Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burial Box of St. James (A Catholic Perspective)
Catholic Answers ^ | Oct 22, 2002 | James Akin

Posted on 10/26/2002 1:59:09 PM PDT by polemikos

In October 2002 it was announced in Biblical Archaeology Review that a first century stone ossuary had been discovered that is believed to have held the bones of St. James, the brother of Jesus, also known as "James the Just."

An ossuary is a box used to hold the bones of a dead person. Stone ossuaries were widely used by Palestinian Jews between 20 B.C. and A.D. 70.

This ossuary bore the inscription "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus." It had been bought a number of years previously by a Jewish collector who prefers to remain anonymous. He did not initially realize its potential significance until he asked Andre Lemaire of the Sorbonne, a paleographer or expert in ancient writing, to translate the Aramaic inscription on the ossuary.

James, Joseph, and Jesus were very common names in first century Palestine, and Lemaire estimates that there may have been as many as twenty individuals in Jerusalem who were named James and who had fathers named Joseph and brothers names Jesus. Nevertheless, Lemaire and other experts believe it probable that the James to whom this ossuary belonged very probably was the one referred to in the New Testament as "the brother of the Lord" (Gal. 1:19).

It is extremely uncommon for brothers to be named in ossuary inscriptions. Of the hundreds of such ossuaries that have been found, only two name a brother as well as the father. The fact that this one does so suggests that the brother was considered very important. It is unlikely that there were other men named James who had fathers named Joseph and who had brothers named Jesus that were so important that they warranted mention on an ossuary.

Following the announcement of the discovery, many were quick to ask its potential apologetic significance. If authentic, its immediate significance is that it provides the earliest known inscriptional evidence for the historical reality of Jesus, as well as providing confirmation of two of his family relationships. Previously the only first century data on Jesus and his family has come from literary sources, such as the documents of the New Testament and (with important qualifications) from the first century Jewish historian Josephus.

Some non-Catholics were quick to tout the box as evidence against the perpetual virginity of Mary, however this does not follow. The ossuary identifies its James as the son of Joseph and the brother of Jesus, it does not identify him as the son-much less the biological son-of Mary. The only point that Catholic doctrine has established regarding the "brethren of the Lord" is that they are not biological children of Mary.

What relationship they did have with her is a matter of speculation. They may have been Jesus' adoptive brothers, stepbrothers through Joseph, or-according to one popular theory-cousins. As has often been pointed out, Aramaic had no word for "cousin," and so the word for brother was used in its place. This inscription is in Aramaic, and so there would be little surprise if it were being used in that way.

While the inscription does not establish the brethren of the Lord as biological children of Mary, it does have an impact on which theory may best explain the relationship of the brethren to Jesus. If James "the brother of the Lord" were Jesus' cousin then it would be unlikely for him also to have a father named Joseph. This would diminish the probability of the cousin theory in favor of the idea that this James was a stepbrother or an adoptive brother of Jesus.

The stepbrother hypothesis is, in fact, the earliest one on record. It is endorsed by a document known as the Protoevangelium of James, which dates to the year 120, within sixty years of James' death (James died in A.D. 62). According to the Protoevangelium, Joseph was an elderly widower at the time he was betrothed to Mary. He already had a family and thus was willing to become the guardian of a virgin consecrated to God. The stepbrother hypothesis was the most common explanation of the brethren of the Lord until St. Jerome popularized the cousin hypothesis just before the year 400.

The stepbrother hypothesis is also supported by the fact that Joseph apparently was significantly older than Mary, as he appears to have died before our Lord's public ministry began.

Bottom line: If the ossuary of James bar-Joseph is that of James the brother of the Lord, it sheds light on which of the theories Catholics are permitted to hold is most likely the correct one, but it poses does nothing to refute Catholic doctrine. If authentic, as seems probable, it is to be welcomed as further archaeological confirmation of the life of our Lord.

Addendum: The Life of James the Just
by St. Jerome

James, who is called the brother of the Lord, surnamed the Just, the son of Joseph by another wife (as some think, but, as appears to me, the son of Mary sister of the mother of our Lord of whom John makes mention in his book), after our Lord's passion at once ordained by the apostles bishop of Jerusalem, wrote a single epistle, which is reckoned among the seven Catholic Epistles and even this is claimed by some to have been published by some one else under his name, and gradually, as time went on, to have gained authority.

Hegesippus [the second century historian] who lived near the apostolic age, in the fifth book of his Commentaries, writing of James. says

"After the apostles, James the brother of the Lord surnamed the Just was made head of the Church at Jerusalem. Many indeed are called James. This one was holy from his mother's womb. He drank neither wine nor strong drink, ate no flesh, never shaved or anointed himself with ointment or bathed. He alone had the privilege of entering the Holy of Holies, since indeed he did not use woolen vestments but linen and went alone into the temple and prayed in behalf of the people, insomuch that his knees were reputed to have acquired the hardness of camels' knees."

He says also many other things, too numerous to mention. Josephus also in the 20th book of his Antiquities, and Clement in the 7th of his Outlines mention that on the death of Fetus who reigned over Judea, Albinus was sent by Nero as his successor.

Before he had reached his province, Ananias the high priest, the youthful son of Ananus of the priestly class taking advantage of the state of anarchy, assembled a council and publicly tried to force James to deny that Christ is the son of God. When he refused Ananius ordered him to be stoned. Cast down from a pinnacle of the temple, his legs broken, but still half alive, raising his hands to heaven he said, "Lord forgive them for they know not what they do." Then struck on the head by the club of a fuller such a club as fullers are accustomed to wring out garments with-he died.

This same Josephus records the tradition that this James was of so great sanctity and reputation among the people that the downfall of Jerusalem was believed to be on account of his death. He it is of whom the apostle Paul writes to the Galatians that "No one else of the apostles did I see except James the brother of the Lord" [Gal. 1:19], and shortly after the event the Acts of the apostles bear witness to the matter.

The Gospel also which is called the Gospel according to the Hebrews, and which I have recently translated into Greek and Latin and which also Origen often makes use of, after the account of the resurrection of the Saviour says, "but the Lord, after he had given his grave clothes to the servant of the priest, appeared to James (for James had sworn that he would not eat bread from that hour in which he drank the cup of the Lord until he should see him rising again from among those that sleep)" and again, a little later, it says "'Bring a table and bread,' said the Lord." And immediately it is added, "He brought bread and blessed and brake and gave to James the Just and said to him, 'My brother eat thy bread, for the son of man is risen from among those that sleep.'"

And so he ruled the Church of Jerusalem thirty years, that is until the seventh year of Nero, and was buried near the temple from which he had been cast down. His tombstone with its inscription was well known until the siege of Titus and the end of Hadrian's reign. Some of our writers think he was buried in Mount Olivet, but they are mistaken.

--St. Jerome, On Illustrious Men 2

See also: Brethren of the Lord and Mary Ever Virgin


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events; Ecumenism; History
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; james; jesus; joseph; ossuary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last
To: Irisshlass
No, it implies that we will no longer need to "hold fast", as our faith shall be turned to seeing- and we shall be perfected, so that even if we did not see, our faith would be so strong that there would be no need to "hold fast": for we could not let go!
41 posted on 10/27/2002 11:50:46 AM PST by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Did Mary sit on the Mercy seat and judge the people?Is that where she sat to talk to the people of Israel? It is blasphmy...and again not to the point..Do you believe like the Mormons that God had sex with Mary and she became his wife for eternity? Why would God have made her guilty of bigamy ?

Do you have to make her a god to justify her life, her holiness or purpose?

I'm not making her into a God...you are...I would suggest reading the OT on the Ark of the Convenant...

The Ark was a visible sign of God's presence and protection...Mary was a visible sign of God's presence..Our Sacarments, Eurcharist are visible signs..
42 posted on 10/27/2002 12:01:09 PM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Jesus is her firstborn son because that is important if you are a Jew. The firstborn son must be taken to the Temple et cetera even if there are no more children.

The real point is that no one in the subapostolic era or the centuries following support your personal opinions of Scripture with regard to St. Joseph or Mary, the Virgin Mother of God. Perhaps you wish to claim you have received a revelation like Joseph Smith?

43 posted on 10/27/2002 12:08:56 PM PST by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cleburne
I disagree..hold fast...our belief in Christ...doesn't mean till he comes we no longer believe..
44 posted on 10/27/2002 12:09:12 PM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Hey Siobhan...good to see you :) I have to go as well...can you and others lend me a helping hand? Thanks..God Bless..
45 posted on 10/27/2002 12:11:00 PM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
\??ill be leaving in a minute..and I say this not out of pride but by the grace of God .I can clean your clock with teaching on the typeology of EVERYTHING in Moses's temple...including the ark...your church wants Mary to be equal with God ..so they have moved Him out of the Holy of Holies and moved her in.

That fits well with Catholic theology I guess because when Jesus died the veil that seperated the Holy of Holies from the people..the veil that only the High Priest could go behind once a year to offer sacrifices wae torn in two ..indicating that there was no longer a veil between God and man ..man could approach God directly..

You guys think that the rent veil means you can now go to Mary I guess..the fact she was still alive means little

Irish, Mary can not and does not save you or judge you ...She had to stand in judgement just as we do..

46 posted on 10/27/2002 12:12:20 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
when Jesus died the veil that seperated the Holy of Holies from the people..the veil that only the High Priest could go behind once a year to offer sacrifices wae torn in two

I'm not denying that..Who is Jesus?...Try reading Jermiah too..:)

your church wants Mary to be equal with God ...you say that...we don't believe that..
47 posted on 10/27/2002 12:16:30 PM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
I can't stay either. But you've been faithful and wonderful. God bless.
48 posted on 10/27/2002 12:21:27 PM PST by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
The Catholic Church does not make Mary equal to God. If you think that, perhaps your god is too small.
49 posted on 10/27/2002 12:23:59 PM PST by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: IncredibleHulk
Could you expand on what you consider the meaning of privily to be? I looked it up in Merriam-Webster online and got this:

Main Entry: 1privy
Pronunciation: 'pri-vE
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English prive, from Old French privé, from Latin privatus private
Date: 14th century
1 a : PRIVATE, WITHDRAWN b : SECRET
2 : belonging or relating to a person in one's individual rather than official capacity
3 : admitted as one sharing in a secret (privy to the conspiracy)
- priv·i·ly /-v&-lE/ adverb

50 posted on 10/27/2002 1:00:27 PM PST by perform_to_strangers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Hello again, RNMom.

I really don't want to have my clock cleaned, but I'm puzzled by what you're saying. I can't see anything in calling Mary the new ark that sets her equal to God. God sits on the mercy seat,he isn't the seat itself. As I see it, calling Mary the ark is to say that she is the box which carried the Lord, and upon which the Spirit rested. An object, not a God.
51 posted on 10/27/2002 1:20:42 PM PST by perform_to_strangers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
It is very heartening to see archeology confirming the Orthodox Christian account of Our Lord's family history. In the East, the Proto-Evangelium of James is regarded as trustworthy in terms of the family history of the Theotokos, St. James the Brother-of-the-Lord, St. Joseph the Betrothed and Our Lord, this despite obvious gnostic accretions to the childhood narratives concerning Our Lord Jesus Christ.

The unusual ossuary inscription titling James bar-Joseph as the "brother of Jesus" is fully in keeping with the teachings of Holy Tradition that James was worthy of the title "Brother of the Lord" because he was the only one of St. Joseph's sons by his deceased wife Salome to be willing to share his inheritance with his stepbrother Jesus. In the traditional account, the betrothal of the aged widower Joseph to the Blessed Virgin was a way of supporting her vow of perpetual virginity.

Orthodox icons of the Flight into Egypt show the aged Joseph leading an ass bearing the Theotokos and the Christ child, with a young man, St. James, walking beside them--another way in which he proved brother indeed to Christ.

I hope this find will allow our separated Latin betheren to speak with one voice with us Orthodox in dealing with protestants who deny the title Ever-Virgin confirmed by the Fifth Ecumenical Council. We should have no more of the "cousin" nonsense started by St. Jerome.

52 posted on 10/27/2002 6:35:47 PM PST by The_Reader_David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polemikos; GatorGirl; tiki; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Ping.
53 posted on 10/27/2002 7:46:17 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
So, if this was The James, wouldn't it have said Bishop of Jerusalem on the ossuary-since that was a really big deal?
54 posted on 10/28/2002 2:57:09 AM PST by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
Which is the more notable title? Brother of Jesus or Bishop of Jerusalem?
55 posted on 10/28/2002 3:27:20 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Joshua
"You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever; his kingdom will never end."

"How will this be," Mary asked the angel, "since I am a virgin?"

Does Mary's response sound a bit strange to you considering that she was getting married?
56 posted on 10/28/2002 4:31:24 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joshua
"Further, where in Scripture does it say Joseph demanded that "right?"

Where in scripture does it say he wouldn't?

1 Corinthians 7:5
"Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer."

John Paul II puts St. Paul's remark into context:

"In Egypt there was a community of women who, associated with the Essene spirituality, observed continence. These women, the Therapeutae, belonging to a sect described by Philo of Alexandria (De Vita Contemplativa, 21-90), were dedicated to contemplation and sought wisdom.

It does not seem that Mary ever knew about these Jewish religious groups which practiced the ideal of celibacy and virginity. But the fact that John the Baptist probably lived a celibate life and that in the community of his disciples it was held in high esteem would support the supposition that Mary's choice of virginity belonged to this new cultural and religious context.

...Thus it should be maintained that Mary was guided to the ideal of virginity by an exceptional inspiration of that same Holy Spirit who, in the course of the Church's history, will spur many women to the way of virginal consecration.

The singular presence of grace in Mary's life leads to the conclusion that the young girl was committed to virginity. Filled with the Lord's exceptional gifts from the beginning of her life, she was oriented to a total gift of self--body and soul--to God, in the offering of herself as a virgin.

In addition, her aspiration to the virginal life was in harmony with that "poverty" before God which the Old Testament holds in high esteem. Fully committing herself to this path, Mary also gives up motherhood, woman's personal treasure, so deeply appreciated in Israel. Thus she "stands out among the poor and humble of the Lord, who confidently hope for and receive salvation from him" (Lumen gentium, n. 55). However, presenting herself to God as poor and aiming only at spiritual fruitfulness, the fruit of divine love, at the moment of the Annunciation, Mary discovers that the Lord has transformed her poverty into riches: she will be the Virgin Mother of the Son of the Most High. Later she will also discover that her motherhood is destined to extend to all men, whom the Son came to save (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 501)."

Our Lady Intended to Remain a Virgin
Pope John Paul II
General Audience, July 24, 1996


57 posted on 10/28/2002 4:57:55 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
The point is that the renting of the veil was a VERY significant symbol by God

Untill we were Justified by the death of Christ we (men) could not go into the presence of God..NOW men could go to God directly..the shekhina glory of God met with Israel from the Mercy seat..that is How they knew he was with them..The entire temple was typeology ...the candlesticks ,the lavor, the altars the horns on it..EVERYTHING pointed to our salvation by Christ.

By making the ark Mary it makes her god..Did Mary fulfill the Law? Was she a priest (the sign that the flowering rod demonstrated) Is she the Bread of Life?

I have read Jermiah:>) And it moved me not to pray to Mary or ascribe the charactor or the power of God to her:>))

58 posted on 10/28/2002 7:29:00 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
The Catholic Church does not make Mary equal to God. If you think that, perhaps your god is too small.

I do not believe MOST Catholics do (some freepers seem to though)

The veil is rent..you can go directly to God with your petitions..you may approach the throne of God boldly..There is one mediator between God and man and that mediator is Christ Jesus

I love Mary..I think she was given to us as a role model...but she is not my savior, my mediator or my God

I used to belong to a Catholic organization where I would meet with with other Catholics and we would discuss how God was working in our lives..Not long before I realized I could no longer stay I went to the meeting and sat in a group where the name of Christ was never said..all they discussed was Mary and the rosary .I never returned to the meetings.

I do not believe that Mary desires the glory due her son..

59 posted on 10/28/2002 7:52:16 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: perform_to_strangers
LOL Hi ...

I can't see anything in calling Mary the new ark that sets her equal to God. God sits on the mercy seat,he isn't the seat itself. As I see it, calling Mary the ark is to say that she is the box which carried the Lord, and upon which the Spirit rested. An object, not a God.

hey you can call anything, anything you want..but that does not mean that God likes it or accepts it

Moses tabernacle in the wilderness was Gods plan not mans..He got to choose what was in there, how it was made and what it meant..

So you can say Mary was the ark if you want to..but God hates you changing His words and His plans and His message

Are you saying that the ritual (that pre figures Christ) was actually TO Mary?

Leviticus 16
The Day of Atonement

1 The LORD spoke to Moses after the death of the two sons of Aaron who died when they approached the LORD .
2 The LORD said to Moses: "Tell your brother Aaron not to come whenever he chooses into the Most Holy Place behind the curtain in front of the atonement cover on the ark, or else he will die, because I appear in the cloud over the atonement cover.
3 "This is how Aaron is to enter the sanctuary area: with a young bull for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering.
4 He is to put on the sacred linen tunic, with linen undergarments next to his body; he is to tie the linen sash around him and put on the linen turban. These are sacred garments; so he must bathe himself with water before he puts them on.
5 From the Israelite community he is to take two male goats for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering.
6 "Aaron is to offer the bull for his own sin offering to make atonement for himself and his household.
7 Then he is to take the two goats and present them before the LORD at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting.
8 He is to cast lots for the two goats-one lot for the LORD and the other for the scapegoat. [1]
9 Aaron shall bring the goat whose lot falls to the LORD and sacrifice it for a sin offering.
10 But the goat chosen by lot as the scapegoat shall be presented alive before the LORD to be used for making atonement by sending it into the desert as a scapegoat.
11 "Aaron shall bring the bull for his own sin offering to make atonement for himself and his household, and he is to slaughter the bull for his own sin offering.
12 He is to take a censer full of burning coals from the altar before the LORD and two handfuls of finely ground fragrant incense and take them behind the curtain.
13 He is to put the incense on the fire before the LORD , and the smoke of the incense will conceal the atonement cover above the Testimony, so that he will not die.
14 He is to take some of the bull's blood and with his finger sprinkle it on the front of the atonement cover; then he shall sprinkle some of it with his finger seven times before the atonement cover.
15 "He shall then slaughter the goat for the sin offering for the people and take its blood behind the curtain and do with it as he did with the bull's blood: He shall sprinkle it on the atonement cover and in front of it.
16 In this way he will make atonement for the Most Holy Place because of the uncleanness and rebellion of the Israelites, whatever their sins have been. He is to do the same for the Tent of Meeting, which is among them in the midst of their uncleanness.
17 No one is to be in the Tent of Meeting from the time Aaron goes in to make atonement in the Most Holy Place until he comes out, having made atonement for himself, his household and the whole community of Israel.
18 "Then he shall come out to the altar that is before the LORD and make atonement for it. He shall take some of the bull's blood and some of the goat's blood and put it on all the horns of the altar.
19 He shall sprinkle some of the blood on it with his finger seven times to cleanse it and to consecrate it from the uncleanness of the Israelites.
20 "When Aaron has finished making atonement for the Most Holy Place, the Tent of Meeting and the altar, he shall bring forward the live goat.
21 He is to lay both hands on the head of the live goat and confess over it all the wickedness and rebellion of the Israelites-all their sins-and put them on the goat's head. He shall send the goat away into the desert in the care of a man appointed for the task.
22 The goat will carry on itself all their sins to a solitary place; and the man shall release it in the desert.
23 "Then Aaron is to go into the Tent of Meeting and take off the linen garments he put on before he entered the Most Holy Place, and he is to leave them there.
24 He shall bathe himself with water in a holy place and put on his regular garments. Then he shall come out and sacrifice the burnt offering for himself and the burnt offering for the people, to make atonement for himself and for the people.
25 He shall also burn the fat of the sin offering on the altar.
26 "The man who releases the goat as a scapegoat must wash his clothes and bathe himself with water; afterward he may come into the camp.
27 The bull and the goat for the sin offerings, whose blood was brought into the Most Holy Place to make atonement, must be taken outside the camp; their hides, flesh and offal are to be burned up.
28 The man who burns them must wash his clothes and bathe himself with water; afterward he may come into the camp.
29 "This is to be a lasting ordinance for you: On the tenth day of the seventh month you must deny yourselves [2] and not do any work-whether native-born or an alien living among you-
30 because on this day atonement will be made for you, to cleanse you. Then, before the LORD , you will be clean from all your sins.
31 It is a sabbath of rest, and you must deny yourselves; it is a lasting ordinance.
32 The priest who is anointed and ordained to succeed his father as high priest is to make atonement. He is to put on the sacred linen garments
33 and make atonement for the Most Holy Place, for the Tent of Meeting and the altar, and for the priests and all the people of the community.
34 "This is to be a lasting ordinance for you: Atonement is to be made once a year for all the sins of the Israelites."
And it was done, as the LORD commanded Moses.

The ark had the Law , a reminder of the Judgement and the grace and mercy of the Father

It had the manna .(The bread of life)

Moses said, "This is what the Lord has commanded: 'Take an omer of manna and keep it for the generations to come, so they can see the bread I gave you to eat in the desert when I brought you out of Egypt.'"
So Moses said to Aaron, "Take a jar and put an omer of manna in it. Then place it before the Lord to be kept for the generations to come."

A reminder of the provision and grace of God As the Lord commanded Moses, Aaron put the manna in front of the Testimony, that it might be kept.

God ordered the sign of the priesthood of Arron and the type of the priesthood of Chrsit in the ark

Numbers 17 10 The LORD said to Moses, "Put back Aaron's staff in front of the Testimony, to be kept as a sign to the rebellious. This will put an end to their grumbling against me, so that they will not die."

The Tabernacle of Moses..


60 posted on 10/28/2002 8:15:05 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson