that we would understand if the answer was no. Sometimes our folks forget the little things like common courtesy and not just toward the pope.

People can move to Rockford. The housing is quite reasonably priced. People do not have to move to Rockford. This Church of ours was surviving barely in the catacombs not long after it was founded and for most of 300 years, with an astonishing amount of martyrdom. We are in a lot of trouble if our future rests on people who throw up their hands and wonder how can ANYONE bring their kids up Catholic in our day and age. Government offers us divorce on demand. For the most part, we say no thanks. Government offers us "schools" to pervert our children. Again we say no. Corrupt people within the Church offer us bad Catholic schools that ape the worst of the government indoctrination centers. We tried that for a year and a half in a parish with a wonderfully orthodox pastor who was handling a parish with minor assistance from an aged and half-crippled priest in an affluent parish (we are not affluent) which used to have five priests. We then joined the ranks of those who say no when we had to deal with our eldest daughter being taught five times in one year that Jesus Christ did not really know He was God, even on the Cross. We turned to homeschooling. In addition to our own respective salvations, what have we as a more important priority than our kids and their salvations?

Bellyaching is no substitute for acting on what we believe. Catholics in Red China have it worse than we do. Catholic students at Notre Dame have it worse than we do. Catholics living in grinding poverty in Latin America and Africa, inter alia, have it worse than we do. Before we go around telling the pope how we demand that he run the Church, it would behoove us to "light one little candle" in our own homes and then in our neighborhoods and among our friends and then in organizations like the Knights of Columbus and rebuiold our lost and beloved 1950s Catholic culture step by step, institution by institution, create schools of OUR OWN, credit unions of our own, tutoring activity of our own, etc. The much derided Vatican II told us that we, not the priests, had the responsibility to bring Catholic Witness to the secular world of politics and government. We can do that. We should, as someone claimed Mother Teresa said, smile at our wives and children and we ought to be able to do so free of claims that, unless we grab lapels, we are nothing more than hapless grinning idiots.

To those who do not want to be actively involved with the Church because they think they are just too, too pure to sully themselves by contact with all those "Modernists" who attend Novus Ordo churches, fine, do it your way. Do not tell us. Show us the results of your concrete work (not the postings on the internet but the actual hard work) and how superior those results are and you'll get a real hearing. Meanwhile, as the old saying goes, talk is cheap action speaks louder than words.

Pope-bashing is verbal. Building orthodox Catholic schools is not verbal. Restoring an old Church to be suitable for Tridentine Masses once again (we have had to restore all of the stained-glass windows in our 1885 Church and the roof, ceiling and water damaged walls are next. We already did the furnace.)

Latin Mass magazine used to have a sister magazine called Sursum Corda, devoted not to moaning and groaning but to all of the wonderful things that are still being done by Catholics whether Tridentine or Novus Ordo. Facilities in New York for serving the terminally ill cancer patients, prison ministries such as that of a lifer who converts fellow prisoners to the Faith, the stories of converts to our faith who used to be Protestant clergy, and many, many other wonderful things leading the Missouri Synod Lutheran photographer of the New York cancer facility (founded by Nathaniel Hawthorne's daughter) story to say that he hoped eventually to die of cancer and to be so fortunate as to die there.

To those who are not Catholic on this non-sectarian site, we must often look like a pack of whining, squabbling infant malcontents, especially with the craven river of criticisms aimed at Pope John Paul II. If the woman who works for Latin Mass magazine is no closer than three hours from the nearest Tridentine Mass, she ought to consider moving. There are pages of Latin Mass listings from Una Voce listed in her magazine. That list was our starting point.

Sitetest claims that ultima ratio was going to a Tridentine Mass recognized by the Church but found something to justify not attending any more in favor, apparently, of a Mass not recognized. A lot of this stuff is offended taste. The Faith is intact. Many hate it and its pope from all sides. Were that not true, we should have to recheck our premises.

130 posted on 11/11/2002 11:57:45 PM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Bud McDuell
I've been ignoring you but, OK, now you have my attention. What is YOUR constructive plan? Whine, moan and groan? Bash the pope? If the Church has imperfections, it isn't good enough for your rarified sensibilities?

By the way, are you jealous of someone who has such a solid bishop as Sean O'Malley? You probably ought to be. Isn't Bishop O'Malley in Fall River, Massachusetts not Palm Beach, Florida? What's the matter with O'Malley? Does he keep too civil a tongue in his head for your exclusive tastes and sensibilities, particularly in regard to Pope John Paul II?

131 posted on 11/12/2002 12:08:16 AM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
<> So, does that mean you think an Ecumenical Council changed and/or repudiated Doctrine, or, do you think it the case there was a development of Doctrine?<>
132 posted on 11/12/2002 4:49:43 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
<> You go to the same Parish as Thomas Fleming, correct? "Chronicles of Culture" is one of my favorite periodicals.<>
133 posted on 11/12/2002 4:55:24 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
<> He used to be in Fall River. Now, he is the Bishop of Palm Beach County, FL, where all the Catholics are handsome/beautiful, bright and faithful.<>
134 posted on 11/12/2002 4:57:51 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
I get weak-kneed reading your beautiful posts. Thanks for them.

135 posted on 11/12/2002 5:03:05 AM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
<> Thanks for your great posts. It is heartening to hear from one such as yourself. In my little area of Florida, we have both the Maronites and the Ruthenians. I have been to both of their DL's in the past and while I am partial to the Maronites, I can understand your attraction to the Ruthenians.

For what it is worth, I thought about changing Rites, but concluded God wanted me to grow where he placed me - in the Latin Rite.

I did use to have fun pointing out to our Orthodox brethern the Ruthenianas used the Filioque - but that is a matter for another post:)<>

136 posted on 11/12/2002 5:03:33 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Well, Palm Beach's gain is Fall River's loss. If Bishop O'Malley leaves Palm Beach, it will be for a promotion and not for the reason that the last two departed. I bet the folks in Palm Beach will feel as enthusiastic about O'Malley as we in Rockford feel about Bishop Doran. Now you have a bishop as handsome, bright, and faithful as the best Catholics of Palm Beach. Enjoy!
137 posted on 11/12/2002 5:11:12 AM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Yes, Tom and his family belong to St. Mary's as does Scott Richert.
138 posted on 11/12/2002 5:12:53 AM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
I hope you won't need a walker but thanks for your kindness.
139 posted on 11/12/2002 5:14:30 AM PST by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; Catholicguy
I know there are communities in other parts of the US.

Yes there are, and since this has become the recruitment part of the thread, I would invite those interested to come to Colorado Springs, Co. where they can become members of Immaculate Conception, a full service Latin mass parish. Yes, daily mass, daily confession, and two, yes two Sunday masses. Our FSSP priest offers Latin classes and a discourse on the Summa Theologica on a weekly basis. It is growing and is made up of many young families who are actively homeschooling the many children they have fearlessly brought into the world. No need to address the attributes of living in the shadow of Pike's Peak; I'm certain that the climate is more amenable than Rockford, but as for beautiful people I might have to defer to Palm Beach.

It's heartening to know that other gruntled Catholics are out there. Semper Fidelis.

140 posted on 11/12/2002 6:02:25 AM PST by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson